The Most Efficient Seaweed Species as a Bioremediator of Intensive Pond Waste

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Muhammad Syahrir
{"title":"The Most Efficient Seaweed Species as a Bioremediator of Intensive Pond Waste","authors":"Muhammad Syahrir","doi":"10.12911/22998993/174179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seaweed species have a positive effect on the bioremediation of nutrient waste. However, waste absorption ef - ficiency varies between species. This research aims to analyze the most efficient seaweed as bioremediation of intensive waste ponds. The method used in this research was three types of seaweed stocked based on treatment groups in each of three tanks measuring 100×100×100 cm made of bamboo, wood, and specially designed tar-paulin. This study was carried out on a laboratory scale for 42 days on three local seaweed species to evaluate the waste disposal efficiency of each seaweed species. This research was conducted at the Bone Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic Laboratory, Tulang Daerah, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia, from September to October 2022. Measurement of ammonia (NH 3 -N), nitrite (NO 2 -N), nitrate (NO 3 -N), and phosphate (PO 4 -P) carried out at the Center for Brackish Water Aquaculture and Fisheries Extension in Maros, the concentrations of the four nutrient wastes were significantly different (P<0.05), indicating differences in nutrient removal for each seaweed species. The removal efficiency of NH 3 -N, NO 2 -N, NO 3 -N, and PO -P by G. verrucosa (97.1, 99.7, 99.9, 99.7%) was significantly higher (P<0.05) compared with E. spinosum (90.5, 93.9, 96.4, 95.4%) and K. alvarezii (81.6%, 94.6%, 94.5%, and 95.4%, respectively). Meanwhile, E. spinosum was not significantly different (P>0.05) from K. alvare-zii in removing NO 2 -N, NO 3 -N, and PO 4 -P but was more efficient in reducing NH 3 -N. Overall, G. verrucosa is the most efficient in intensive disposal of shrimp pond waste based on the results of this study.","PeriodicalId":15652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecological Engineering","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/174179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seaweed species have a positive effect on the bioremediation of nutrient waste. However, waste absorption ef - ficiency varies between species. This research aims to analyze the most efficient seaweed as bioremediation of intensive waste ponds. The method used in this research was three types of seaweed stocked based on treatment groups in each of three tanks measuring 100×100×100 cm made of bamboo, wood, and specially designed tar-paulin. This study was carried out on a laboratory scale for 42 days on three local seaweed species to evaluate the waste disposal efficiency of each seaweed species. This research was conducted at the Bone Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic Laboratory, Tulang Daerah, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia, from September to October 2022. Measurement of ammonia (NH 3 -N), nitrite (NO 2 -N), nitrate (NO 3 -N), and phosphate (PO 4 -P) carried out at the Center for Brackish Water Aquaculture and Fisheries Extension in Maros, the concentrations of the four nutrient wastes were significantly different (P<0.05), indicating differences in nutrient removal for each seaweed species. The removal efficiency of NH 3 -N, NO 2 -N, NO 3 -N, and PO -P by G. verrucosa (97.1, 99.7, 99.9, 99.7%) was significantly higher (P<0.05) compared with E. spinosum (90.5, 93.9, 96.4, 95.4%) and K. alvarezii (81.6%, 94.6%, 94.5%, and 95.4%, respectively). Meanwhile, E. spinosum was not significantly different (P>0.05) from K. alvare-zii in removing NO 2 -N, NO 3 -N, and PO 4 -P but was more efficient in reducing NH 3 -N. Overall, G. verrucosa is the most efficient in intensive disposal of shrimp pond waste based on the results of this study.
最有效的集约化池塘废弃物生物修复海藻品种
海藻物种对营养废物的生物修复有积极作用。然而,不同种类的海藻对废物的吸收能力各不相同。本研究旨在分析最有效的海藻对密集型废物池塘的生物修复作用。本研究采用的方法是在三个面积分别为 100×100×100 厘米的池塘中按处理组投放三种类型的海藻,池塘分别由竹子、木头和专门设计的防水油布制成。这项研究在实验室对三种本地海藻进行了为期 42 天的试验,以评估每种海藻的废物处理效率。这项研究于 2022 年 9 月至 10 月在印度尼西亚南苏拉威西省 Tulang Daerah 的 Bone 海洋与渔业理工实验室进行。在马罗斯咸水养殖和渔业推广中心进行的氨氮(NH 3 -N)、亚硝酸盐(NO 2 -N)、硝酸盐(NO 3 -N)和磷酸盐(PO 4 -P)测量结果显示,在去除 NO 2 -N、NO 3 -N 和 PO 4 -P 方面,四种营养废物的浓度与 K. alvare-zii 有显著差异(P0.05),但在减少 NH 3 -N 方面效率更高。总体而言,根据本研究的结果,疣尾藻类在集中处理虾池废物方面效率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ecological Engineering
Journal of Ecological Engineering ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
379
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: - Industrial and municipal waste management - Pro-ecological technologies and products - Energy-saving technologies - Environmental landscaping - Environmental monitoring - Climate change in the environment - Sustainable development - Processing and usage of mineral resources - Recovery of valuable materials and fuels - Surface water and groundwater management - Water and wastewater treatment - Smog and air pollution prevention - Protection and reclamation of soils - Reclamation and revitalization of degraded areas - Heavy metals in the environment - Renewable energy technologies - Environmental protection of rural areas - Restoration and protection of urban environment - Prevention of noise in the environment - Environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) - Simulations and computer modeling for the environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信