Evaluating the Implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL): A Study at the English Language Education Study Program, Faculty of Education, Jambi University

Adrefiza Adrefiza, Ahmad Ridha, Habizar Habizar
{"title":"Evaluating the Implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL): A Study at the English Language Education Study Program, Faculty of Education, Jambi University","authors":"Adrefiza Adrefiza, Ahmad Ridha, Habizar Habizar","doi":"10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i1.49787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study evaluated the implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) by the lecturers at the English Language Education Study Program, Faculty of Education, Jambi University. Using information from 100 selected students through electronic email questionnaires with Likert’s 5 points-scale of frequency levels (never to always) concerning ten PjBL main principles, the results fell into the “good” category with an average score of (3.17). Principle 1 (Starting the class with driving questions/issues/problems); 2 (Students work independently in small groups based on a selected project); and 7 (The groups do project presentations for feedback) received the highest rate in the evaluation with an average score of (3.8) each, followed by the principle 4 (The groups discuss, pose, inquire, analyze, and evaluate issues or problems related to the topics) and the principle 9 (The students develop new soft-skills e.g. collaboration, problem-solving, critical thinking, and management skills) with the average scores of (3.5 & 3.2) respectively. The other principles such as “collecting information, facts, evidence, and data outside the classroom for the project work” (principle 5) and “receiving feedback and controls from the lecturers” (principle 6), still need to be improved and developed to achieve better results in the future.","PeriodicalId":413908,"journal":{"name":"Innovare Journal of Education","volume":"62 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovare Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2024v12i1.49787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study evaluated the implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) by the lecturers at the English Language Education Study Program, Faculty of Education, Jambi University. Using information from 100 selected students through electronic email questionnaires with Likert’s 5 points-scale of frequency levels (never to always) concerning ten PjBL main principles, the results fell into the “good” category with an average score of (3.17). Principle 1 (Starting the class with driving questions/issues/problems); 2 (Students work independently in small groups based on a selected project); and 7 (The groups do project presentations for feedback) received the highest rate in the evaluation with an average score of (3.8) each, followed by the principle 4 (The groups discuss, pose, inquire, analyze, and evaluate issues or problems related to the topics) and the principle 9 (The students develop new soft-skills e.g. collaboration, problem-solving, critical thinking, and management skills) with the average scores of (3.5 & 3.2) respectively. The other principles such as “collecting information, facts, evidence, and data outside the classroom for the project work” (principle 5) and “receiving feedback and controls from the lecturers” (principle 6), still need to be improved and developed to achieve better results in the future.
评估项目式学习(PjBL)的实施情况:对占碑大学教育学院英语教育研究项目的研究
本研究评估了占碑大学教育学院英语教育研究课程讲师实施项目式学习(PjBL)的情况。本研究通过电子邮件向 100 名被选中的学生发放了调查问卷,采用李克特五点频度量表(从从不到总是)对 PjBL 的十项主要原则进行了调查,结果属于 "良好 "类别,平均得分为(3.17)。原则 1(课堂开始时提出驱动性问题/议题/难题)、原则 2(学生根据选定的项目以小组为单位独立工作)和原则 7(小组进行项目展示以获得反馈)在评估中得分最高,平均分均为(3.8),其次是原则 3(学生根据选定的项目以小组为单位独立工作)和原则 7(小组进行项目展示以获得反馈)。8分),其次是原则4(小组讨论、提出、探究、分析和评估与主题相关的问题)和原则9(学生发展新的软技能,如协作、解决问题、批判性思维和管理技能),平均分分别为(3.5分和3.2分)。其他原则,如 "为项目工作收集课外信息、事实、证据和数据"(原则 5)和 "接受讲 师的反馈和控制"(原则 6),仍有待改进和发展,以便在今后取得更好的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信