MIXING SEQUENCE EFFECT OF CEMENT COMPOSITES WITH CARBON FIBRES

IF 0.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. N. Rizalman, Eliezer Nevall Anthony, Anand Ryan Thurairajah, Sheikh Mohd Iqbal S.Z.A., M. Sulaiman
{"title":"MIXING SEQUENCE EFFECT OF CEMENT COMPOSITES WITH CARBON FIBRES","authors":"A. N. Rizalman, Eliezer Nevall Anthony, Anand Ryan Thurairajah, Sheikh Mohd Iqbal S.Z.A., M. Sulaiman","doi":"10.31436/iiumej.v25i1.2983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon fibres are widely recognised as reinforcement materials that effectively control cracks in concrete structures. Nonetheless, these fibres do not disperse uniformly inside the cement matrix, disrupting the mixture homogeneity. To address this concern, this study investigated two distinct mixing sequences of cement composites with carbon fibres. Two mixing sequences were investigated including the addition of fibres after cement (AC-CF) and the addition of fibres before cement (BC-CF). The surface topography of carbon fibres and the engineering properties of the cement paste were also examined. Consequently, carbon fibres in cement composite produced lower flowability due to the surface roughness. The AC-CF specimen demonstrated the highest hardened density at 28 days with 2679.22 kg/m3 followed by BC-CF and the control specimen with 2386.08 kg/m3 and 2278.36 kg/3, respectively. The AC-CF specimen also had the highest compressive strength at 28 days with 69.91 MPa, followed by BC-CF and the control specimen with 65.92 MPa and 63.20 MPa, respectively. Further, the flexural strength of the AC-CF specimen exhibited the highest strength with 10.86 MPa, followed by BC-CF and the control specimen with 9.35 MPa and 9.17, respectively. The fibre dispersion in AC-CF was also superior to BC-CF. Therefore, it can be concluded that the best mixing sequence is the addition of fibre after cement (AC-CF) because it had better fibre dispersion and engineering properties compared to the addition of fibre before cement (BC-CF). ABSTRAK: Gentian karbon lebih dikenali sebagai bahan bantuan yang berkesan dalam mengawal keretakan pada struktur konkrit. Walau bagaimanapun, gentian ini tidak tersebar secara seragam di dalam matrik simen dan akan mengganggu kehomogenan campuran. Bagi mengatasi masalah ini, kajian ini mengkaji tentang dua susunan campuran berbeza simen komposit dengan gentian karbon. Dua susunan campuran ini adalah melalui penambahan gentian selepas simen (AC-CF) dan penambahan gentian sebelum simen (BC-CF). Permukaan topografi gentian karbon dan sifat kejuruteraan pes simen turut diperiksa. Kajian mendapati bahawa gentian karbon dalam komposit simen mengurangkan kebolehaliran pes simen disebabkan oleh kekasaran pada permukaan gentian. Spesimen AC-CF menunjukkan ketumpatan pengerasan tertinggi pada hari ke-28 dengan 2679.22 kg/m3 diikuti spesimen BC-CF dan spesimen kawalan sebanyak 2386.08 kg/m3 dan 2278.36 kg/m3, masing-masing. Spesimen AC-CF juga mempunyai kekuatan mampatan tertinggi pada hari ke-28 dengan 69.91 MPa, diikuti oleh spesimen BC-CF dan spesimen kawalan sebanyak 65.92 MPa dan 63.20 MPa, masing-masing. Seterusnya, kekuatan lenturan spesimen AC-CF menunjukkan kekuatan tertinggi dengan 10.86 MPa, diikuti spesimen BC-CF and spesimen kawalan dengan 9.35 MPa dan 9.17 MPa, masing-masing. Penyebaran gentian dalam AC-CF juga lebih baik daripada BC-CF. Oleh itu, kajian ini merumuskan bahawa susunan campuran terbaik adalah dengan penambahan gentian selepas simen (AC-CF) kerana ia mempunyai kekuatan lenturan gentian terbaik dan sifat kejuruteraan berbanding penambahan gentian sebelum simen (BC-CF).","PeriodicalId":13439,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Engineering Journal","volume":"17 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v25i1.2983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon fibres are widely recognised as reinforcement materials that effectively control cracks in concrete structures. Nonetheless, these fibres do not disperse uniformly inside the cement matrix, disrupting the mixture homogeneity. To address this concern, this study investigated two distinct mixing sequences of cement composites with carbon fibres. Two mixing sequences were investigated including the addition of fibres after cement (AC-CF) and the addition of fibres before cement (BC-CF). The surface topography of carbon fibres and the engineering properties of the cement paste were also examined. Consequently, carbon fibres in cement composite produced lower flowability due to the surface roughness. The AC-CF specimen demonstrated the highest hardened density at 28 days with 2679.22 kg/m3 followed by BC-CF and the control specimen with 2386.08 kg/m3 and 2278.36 kg/3, respectively. The AC-CF specimen also had the highest compressive strength at 28 days with 69.91 MPa, followed by BC-CF and the control specimen with 65.92 MPa and 63.20 MPa, respectively. Further, the flexural strength of the AC-CF specimen exhibited the highest strength with 10.86 MPa, followed by BC-CF and the control specimen with 9.35 MPa and 9.17, respectively. The fibre dispersion in AC-CF was also superior to BC-CF. Therefore, it can be concluded that the best mixing sequence is the addition of fibre after cement (AC-CF) because it had better fibre dispersion and engineering properties compared to the addition of fibre before cement (BC-CF). ABSTRAK: Gentian karbon lebih dikenali sebagai bahan bantuan yang berkesan dalam mengawal keretakan pada struktur konkrit. Walau bagaimanapun, gentian ini tidak tersebar secara seragam di dalam matrik simen dan akan mengganggu kehomogenan campuran. Bagi mengatasi masalah ini, kajian ini mengkaji tentang dua susunan campuran berbeza simen komposit dengan gentian karbon. Dua susunan campuran ini adalah melalui penambahan gentian selepas simen (AC-CF) dan penambahan gentian sebelum simen (BC-CF). Permukaan topografi gentian karbon dan sifat kejuruteraan pes simen turut diperiksa. Kajian mendapati bahawa gentian karbon dalam komposit simen mengurangkan kebolehaliran pes simen disebabkan oleh kekasaran pada permukaan gentian. Spesimen AC-CF menunjukkan ketumpatan pengerasan tertinggi pada hari ke-28 dengan 2679.22 kg/m3 diikuti spesimen BC-CF dan spesimen kawalan sebanyak 2386.08 kg/m3 dan 2278.36 kg/m3, masing-masing. Spesimen AC-CF juga mempunyai kekuatan mampatan tertinggi pada hari ke-28 dengan 69.91 MPa, diikuti oleh spesimen BC-CF dan spesimen kawalan sebanyak 65.92 MPa dan 63.20 MPa, masing-masing. Seterusnya, kekuatan lenturan spesimen AC-CF menunjukkan kekuatan tertinggi dengan 10.86 MPa, diikuti spesimen BC-CF and spesimen kawalan dengan 9.35 MPa dan 9.17 MPa, masing-masing. Penyebaran gentian dalam AC-CF juga lebih baik daripada BC-CF. Oleh itu, kajian ini merumuskan bahawa susunan campuran terbaik adalah dengan penambahan gentian selepas simen (AC-CF) kerana ia mempunyai kekuatan lenturan gentian terbaik dan sifat kejuruteraan berbanding penambahan gentian sebelum simen (BC-CF).
碳纤维水泥复合材料的混合顺序效应
碳纤维是公认的加固材料,能有效控制混凝土结构中的裂缝。然而,这些纤维并不能均匀地分散在水泥基质中,从而破坏了混合物的均匀性。为了解决这一问题,本研究对含有碳纤维的水泥复合材料的两种不同混合顺序进行了调查。研究了两种混合顺序,包括在水泥后添加纤维(AC-CF)和在水泥前添加纤维(BC-CF)。此外,还考察了碳纤维的表面形貌和水泥浆的工程特性。结果表明,水泥复合材料中的碳纤维由于表面粗糙而产生较低的流动性。28 天时,AC-CF 试样的硬化密度最高,达到 2679.22 kg/m3,其次是 BC-CF 和对照试样,分别为 2386.08 kg/m3 和 2278.36 kg/3。AC-CF 试样在 28 天时的抗压强度也最高,为 69.91 兆帕,其次是 BC-CF 和对照试样,分别为 65.92 兆帕和 63.20 兆帕。此外,AC-CF 试样的抗弯强度最高,为 10.86 兆帕,其次是 BC-CF 和对照试样,分别为 9.35 兆帕和 9.17 兆帕。AC-CF 中的纤维分散性也优于 BC-CF。因此,可以得出结论,最佳的混合顺序是在水泥后添加纤维(AC-CF),因为与在水泥前添加纤维(BC-CF)相比,它具有更好的纤维分散性和工程特性。摘要碳龙胆被认为是控制混凝土结构裂缝的有效辅助材料。然而,这些纤维在水泥基质中分散不均匀,会破坏混合物的均匀性。为了克服这一问题,本研究对碳纤维复合水泥的两种不同混合安排进行了研究。这两种混合安排分别是在水泥后添加龙胆(AC-CF)和在水泥前添加龙胆(BC-CF)。研究还考察了碳纤维的表面形貌和水泥的工程特性。研究发现,由于碳纤维表面粗糙,水泥复合材料中的碳纤维降低了水泥浆的渗透性。第 28 天时,AC-CF 试样的硬化密度最高,达到 2679.22 kg/m3,其次是 BC-CF 试样和对照试样,分别为 2386.08 kg/m3 和 2278.36 kg/m3。AC-CF 试样在第 28 天的抗压强度也最高,为 69.91 兆帕,其次是 BC-CF 试样和对照试样,分别为 65.92 兆帕和 63.20 兆帕。此外,AC-CF 试样的抗折强度最高,为 10.86 兆帕,其次是 BC-CF 试样和对照试样,分别为 9.35 兆帕和 9.17 兆帕。龙胆在 AC-CF 中的分散性也优于 BC-CF。因此,本研究认为,最佳的混合安排是在水泥后添加水泥(AC-CF),因为与水泥前添加水泥(BC-CF)相比,它具有最佳的水泥抗折强度和工程特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IIUM Engineering Journal
IIUM Engineering Journal ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The IIUM Engineering Journal, published biannually (June and December), is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of the Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). The IIUM Engineering Journal publishes original research findings as regular papers, review papers (by invitation). The Journal provides a platform for Engineers, Researchers, Academicians, and Practitioners who are highly motivated in contributing to the Engineering disciplines, and Applied Sciences. It also welcomes contributions that address solutions to the specific challenges of the developing world, and address science and technology issues from an Islamic and multidisciplinary perspective. Subject areas suitable for publication are as follows: -Chemical and Biotechnology Engineering -Civil and Environmental Engineering -Computer Science and Information Technology -Electrical, Computer, and Communications Engineering -Engineering Mathematics and Applied Science -Materials and Manufacturing Engineering -Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering -Mechatronics and Automation Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信