Improving the use of Nabers probes for furcation detection during periodontal assessment in dental curricula

Emily Ming-Chieh Lu, Svetislav Zaric
{"title":"Improving the use of Nabers probes for furcation detection during periodontal assessment in dental curricula","authors":"Emily Ming-Chieh Lu, Svetislav Zaric","doi":"10.1308/rcsfdj.2024.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection of furcation involvement (FI) is an integral part of full periodontal examination. The aims of this study were to: 1) investigate the extent to which furcation assessment was performed and recorded by undergraduate and postgraduate students on clinic; 2) evaluate the perceptions of teachers about possible problems in relation to furcation assessment among students; and 3) assess the impact of the dental school’s educational interventions on the improvement in furcation assessment among students. Students were interviewed after their periodontal assessment. This occurred in three different settings: undergraduate and postgraduate treatment clinics, and new patient assessment clinics. Teachers were also interviewed about their perceptions of the students’ quality of furcation assessment. Students were re-surveyed following educational interventions to improve their furcation detection. The baseline questionnaire showed that only 44% of the undergraduate students checked for FI; this compared with 83% of postgraduate students. Of those undergraduate students who assessed FI, only 13% used a Nabers probe and 63% did not record their finding in the patient’s notes. Following educational interventions, 56% of the undergraduates performed furcation assessment, with 78% of these using a Nabers probe. Furcation assessment is often missed during the full periodontal examination carried out by undergraduate dental students and Nabers probes are rarely used. However, teaching interventions have the potential to improve the students’ learning experience and therefore also patient care.","PeriodicalId":342721,"journal":{"name":"Faculty Dental Journal","volume":"53 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faculty Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsfdj.2024.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detection of furcation involvement (FI) is an integral part of full periodontal examination. The aims of this study were to: 1) investigate the extent to which furcation assessment was performed and recorded by undergraduate and postgraduate students on clinic; 2) evaluate the perceptions of teachers about possible problems in relation to furcation assessment among students; and 3) assess the impact of the dental school’s educational interventions on the improvement in furcation assessment among students. Students were interviewed after their periodontal assessment. This occurred in three different settings: undergraduate and postgraduate treatment clinics, and new patient assessment clinics. Teachers were also interviewed about their perceptions of the students’ quality of furcation assessment. Students were re-surveyed following educational interventions to improve their furcation detection. The baseline questionnaire showed that only 44% of the undergraduate students checked for FI; this compared with 83% of postgraduate students. Of those undergraduate students who assessed FI, only 13% used a Nabers probe and 63% did not record their finding in the patient’s notes. Following educational interventions, 56% of the undergraduates performed furcation assessment, with 78% of these using a Nabers probe. Furcation assessment is often missed during the full periodontal examination carried out by undergraduate dental students and Nabers probes are rarely used. However, teaching interventions have the potential to improve the students’ learning experience and therefore also patient care.
在牙科课程的牙周评估中改进纳贝斯探针在毛囊检测中的应用
毛囊受累(FI)的检测是全面牙周检查不可或缺的一部分。本研究的目的是1)调查本科生和研究生在门诊中进行和记录窝沟封闭评估的程度;2)评估教师对学生窝沟封闭评估中可能存在的问题的看法;3)评估牙科学院的教育干预对改善学生窝沟封闭评估的影响。学生们在牙周评估后接受了访谈。访谈在三种不同的环境中进行:本科生和研究生治疗诊所,以及新患者评估诊所。教师也接受了访谈,了解他们对学生毛囊评估质量的看法。在采取教育干预措施以提高学生的窝沟检测能力后,对学生进行了再次调查。基线调查问卷显示,只有44%的本科生检查了毛囊角化,而研究生的这一比例为83%。在对窝沟封闭进行评估的本科生中,只有 13% 的学生使用了 Nabers 探针,63% 的学生没有在病历中记录他们的发现。经过教育干预后,56% 的本科生进行了窝沟封闭评估,其中 78% 使用了纳博探针。在牙科本科生进行的全面牙周检查中,经常会忽略对窝沟的评估,而且很少使用纳博探针。然而,教学干预措施有可能改善学生的学习体验,从而改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信