What Competences Are Promoting in University Teacher Training Programs? A Study of Spanish Public Universities

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
B. Arcas, T. Sánchez
{"title":"What Competences Are Promoting in University Teacher Training Programs? A Study of Spanish Public Universities","authors":"B. Arcas, T. Sánchez","doi":"10.29333/iji.2024.17133a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to assess the extent to which university teacher training in Spain matches with the literature framework about teaching competencies in higher education. The absence of a generic definition of what it means to be a competent teacher and the need for a competency profile on which to base the study, leads to undertake an initial bibliometric review of the main educational research databases ERIC, PsycINFO and Psychology Database. The studies were selected to extract a categorical classification that allowed to code the content analysis of the training programs offered in 41 Spanish public universities in seven competencies: content-related competency (research), personal, pedagogical, social, communicative, digital and technological and ecological. 2425 training courses were coded and analyzed with Maxqda version 20.4.2 and Excel database. The findings show that university teachers receive more training in competencies related to technology, pedagogy, and disciplinary content-research, and less training in personal and ecological competencies. The conclusion of the study highlights the lack of consensus between literature review and programs on what constitutes good teaching among teachers and students and the fact that continuing professional development remains dependent on teacher initiative. Keywords: university teacher competence, university teacher training, descriptive analysis, Spanish context, teacher training","PeriodicalId":46858,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Instruction","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17133a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study is to assess the extent to which university teacher training in Spain matches with the literature framework about teaching competencies in higher education. The absence of a generic definition of what it means to be a competent teacher and the need for a competency profile on which to base the study, leads to undertake an initial bibliometric review of the main educational research databases ERIC, PsycINFO and Psychology Database. The studies were selected to extract a categorical classification that allowed to code the content analysis of the training programs offered in 41 Spanish public universities in seven competencies: content-related competency (research), personal, pedagogical, social, communicative, digital and technological and ecological. 2425 training courses were coded and analyzed with Maxqda version 20.4.2 and Excel database. The findings show that university teachers receive more training in competencies related to technology, pedagogy, and disciplinary content-research, and less training in personal and ecological competencies. The conclusion of the study highlights the lack of consensus between literature review and programs on what constitutes good teaching among teachers and students and the fact that continuing professional development remains dependent on teacher initiative. Keywords: university teacher competence, university teacher training, descriptive analysis, Spanish context, teacher training
大学师资培训项目在提升哪些能力?对西班牙公立大学的研究
本研究旨在评估西班牙大学教师培训与高等教育教学能力文献框架的匹配程度。由于对合格教师的含义缺乏通用定义,而且需要一个能力概况作为研究基础,因此对主要的教育研究数据库ERIC、PsycINFO和心理学数据库进行了初步的文献计量学审查。通过对这些研究的筛选,提取出一种分类方法,从而可以对 41 所西班牙公立大学提供的培训课程内容分析进行编码,分为七种能力:与内容相关的能力(研究)、个人能力、教学能力、社会能力、沟通能力、数字能力以及技术和生态能力。利用 Maxqda 20.4.2 版和 Excel 数据库对 2425 门培训课程进行了编码和分析。研究结果表明,大学教师在技术、教学法和学科内容研究方面接受的能力培训较多,而在个人能力和生态能力方面接受的培训较少。研究结论强调了文献综述和项目之间对教师和学生中什么是好的教学缺乏共识,以及持续的专业发展仍然依赖于教师的主动性这一事实。关键词:大学教师能力;大学教师培训;描述性分析;西班牙背景;教师培训
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Instruction
International Journal of Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
38.90%
发文量
244
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: nternational Journal of Instruction is an internationally recognized journal in the field of education and is published four times a year (in January, April, July & October). The aim of this journal is to publish high quality studies in the areas of instruction, learning, teaching, curriculum development, learning environments, teacher education, educational technology, educational developments. Studies may relate to any age level - from infants to adults. IJI, being an international journal, our editorial advisory board members are from various countries around the world. The articles sent to the Journal are always reviewed by two members of the Editorial Advisory Board (double blind peer review), and in some cases, if necessary, by another member of the Board. Depending on the evaluation reports of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board, articles are published or not. Article evaluation process takes approximately three months. The authors are responsible for the errors, if any, in their published articles. The articles need to be not published elsewhere previously.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信