Issues with pedagogical implications in applied linguistics research: A mixed-methods systematic evaluation

Matthew D. Coss , Hyun-Bin Hwang
{"title":"Issues with pedagogical implications in applied linguistics research: A mixed-methods systematic evaluation","authors":"Matthew D. Coss ,&nbsp;Hyun-Bin Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Applied linguists often aim to conduct research with implications for practitioners (widely construed), but only recently has a research agenda emerged which empirically investigates whether this aim is being regularly met (see <span>Sato, 2023</span>). While multiple survey studies (e.g., <span>Marsden &amp; Kasprowicz, 2017</span>; <span>Sato et al., 2021</span>) have made important contributions to this literature, no study has systematically examined <em>how</em> researchers offer implications to intended practitioner audiences. To explore this topic, we conducted a systematic analysis of 118 empirical studies published in <em>TESOL Quarterly</em>. We developed highly reliable scales (avg. IRR = 0.88) to assess the quantity, salience, and quality of pedagogical implications (PIs). Qualitative genre analysis further allowed us to synthesize the features of highly informative PIs. Based on these findings, we offer concrete recommendations for maximizing PI quality for researchers, editors, and reviewers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100094"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277276612300054X/pdfft?md5=cd8b1dd29bb7786ece22e48fc1135a73&pid=1-s2.0-S277276612300054X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277276612300054X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Applied linguists often aim to conduct research with implications for practitioners (widely construed), but only recently has a research agenda emerged which empirically investigates whether this aim is being regularly met (see Sato, 2023). While multiple survey studies (e.g., Marsden & Kasprowicz, 2017; Sato et al., 2021) have made important contributions to this literature, no study has systematically examined how researchers offer implications to intended practitioner audiences. To explore this topic, we conducted a systematic analysis of 118 empirical studies published in TESOL Quarterly. We developed highly reliable scales (avg. IRR = 0.88) to assess the quantity, salience, and quality of pedagogical implications (PIs). Qualitative genre analysis further allowed us to synthesize the features of highly informative PIs. Based on these findings, we offer concrete recommendations for maximizing PI quality for researchers, editors, and reviewers.

应用语言学研究中具有教学意义的问题:混合方法系统评估
应用语言学家通常致力于开展对实践者有影响的研究(广泛理解),但直到最近才出现了一个研究议程,对这一目标是否定期得到实现进行实证调查(见 Sato, 2023)。虽然多项调查研究(如 Marsden & Kasprowicz, 2017; Sato et al.为了探讨这一主题,我们对发表在《TESOL 季刊》上的 118 篇实证研究进行了系统分析。我们开发了高度可靠的量表(平均 IRR = 0.88)来评估教学启示 (PI) 的数量、显著性和质量。通过定性体裁分析,我们进一步归纳出了信息量大的 PIs 的特征。基于这些发现,我们为研究人员、编辑和审稿人最大限度地提高 PI 质量提出了具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信