Deep learning for tooth identification and numbering on dental radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Soroush Sadr, Rata Rokhshad, Yasaman Daghighi, Mohsen Golkar, Fateme Tolooie Kheybari, Fatemeh Gorjinejad, Atousa Mataji Kojori, Parisa Rahimirad, Parnian Shobeiri, Mina Mahdian, Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi
{"title":"Deep learning for tooth identification and numbering on dental radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Soroush Sadr, Rata Rokhshad, Yasaman Daghighi, Mohsen Golkar, Fateme Tolooie Kheybari, Fatemeh Gorjinejad, Atousa Mataji Kojori, Parisa Rahimirad, Parnian Shobeiri, Mina Mahdian, Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Improved tools based on deep learning can be used to accurately number and identify teeth. This study aims to review the use of deep learning in tooth numbering and identification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search was performed through October 2023 on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Google Scholar, IEEE, arXiv, and medRxiv. Studies that used deep learning models with segmentation, object detection, or classification tasks for teeth identification and numbering of human dental radiographs were included. For risk of bias assessment, included studies were critically analysed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). To generate plots for meta-analysis, MetaDiSc and STATA 17 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) were used. Pooled outcome diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were determined through calculation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 1618 studies, of which 29 were eligible based on the inclusion criteria. Five studies were found to have low bias across all domains of the QUADAS-2 tool. Deep learning has been reported to have an accuracy range of 81.8%-99% in tooth identification and numbering and a precision range of 84.5%-99.94%. Furthermore, sensitivity was reported as 82.7%-98% and F1-scores ranged from 87% to 98%. Sensitivity was 75.5%-98% and specificity was 79.9%-99%. Only 6 studies found the deep learning model to be less than 90% accurate. The average DOR of the pooled data set was 1612, the sensitivity was 89%, the specificity was 99%, and the area under the curve was 96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning models successfully can detect, identify, and number teeth on dental radiographs. Deep learning-powered tooth numbering systems can enhance complex automated processes, such as accurately reporting which teeth have caries, thus aiding clinicians in making informed decisions during clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"5-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twad001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Improved tools based on deep learning can be used to accurately number and identify teeth. This study aims to review the use of deep learning in tooth numbering and identification.

Methods: An electronic search was performed through October 2023 on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Google Scholar, IEEE, arXiv, and medRxiv. Studies that used deep learning models with segmentation, object detection, or classification tasks for teeth identification and numbering of human dental radiographs were included. For risk of bias assessment, included studies were critically analysed using quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). To generate plots for meta-analysis, MetaDiSc and STATA 17 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) were used. Pooled outcome diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were determined through calculation.

Results: The initial search yielded 1618 studies, of which 29 were eligible based on the inclusion criteria. Five studies were found to have low bias across all domains of the QUADAS-2 tool. Deep learning has been reported to have an accuracy range of 81.8%-99% in tooth identification and numbering and a precision range of 84.5%-99.94%. Furthermore, sensitivity was reported as 82.7%-98% and F1-scores ranged from 87% to 98%. Sensitivity was 75.5%-98% and specificity was 79.9%-99%. Only 6 studies found the deep learning model to be less than 90% accurate. The average DOR of the pooled data set was 1612, the sensitivity was 89%, the specificity was 99%, and the area under the curve was 96%.

Conclusion: Deep learning models successfully can detect, identify, and number teeth on dental radiographs. Deep learning-powered tooth numbering systems can enhance complex automated processes, such as accurately reporting which teeth have caries, thus aiding clinicians in making informed decisions during clinical practice.

深度学习在牙科 X 射线照相术中的牙齿识别和编号:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目标:基于深度学习的改进工具可用于准确编号和识别牙齿。本研究旨在回顾深度学习在牙齿编号和识别中的应用:在 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane、Google Scholar、IEEE、arXiv 和 medRxiv 上进行了电子检索。纳入的研究包括使用深度学习模型对人类牙科X光片进行牙齿识别和编号的分割、对象检测或分类任务。为了评估偏倚风险,使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)对纳入的研究进行了严格分析。使用 MetaDiSc 和 STATA 17(StataCorp LP,College Station,TX,USA)生成荟萃分析图。通过计算确定了汇总结果的诊断几率比(DORs):结果:初步搜索共获得 1618 项研究,其中 29 项符合纳入标准。其中有五项研究在 QUADAS-2 工具的所有领域中偏倚较低。据报道,深度学习在牙齿识别和编号方面的准确率范围为 81.8%-99%,精确度范围为 84.5%-99.94%。此外,灵敏度为 82.7%-98%,F1 分数为 87%-98%。灵敏度为 75.5%-98%,特异性为 79.9%-99%。只有 6 项研究发现深度学习模型的准确率低于 90%。汇总数据集的平均 DOR 为 1612,灵敏度为 89%,特异度为 99%,曲线下面积为 96%:深度学习模型可以成功检测、识别牙科 X 光片上的牙齿并为其编号。深度学习驱动的牙齿编号系统可以增强复杂的自动化流程,例如准确报告哪些牙齿有龋齿,从而帮助临床医生在临床实践中做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信