Facilitating the Integration of Ethical Reasoning into Quantitative Courses: Stakeholder Analysis, Ethical Practice Standards, and Case Studies

Rochelle E. Tractenberg, Suzanne Thorton
{"title":"Facilitating the Integration of Ethical Reasoning into Quantitative Courses: Stakeholder Analysis, Ethical Practice Standards, and Case Studies","authors":"Rochelle E. Tractenberg, Suzanne Thorton","doi":"arxiv-2401.01973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Case studies are typically used to teach 'ethics', but in quantitative\ncourses it can seem distracting, for both instructor and learner, to introduce\na case analysis. Moreover, case analyses are typically focused on issues\nrelating to people: obtaining consent, dealing with research team members,\nand/or potential institutional policy violations. While relevant to some\nresearch, not all students in quantitative courses plan to become researchers,\nand ethical practice is an essential topic for students of of mathematics,\nstatistics, data science, and computing regardless of whether or not the\nlearner intends to do research. Ethical reasoning is a way of thinking that\nrequires the individual to assess what they know about a potential ethical\nproblem (their prerequisite knowledge), and in some cases, how behaviors they\nobserve, are directed to perform, or have performed, diverge from what they\nknow to be ethical behavior. Ethical reasoning is a learnable, improvable set\nof knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable learners to recognize what they\ndo and do not know about what constitutes 'ethical practice' of a discipline,\nand in some cases, to contemplate alternative decisions about how to first\nrecognize, and then proceed past, or respond to, such divergences. A\nstakeholder analysis is part of prerequisite knowledge, and can be used whether\nthere is or is not an actual case or situation to react to. In courses with\nmainly quantitative content, a stakeholder analysis is a useful tool for\ninstruction and assessment. It can be used to both integrate authentic ethical\ncontent and encourage careful quantitative thought. It is a mistake to treat\n'training in ethical practice' and 'training in responsible conduct of\nresearch' as the same thing. This paper discusses how to introduce ethical\nreasoning, stakeholder analysis, and ethical practice standards authentically\nin quantitative courses.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2401.01973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Case studies are typically used to teach 'ethics', but in quantitative courses it can seem distracting, for both instructor and learner, to introduce a case analysis. Moreover, case analyses are typically focused on issues relating to people: obtaining consent, dealing with research team members, and/or potential institutional policy violations. While relevant to some research, not all students in quantitative courses plan to become researchers, and ethical practice is an essential topic for students of of mathematics, statistics, data science, and computing regardless of whether or not the learner intends to do research. Ethical reasoning is a way of thinking that requires the individual to assess what they know about a potential ethical problem (their prerequisite knowledge), and in some cases, how behaviors they observe, are directed to perform, or have performed, diverge from what they know to be ethical behavior. Ethical reasoning is a learnable, improvable set of knowledge, skills, and abilities that enable learners to recognize what they do and do not know about what constitutes 'ethical practice' of a discipline, and in some cases, to contemplate alternative decisions about how to first recognize, and then proceed past, or respond to, such divergences. A stakeholder analysis is part of prerequisite knowledge, and can be used whether there is or is not an actual case or situation to react to. In courses with mainly quantitative content, a stakeholder analysis is a useful tool for instruction and assessment. It can be used to both integrate authentic ethical content and encourage careful quantitative thought. It is a mistake to treat 'training in ethical practice' and 'training in responsible conduct of research' as the same thing. This paper discusses how to introduce ethical reasoning, stakeholder analysis, and ethical practice standards authentically in quantitative courses.
促进将道德推理融入定量课程:利益相关者分析、道德实践标准和案例研究
案例研究通常用于 "伦理 "教学,但在定量课程中,引入案例分析似乎会分散教师和学员的注意力。此外,案例分析通常侧重于与人相关的问题:获得同意、与研究团队成员打交道和/或可能违反机构政策。虽然与某些研究相关,但并非所有学习定量课程的学生都打算成为研究人员,而且无论学习者是否打算从事研究工作,道德实践都是数学、统计学、数据科学和计算机专业学生的必修课。道德推理是一种思维方式,它要求个人评估他们对潜在道德问题的了解(他们的前提知识),以及在某些情况下,他们所观察到的、被指示去做的或已经做过的行为是如何偏离他们所了解的道德行为的。伦理推理是一套可学习、可改进的知识、技能和能力,它能使学习者认识到他们对什么是学科的 "伦理实践 "知道什么和不知道什么,在某些情况下,还能使学习者思考如何首先认识到这种偏差,然后超越或应对这种偏差。利益相关者分析是先决知识的一部分,无论是否有实际案例或情况需要应对,都可以使用。在以定量内容为主的课程中,利益相关者分析是一种有用的教学和评估工具。它既可以用来整合真实的伦理内容,也可以用来鼓励认真的定量思考。把 "伦理实践培训 "和 "负责任的研究行为培训 "当作一回事是错误的。本文讨论了如何在定量课程中真实地引入伦理推理、利益相关者分析和伦理实践标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信