Preoperative Sarcopenia Assessment Using Pectoralis Muscle Mass Indicated Poor Mid-term Cardiac Surgery Prognosis.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yojiro Machii, Fumihiro Kitashima, Yuki Hayashi, Atsushi Harada, Keita Kamata, Naoki Eguchi, Masashi Tanaka
{"title":"Preoperative Sarcopenia Assessment Using Pectoralis Muscle Mass Indicated Poor Mid-term Cardiac Surgery Prognosis.","authors":"Yojiro Machii, Fumihiro Kitashima, Yuki Hayashi, Atsushi Harada, Keita Kamata, Naoki Eguchi, Masashi Tanaka","doi":"10.59958/hsf.6925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many studies have defined sarcopenia based on psoas muscle mass using abdominal computed tomography (CT). We hypothesized that sarcopenia can be assessed by measuring pectoralis muscle mass on chest CT and aimed to examine its relationship with the postoperative prognosis of cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 189 patients who underwent cardiac surgery via median sternotomy between July 2020 and June 2022. We excluded patients <70 years old, urgent/emergent cases, no chest CT within 90 days before surgery, and cases in which evaluation of the pectoralis muscle was impossible with CT. The pectoralis muscle area (PMA) was measured using a preoperative chest CT. The sarcopenia cut-off value was defined as the lowest sex-specific tertile in PMA at the level of the 4th thoracic vertebrae.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients were included. The lower tertile were classified as the sarcopenia group (SG) (n = 26) and the rest as the non-sarcopenia group (NSG) (n = 54). In the SG, 1-year survival was significantly worse than that in NSG (NSG: 92.7% vs. SG: 54.9%, p < 0.0001). In the multivariate model, sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for mid-term all-cause death (hazard ratio, 4.89; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-21.0, p = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative sarcopenia defined using PMA was associated with poor mid-term survival after elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. The pectoralis muscle mass observed through a chest CT could be used for preoperative risk scoring in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51056,"journal":{"name":"Heart Surgery Forum","volume":"26 6","pages":"E880-E888"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Surgery Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.6925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many studies have defined sarcopenia based on psoas muscle mass using abdominal computed tomography (CT). We hypothesized that sarcopenia can be assessed by measuring pectoralis muscle mass on chest CT and aimed to examine its relationship with the postoperative prognosis of cardiac surgery.

Methods: This retrospective study included 189 patients who underwent cardiac surgery via median sternotomy between July 2020 and June 2022. We excluded patients <70 years old, urgent/emergent cases, no chest CT within 90 days before surgery, and cases in which evaluation of the pectoralis muscle was impossible with CT. The pectoralis muscle area (PMA) was measured using a preoperative chest CT. The sarcopenia cut-off value was defined as the lowest sex-specific tertile in PMA at the level of the 4th thoracic vertebrae.

Results: Eighty patients were included. The lower tertile were classified as the sarcopenia group (SG) (n = 26) and the rest as the non-sarcopenia group (NSG) (n = 54). In the SG, 1-year survival was significantly worse than that in NSG (NSG: 92.7% vs. SG: 54.9%, p < 0.0001). In the multivariate model, sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for mid-term all-cause death (hazard ratio, 4.89; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-21.0, p = 0.033).

Conclusion: Preoperative sarcopenia defined using PMA was associated with poor mid-term survival after elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. The pectoralis muscle mass observed through a chest CT could be used for preoperative risk scoring in older patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

利用胸肌质量进行术前 "肌肉疏松症 "评估表明心脏手术中期预后不佳
背景:许多研究根据腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)的腰肌质量来定义肌肉疏松症。我们假设可以通过胸部 CT 测量胸肌质量来评估肌肉疏松症,并旨在研究其与心脏手术术后预后的关系:这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年7月至2022年6月期间通过胸骨正中切开术接受心脏手术的189名患者。我们排除了患者:共纳入 80 例患者。较低的三分位数被分为肌肉疏松症组(SG)(n = 26),其余为非肌肉疏松症组(NSG)(n = 54)。在 SG 组中,1 年存活率明显低于 NSG 组(NSG:92.7% vs. SG:54.9%,P < 0.0001)。在多变量模型中,肌肉疏松症是中期全因死亡的独立风险因素(危险比:4.89;95% 置信区间:1.14-21.0,P = 0.033):结论:使用 PMA 确定的术前肌少症与经胸骨正中切口进行择期心脏手术后的中期存活率较低有关。通过胸部 CT 观察到的胸肌质量可用于对接受心脏手术的老年患者进行术前风险评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Surgery Forum
Heart Surgery Forum 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Heart Surgery Forum® is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal seeking original investigative and clinical work on any subject germane to the science or practice of modern cardiac care. The HSF publishes original scientific reports, collective reviews, case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. New manuscripts are reviewed by reviewers for originality, content, relevancy and adherence to scientific principles in a double-blind process. The HSF features a streamlined submission and peer review process with an anticipated completion time of 30 to 60 days from the date of receipt of the original manuscript. Authors are encouraged to submit full color images and video that will be included in the web version of the journal at no charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信