On Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Surgery in Patients Requiring Urgent Revascularization.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yasin Kilic, Izatullah Jalalzai, Ebubekir Sonmez, Bilgehan Erkut
{"title":"On Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Surgery in Patients Requiring Urgent Revascularization.","authors":"Yasin Kilic, Izatullah Jalalzai, Ebubekir Sonmez, Bilgehan Erkut","doi":"10.59958/hsf.6923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When acute coronary syndrome patients necessitate immediate revascularization, heart-on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting may be regarded as a viable substitute for conventional on-pump surgery. Our clinical experience and initial outcomes of heart-on-pump coronary surgery in patients with acute coronary syndrome are detailed in this article.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This research endeavor was a retrospective analysis that spanned the years March 2011 to August 2023. The sample size comprised 2816 patients who had undergone coronary artery surgery. During this period, the same surgical team performed coronary artery bypass surgery on 411 of these patients, who underwent beating heart surgery while on cardiopulmonary bypass support and without cardioplegic arrest; this was done under emergency conditions.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>9.3 ± 2.2 hours elapsed between the initiation of acute myocardial infarction and the commencement of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A mean of 4.0 grafts was applied (2.2 ± 1.1). Mortality in hospitals was calculated for sixteen patients. Following surgery, twenty-six patients developed an inadequate cardiac output syndrome. Despite having renal dysfunction, none of the eight individuals needed hemodialysis. The mean duration of stay in intensive care was 3.2 (2.2 ± 1.1) days, while the mean length of hospitalization was 9.2 (4.3 ± 2.4) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We believe that for high-risk patients with multivascular coronary artery disease who require an emergency coronary artery bypass graft, on-pump beating heart revascularization could be a viable option.</p>","PeriodicalId":51056,"journal":{"name":"Heart Surgery Forum","volume":"26 6","pages":"E808-E816"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Surgery Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.6923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When acute coronary syndrome patients necessitate immediate revascularization, heart-on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting may be regarded as a viable substitute for conventional on-pump surgery. Our clinical experience and initial outcomes of heart-on-pump coronary surgery in patients with acute coronary syndrome are detailed in this article.

Method: This research endeavor was a retrospective analysis that spanned the years March 2011 to August 2023. The sample size comprised 2816 patients who had undergone coronary artery surgery. During this period, the same surgical team performed coronary artery bypass surgery on 411 of these patients, who underwent beating heart surgery while on cardiopulmonary bypass support and without cardioplegic arrest; this was done under emergency conditions.

Result: 9.3 ± 2.2 hours elapsed between the initiation of acute myocardial infarction and the commencement of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A mean of 4.0 grafts was applied (2.2 ± 1.1). Mortality in hospitals was calculated for sixteen patients. Following surgery, twenty-six patients developed an inadequate cardiac output syndrome. Despite having renal dysfunction, none of the eight individuals needed hemodialysis. The mean duration of stay in intensive care was 3.2 (2.2 ± 1.1) days, while the mean length of hospitalization was 9.2 (4.3 ± 2.4) days.

Conclusion: We believe that for high-risk patients with multivascular coronary artery disease who require an emergency coronary artery bypass graft, on-pump beating heart revascularization could be a viable option.

关于需要紧急血管重建的患者的泵打心脏冠状动脉手术。
背景:当急性冠状动脉综合征患者需要立即进行血管重建时,泵上心脏冠状动脉旁路移植术可被视为传统泵上手术的可行替代方案。本文详细介绍了我们对急性冠状动脉综合征患者实施泵上心脏冠状动脉手术的临床经验和初步结果:这项研究工作是一项回顾性分析,时间跨度为 2011 年 3 月至 2023 年 8 月。样本量包括 2816 名接受冠状动脉手术的患者。结果:从急性心肌梗死开始到冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)开始之间的时间为 9.3±2.2 小时。平均移植时间为 4.0 小时(2.2 ± 1.1)。计算了 16 名患者的住院死亡率。手术后,26 名患者出现了心输出量不足综合征。尽管存在肾功能障碍,但八名患者都不需要进行血液透析。重症监护的平均住院时间为 3.2(2.2 ± 1.1)天,平均住院时间为 9.2(4.3 ± 2.4)天:我们认为,对于需要紧急进行冠状动脉旁路移植手术的多血管冠状动脉疾病高危患者来说,泵上心脏跳动再通术是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Surgery Forum
Heart Surgery Forum 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Heart Surgery Forum® is an international peer-reviewed, open access journal seeking original investigative and clinical work on any subject germane to the science or practice of modern cardiac care. The HSF publishes original scientific reports, collective reviews, case reports, editorials, and letters to the editor. New manuscripts are reviewed by reviewers for originality, content, relevancy and adherence to scientific principles in a double-blind process. The HSF features a streamlined submission and peer review process with an anticipated completion time of 30 to 60 days from the date of receipt of the original manuscript. Authors are encouraged to submit full color images and video that will be included in the web version of the journal at no charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信