Referral rates and barriers to lung transplantation based on pulmonary function criteria in interstitial lung diseases: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Ofir Deri, David Ovadia, Ella Huszti, Michael Peled, Milton Saute, Tammy Hod, Amir Onn, Lior Seluk, Nadav Furie, Inbal Shafran, Ronen Mass, Sumit Chatterji, Liran Levy
{"title":"Referral rates and barriers to lung transplantation based on pulmonary function criteria in interstitial lung diseases: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ofir Deri, David Ovadia, Ella Huszti, Michael Peled, Milton Saute, Tammy Hod, Amir Onn, Lior Seluk, Nadav Furie, Inbal Shafran, Ronen Mass, Sumit Chatterji, Liran Levy","doi":"10.1177/17534666231221750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) unresponsive to medical therapy often require lung transplantation (LTx), which prolongs quality of life and survival. Ideal timing for referral for LTx remains challenging, with late referral associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among other criteria, patients with ILD should be considered for LTx if forced vital capacity (FVC) is less than 80% or diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is less than 40%. However, data on referral rates are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate referral rates for LTx based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and identify barriers associated with non-referral.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study consisted of ILD patients who performed PFT between 2014 and 2020. Patients with FVC < 80% or a DLCO < 40% were included in the study. Patients with absolute contraindications to LTx were excluded. Referral rates were computed, and a comparison was made between referred and non-referred subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 114 ILD patients meeting criteria for referral to LTx, 35 were referred (30.7%), and 7 proceeded to undergo LTx. Median time from PFT to referral for assessment was 255 days [interquartile range (IQR) 35-1077]. Median time from referral to LTx was 89 days (IQR 59-143). Referred patients were younger (<i>p</i> = 0.003), had lower FVC (<i>p</i> < 0.001), DLCO (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and a higher rate of pulmonary hypertension (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Relatively better PFT, and older age, were significantly associated with non-referral of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is under-referral of ILD patients who are eligible for LTx, which is associated with severe disease and missed opportunities for LTx. Further research is required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10771041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666231221750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) unresponsive to medical therapy often require lung transplantation (LTx), which prolongs quality of life and survival. Ideal timing for referral for LTx remains challenging, with late referral associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among other criteria, patients with ILD should be considered for LTx if forced vital capacity (FVC) is less than 80% or diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is less than 40%. However, data on referral rates are lacking.

Objectives: To evaluate referral rates for LTx based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and identify barriers associated with non-referral.

Design: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Methods: The study consisted of ILD patients who performed PFT between 2014 and 2020. Patients with FVC < 80% or a DLCO < 40% were included in the study. Patients with absolute contraindications to LTx were excluded. Referral rates were computed, and a comparison was made between referred and non-referred subjects.

Results: Out of 114 ILD patients meeting criteria for referral to LTx, 35 were referred (30.7%), and 7 proceeded to undergo LTx. Median time from PFT to referral for assessment was 255 days [interquartile range (IQR) 35-1077]. Median time from referral to LTx was 89 days (IQR 59-143). Referred patients were younger (p = 0.003), had lower FVC (p < 0.001), DLCO (p < 0.001), and a higher rate of pulmonary hypertension (p = 0.04). Relatively better PFT, and older age, were significantly associated with non-referral of patients.

Conclusion: There is under-referral of ILD patients who are eligible for LTx, which is associated with severe disease and missed opportunities for LTx. Further research is required to validate these findings.

基于肺功能标准的间质性肺病肺移植转诊率和障碍:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:对药物治疗无效的间质性肺病(ILD)通常需要进行肺移植(LTx),以延长患者的生活质量和生存期。转诊进行肺移植的理想时机仍具有挑战性,转诊过晚与严重的发病率和死亡率有关。除其他标准外,如果强迫生命容量(FVC)小于 80%,或一氧化碳弥散容量(DLCO)小于 40%,ILD 患者应考虑接受 LTx。然而,目前还缺乏有关转诊率的数据:评估基于肺功能检测(PFT)的LTx转诊率,并确定与不转诊相关的障碍:设计:单中心回顾性队列研究:研究对象为 2014 年至 2020 年期间进行过 PFT 检查的 ILD 患者。患者的 FVC 结果:在符合LTx转诊标准的114例ILD患者中,35例(30.7%)被转诊,7例接受了LTx治疗。从PFT到转诊评估的中位时间为255天[四分位距(IQR)35-1077]。从转诊到LTx的中位时间为89天(IQR为59-143)。转诊患者更年轻(P = 0.003),FVC 更低(P = 0.04)。PFT相对较好和年龄较大与未转诊患者明显相关:结论:符合长期治疗条件的 ILD 患者转诊不足,这与病情严重和错过长期治疗机会有关。需要进一步研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信