Deep learning-based prediction of coronary artery calcium scoring in hemodialysis patients using radial artery calcification.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Seminars in Dialysis Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1111/sdi.13191
Yuankai Xu, Wen Li, Yanli Yang, Shiyi Dong, Fulei Meng, Kaidi Zhang, Yuhuan Wang, Lin Ruan, Lihong Zhang
{"title":"Deep learning-based prediction of coronary artery calcium scoring in hemodialysis patients using radial artery calcification.","authors":"Yuankai Xu, Wen Li, Yanli Yang, Shiyi Dong, Fulei Meng, Kaidi Zhang, Yuhuan Wang, Lin Ruan, Lihong Zhang","doi":"10.1111/sdi.13191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study used random forest model to explore the feasibility of radial artery calcification in prediction of coronary artery calcification in hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We enrolled hemodialysis patients and performed ultrasound examinations on their radial arteries to evaluate the calcification status using a calcification index. All involved patients received coronary artery computed tomography scans to generate coronary artery calcification scores (CACS). Clinical variables were collected from all patients. We constructed both a random forest model and a logistic regression model to predict CACS. Logistic regression model was used to identify the risk factors of radial artery calcification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighteen patients were included in our analysis. In random forest model, the radial artery calcification index, age, serum C-reactive protein, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and hypertension history were related to CACS based on the average decrease of the Gini coefficient. The random forest model achieved a sensitivity of 76.9%, specificity of 75.0%, and area under receiver operating characteristic of 0.869, while the logistic regression model achieved a sensitivity of 75.2%, specificity of 68.7%, and area under receiver operating characteristic of 0.742 in prediction of CACS. Sex, BMI index, smoking history, hypertension history, diabetes history, and serum total calcium were all the risk factors related to radial artery calcification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A random forest model based on radial artery calcification could be used to predict CACS in hemodialysis patients, providing a potential method for rapid screening and prediction of coronary artery calcification.</p>","PeriodicalId":21675,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Dialysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.13191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study used random forest model to explore the feasibility of radial artery calcification in prediction of coronary artery calcification in hemodialysis patients.

Material and methods: We enrolled hemodialysis patients and performed ultrasound examinations on their radial arteries to evaluate the calcification status using a calcification index. All involved patients received coronary artery computed tomography scans to generate coronary artery calcification scores (CACS). Clinical variables were collected from all patients. We constructed both a random forest model and a logistic regression model to predict CACS. Logistic regression model was used to identify the risk factors of radial artery calcification.

Results: One hundred eighteen patients were included in our analysis. In random forest model, the radial artery calcification index, age, serum C-reactive protein, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and hypertension history were related to CACS based on the average decrease of the Gini coefficient. The random forest model achieved a sensitivity of 76.9%, specificity of 75.0%, and area under receiver operating characteristic of 0.869, while the logistic regression model achieved a sensitivity of 75.2%, specificity of 68.7%, and area under receiver operating characteristic of 0.742 in prediction of CACS. Sex, BMI index, smoking history, hypertension history, diabetes history, and serum total calcium were all the risk factors related to radial artery calcification.

Conclusions: A random forest model based on radial artery calcification could be used to predict CACS in hemodialysis patients, providing a potential method for rapid screening and prediction of coronary artery calcification.

基于深度学习的桡动脉钙化预测血液透析患者冠状动脉钙化评分。
目的本研究采用随机森林模型探讨桡动脉钙化在预测血液透析患者冠状动脉钙化中的可行性:我们招募了血液透析患者,并对他们的桡动脉进行了超声检查,使用钙化指数评估钙化状况。所有患者都接受了冠状动脉计算机断层扫描,以生成冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)。我们收集了所有患者的临床变量。我们构建了随机森林模型和逻辑回归模型来预测 CACS。逻辑回归模型用于确定桡动脉钙化的风险因素:我们的分析共纳入了 118 名患者。在随机森林模型中,桡动脉钙化指数、年龄、血清 C 反应蛋白、体重指数(BMI)、糖尿病和高血压病史与 CACS 的关系是基于基尼系数的平均下降率。随机森林模型预测 CACS 的灵敏度为 76.9%,特异性为 75.0%,接收器操作特征下面积为 0.869;逻辑回归模型预测 CACS 的灵敏度为 75.2%,特异性为 68.7%,接收器操作特征下面积为 0.742。性别、体重指数、吸烟史、高血压史、糖尿病史和血清总钙都是与桡动脉钙化相关的风险因素:基于桡动脉钙化的随机森林模型可用于预测血液透析患者的 CACS,为快速筛查和预测冠状动脉钙化提供了一种潜在的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Dialysis
Seminars in Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Dialysis is a bimonthly publication focusing exclusively on cutting-edge clinical aspects of dialysis therapy. Besides publishing papers by the most respected names in the field of dialysis, the Journal has unique useful features, all designed to keep you current: -Fellows Forum -Dialysis rounds -Editorials -Opinions -Briefly noted -Summary and Comment -Guest Edited Issues -Special Articles Virtually everything you read in Seminars in Dialysis is written or solicited by the editors after choosing the most effective of nine different editorial styles and formats. They know that facts, speculations, ''how-to-do-it'' information, opinions, and news reports all play important roles in your education and the patient care you provide. Alternate issues of the journal are guest edited and focus on a single clinical topic in dialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信