Contraceptive Methods Women Have Ever Used:United States, 2015-2019.

Q2 Medicine
National health statistics reports Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Kimberly Daniels, Joyce C Abma
{"title":"Contraceptive Methods Women Have Ever Used:United States, 2015-2019.","authors":"Kimberly Daniels, Joyce C Abma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective-This report describes methods of contraception ever used by U.S. women ages 15-49 who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner. Estimates are shown overall and by Hispanic origin and race, education, religious affiliation and importance, and urban-rural residence. Discontinuation of selected contraceptive methods is also described. Methods-This report focuses on information collected from the 11,695 women ages 15-49 interviewed in the 2015-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics. Most estimates shown are based on data on contraceptive methods ever used by the 10,122 interviewed women who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner. Results-Based on 2015-2019 data, virtually all women of reproductive age who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner used at least one contraceptive method at some point in their life up to the time of interview (99.2%, or 63.2 million women ages 15-49), including 87.8% who had ever used a \"most or moderately effective reversible method\": the pill, an injectable, contraceptive patch, contraceptive ring, contraceptive implant, or intrauterine device. Most women had used the male condom with a partner (94.5%), the pill (79.8%), or withdrawal (65.7%). About one in four women reported ever using long-acting reversible contraception (intrauterine device or contraceptive implant) (24.9%) or emergency contraception (23.5%). The type of methods ever used varied by Hispanic origin and race, nativity among Hispanic women, education, religious affiliation and importance, and urban-rural residence. Among women who had ever discontinued use of the pill or intrauterine devices due to dissatisfaction (and not for seeking a pregnancy), side effects were the most common reason.</p>","PeriodicalId":18840,"journal":{"name":"National health statistics reports","volume":" 195","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National health statistics reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective-This report describes methods of contraception ever used by U.S. women ages 15-49 who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner. Estimates are shown overall and by Hispanic origin and race, education, religious affiliation and importance, and urban-rural residence. Discontinuation of selected contraceptive methods is also described. Methods-This report focuses on information collected from the 11,695 women ages 15-49 interviewed in the 2015-2019 National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics. Most estimates shown are based on data on contraceptive methods ever used by the 10,122 interviewed women who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner. Results-Based on 2015-2019 data, virtually all women of reproductive age who had ever had sexual intercourse with a male partner used at least one contraceptive method at some point in their life up to the time of interview (99.2%, or 63.2 million women ages 15-49), including 87.8% who had ever used a "most or moderately effective reversible method": the pill, an injectable, contraceptive patch, contraceptive ring, contraceptive implant, or intrauterine device. Most women had used the male condom with a partner (94.5%), the pill (79.8%), or withdrawal (65.7%). About one in four women reported ever using long-acting reversible contraception (intrauterine device or contraceptive implant) (24.9%) or emergency contraception (23.5%). The type of methods ever used varied by Hispanic origin and race, nativity among Hispanic women, education, religious affiliation and importance, and urban-rural residence. Among women who had ever discontinued use of the pill or intrauterine devices due to dissatisfaction (and not for seeking a pregnancy), side effects were the most common reason.

2015-2019 年美国妇女使用过的避孕方法。
目的--本报告介绍了曾与男性伴侣发生过性关系的 15-49 岁美国女性曾经使用过的避孕方法。报告显示了总体估计数,以及按西班牙裔和种族、教育程度、宗教信仰和重要性以及城乡居住地分列的估计数。报告还介绍了某些避孕方法的停用情况。方法--本报告侧重于从 2015-2019 年全国家庭增长调查中采访的 11,695 名 15-49 岁女性中收集的信息,该调查是由美国疾病控制和预防中心的国家卫生统计中心开展的一项具有全国代表性的调查。显示的大部分估算值都是基于曾与男性伴侣发生过性关系的 10122 名受访女性曾经使用过的避孕方法数据。结果 基于 2015-2019 年的数据,几乎所有曾与男性伴侣发生过性关系的育龄女性在接受访谈前的某个阶段都至少使用过一种避孕方法(99.2%,即 6320 万 15-49 岁女性),其中 87.8% 曾使用过 "最有效或中等有效的可逆方法":避孕药、注射剂、避孕贴、避孕环、避孕植入物或宫内节育器。大多数女性曾与伴侣一起使用过男用避孕套(94.5%)、避孕药(79.8%)或体外射精(65.7%)。约四分之一的女性表示曾经使用过长效可逆避孕药(宫内避孕器或避孕植入物)(24.9%)或紧急避孕药(23.5%)。曾经使用过的避孕方法类型因西班牙裔出身和种族、西班牙裔妇女的原籍、教育程度、宗教信仰和重要性以及城乡居住地而异。在曾因不满意而停止使用避孕药或宫内节育器的妇女中(而不是因为想要怀孕),副作用是最常见的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
National health statistics reports
National health statistics reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Notice: Effective January 2008 the title, National Health Statistics Reports (NHSR), replaces Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics (AD). NHSRs will be numbered sequentially beginning with 1. The last AD report number is 395. These reports provide annual data summaries, present analyses of health topics, or present new information on methods or measurement issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信