Infliximab Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy for Pediatric Crohn's Disease Exhibit Similar Pharmacokinetics.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ruben J Colman, Stephanie A Vuijk, Ron A A Mathôt, Johan Van Limbergen, Maria M E Jongsma, Marco W J Schreurs, Phillip Minar, Lissy de Ridder, Geert R A M D'Haens
{"title":"Infliximab Monotherapy vs Combination Therapy for Pediatric Crohn's Disease Exhibit Similar Pharmacokinetics.","authors":"Ruben J Colman, Stephanie A Vuijk, Ron A A Mathôt, Johan Van Limbergen, Maria M E Jongsma, Marco W J Schreurs, Phillip Minar, Lissy de Ridder, Geert R A M D'Haens","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izad307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of concomitant azathioprine may improve efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of infliximab (IFX) but is also associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (pTDM) of IFX monotherapy is an alternative strategy to improve PK. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether IFX with an immunomodulator (combo) has PK benefits over IFX-pTDM (mono) in pediatric Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This PK analysis included pediatric CD patients who started either IFX combo (TISKids study) or IFX mono with pTDM (REFINE cohort). Combo and mono IFX trough levels (TLs) and antibodies-to-infliximab were assessed at infusion 3, 4, and 5. A population PK model was built to compare IFX PK outcomes (clearance [CL], TLs and cumulative exposure) between combo and mono groups at infusion 4 and 5. Clinical response and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) was assessed at infusion 4 and 5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 128 pediatric CD patients (66 mono and 62 combo). At infusion 5, there was no significant difference between mono and combo median TLs 4.1 µg/mL (2.1, 7.8) vs 5.9 µg/mL (3.2, 9.4; P = .14) or median CL 0.26 L/d (0.21, 0.32) vs 0.26 L/d (0.21, 0.33; P = .81). Mono patients had a lower SFCR rate at infusion 5 (53% [31 of 59] vs 80% [32 of 40]; P = .01). Clinical response rates were significantly higher among combo than mono patients at both infusion 4 and 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that there are no PK differences (TLs and CL) between combo and mono therapy in pediatric CD patients who started IFX.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of concomitant azathioprine may improve efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of infliximab (IFX) but is also associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (pTDM) of IFX monotherapy is an alternative strategy to improve PK. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether IFX with an immunomodulator (combo) has PK benefits over IFX-pTDM (mono) in pediatric Crohn's disease (CD).

Methods: This PK analysis included pediatric CD patients who started either IFX combo (TISKids study) or IFX mono with pTDM (REFINE cohort). Combo and mono IFX trough levels (TLs) and antibodies-to-infliximab were assessed at infusion 3, 4, and 5. A population PK model was built to compare IFX PK outcomes (clearance [CL], TLs and cumulative exposure) between combo and mono groups at infusion 4 and 5. Clinical response and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) was assessed at infusion 4 and 5.

Results: This study included 128 pediatric CD patients (66 mono and 62 combo). At infusion 5, there was no significant difference between mono and combo median TLs 4.1 µg/mL (2.1, 7.8) vs 5.9 µg/mL (3.2, 9.4; P = .14) or median CL 0.26 L/d (0.21, 0.32) vs 0.26 L/d (0.21, 0.33; P = .81). Mono patients had a lower SFCR rate at infusion 5 (53% [31 of 59] vs 80% [32 of 40]; P = .01). Clinical response rates were significantly higher among combo than mono patients at both infusion 4 and 5.

Conclusions: This study suggests that there are no PK differences (TLs and CL) between combo and mono therapy in pediatric CD patients who started IFX.

英夫利西单抗与联合疗法治疗小儿克罗恩病的药代动力学相似。
背景:同时使用硫唑嘌呤可提高英夫利西单抗(IFX)的疗效和药代动力学(PK)特性,但也会增加不良反应的风险。IFX单药治疗的主动治疗药物监测(pTDM)是改善PK的另一种策略。本研究旨在评估在小儿克罗恩病(CD)中,IFX联合免疫调节剂(combo)是否比IFX-pTDM(单药)具有PK优势:该PK分析包括开始使用IFX组合(TISKids研究)或IFX单药与pTDM(REFINE队列)的小儿克罗恩病患者。在输注第 3、4 和 5 次时评估了 IFX 复方和单方的谷值 (TL) 和英夫利昔单抗抗体。建立了一个群体 PK 模型,以比较联合组和单药组在输注第 4 次和第 5 次时的 IFX PK 结果(清除率 [CL]、TLs 和累积暴露量)。在输注第4次和第5次时评估临床反应和无类固醇临床缓解(SFCR):这项研究包括 128 名儿童 CD 患者(66 名单药组和 62 名复合药组)。输注第 5 次时,单药和复方中位 TL 4.1 µg/mL (2.1, 7.8) vs 5.9 µg/mL (3.2, 9.4; P = .14) 或中位 CL 0.26 L/d (0.21, 0.32) vs 0.26 L/d (0.21, 0.33; P = .81) 之间无显著差异。单药患者在输注第 5 次时的 SFCR 率较低(53% [59 例中的 31 例] vs 80% [40 例中的 32 例];P = .01)。在第 4 次和第 5 次输注时,组合患者的临床应答率均明显高于单一患者:本研究表明,在开始接受 IFX 治疗的儿童 CD 患者中,联合疗法和单一疗法之间不存在 PK 差异(TL 和 CL)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信