Information security and privacy challenges of cloud computing for government adoption: a systematic review

IF 2.4 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ndukwe Ukeje, Jairo Gutierrez, Krassie Petrova
{"title":"Information security and privacy challenges of cloud computing for government adoption: a systematic review","authors":"Ndukwe Ukeje, Jairo Gutierrez, Krassie Petrova","doi":"10.1007/s10207-023-00797-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The advent of new technologies and applications coupled with the COVID-19 pandemic tremendously increased cloud computing adoption in private and public institutions (government) and raised the demand for communication and access to a shared pool of resources and storage capabilities. Governments across the globe are moving to the cloud to improve services, reduce costs, and increase effectiveness and efficiency while fostering innovation and citizen engagement. However, information security and privacy concerns raised in the past remain significant to government adoption and utilisation of cloud computing. The study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach to examine information security and privacy as the fundamental challenges to government intention to adopt cloud computing. This study screened 758 articles and included 33 articles that revealed information security and privacy as critical factors and barriers to adopting cloud computing through a systematic evaluation (PRISMA approach). The combined two factors contributed 70% of the significant gaps to the cloud computing adoption challenges. In contrast, the individual contribution of information security and privacy as a significant gap to the challenges of cloud adoption yielded 9% and 12%, respectively. Furthermore, 9% of the authors recognised the need for a framework to address the challenges but could not attempt to develop the framework. The study contributes to the information security body of knowledge, PRISMA studies and provides direction in proposing strategies and frameworks to tackle information security and privacy challenges as future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50316,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Security","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-023-00797-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of new technologies and applications coupled with the COVID-19 pandemic tremendously increased cloud computing adoption in private and public institutions (government) and raised the demand for communication and access to a shared pool of resources and storage capabilities. Governments across the globe are moving to the cloud to improve services, reduce costs, and increase effectiveness and efficiency while fostering innovation and citizen engagement. However, information security and privacy concerns raised in the past remain significant to government adoption and utilisation of cloud computing. The study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach to examine information security and privacy as the fundamental challenges to government intention to adopt cloud computing. This study screened 758 articles and included 33 articles that revealed information security and privacy as critical factors and barriers to adopting cloud computing through a systematic evaluation (PRISMA approach). The combined two factors contributed 70% of the significant gaps to the cloud computing adoption challenges. In contrast, the individual contribution of information security and privacy as a significant gap to the challenges of cloud adoption yielded 9% and 12%, respectively. Furthermore, 9% of the authors recognised the need for a framework to address the challenges but could not attempt to develop the framework. The study contributes to the information security body of knowledge, PRISMA studies and provides direction in proposing strategies and frameworks to tackle information security and privacy challenges as future research.

Abstract Image

政府采用云计算面临的信息安全和隐私挑战:系统综述
新技术和新应用的出现以及 COVID-19 大流行极大地增加了云计算在私营和公共机构(政府)中的应用,并提高了对通信和访问共享资源池及存储能力的需求。全球各地的政府都在向云计算迁移,以改善服务、降低成本、提高效力和效率,同时促进创新和公民参与。然而,过去提出的信息安全和隐私问题仍然是政府采用和利用云计算的重要障碍。本研究采用系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法进行了系统文献综述(SLR),以研究信息安全和隐私是政府采用云计算的基本挑战。本研究筛选了 758 篇文章,并通过系统评估(PRISMA 方法)纳入了 33 篇揭示信息安全和隐私是采用云计算的关键因素和障碍的文章。在采用云计算所面临的挑战中,这两个因素的综合影响占了重要差距的 70%。与此相反,信息安全和隐私作为采用云计算挑战的重要差距的单独贡献率分别为 9% 和 12%。此外,9% 的作者认识到需要一个框架来应对挑战,但无法尝试开发该框架。本研究为信息安全知识体系、PRISMA 研究做出了贡献,并为提出应对信息安全和隐私挑战的策略和框架作为未来研究提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Security
International Journal of Information Security 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Security is an English language periodical on research in information security which offers prompt publication of important technical work, whether theoretical, applicable, or related to implementation. Coverage includes system security: intrusion detection, secure end systems, secure operating systems, database security, security infrastructures, security evaluation; network security: Internet security, firewalls, mobile security, security agents, protocols, anti-virus and anti-hacker measures; content protection: watermarking, software protection, tamper resistant software; applications: electronic commerce, government, health, telecommunications, mobility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信