Epidemiologic data on acute gastrointestinal bleeding in Albania: an overview of upper and lower GI bleeding

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Edite Sadiku, Liri Cuko, Ina Pasho, Orion Jucja, Stela Taci, Kliti Hoti, Bledar Kraja
{"title":"Epidemiologic data on acute gastrointestinal bleeding in Albania: an overview of upper and lower GI bleeding","authors":"Edite Sadiku, Liri Cuko, Ina Pasho, Orion Jucja, Stela Taci, Kliti Hoti, Bledar Kraja","doi":"10.1186/s43066-023-00304-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a significant medical condition that poses a considerable burden on healthcare systems worldwide. To effectively manage and improve outcomes for patients, it is essential to have comprehensive epidemiologic data on GIB, including its various aspects such as upper and lower GIB, treatment modalities, and overall mortality rates. The objective of this study is to present the first epidemiological data on acute gastrointestinal bleeding in our country, which includes a comprehensive analysis of upper and lower AGIB, as well as the use of endoscopic and surgical treatments, and an assessment of overall mortality rates for the year 2015. A retrospective analysis of medical records and databases was conducted to gather epidemiologic data related to acute GIB cases during the specified period. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, diagnostic findings, treatment approaches (including endoscopic and surgical interventions), and overall mortality rates were evaluated and analyzed. The study included a total of 926 patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding during 2015. Among them, 70% presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), while 30% had lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). The remaining cases involved both upper and lower GIB. Regarding treatment modalities, 80% of patients with UGIB underwent endoscopic interventions, which included various techniques such as endoscopic hemostasis, band ligation, and sclerotherapy. On the other hand, 60% of patients with LGIB required surgical intervention due to the severity or complexity of their bleeding. The overall mortality rate for acute GIB during the study period was calculated to be 8%. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with UGIB had a mortality rate of 5%, while patients with LGIB had a mortality rate of 10%. This study provides important epidemiologic data on acute gastrointestinal bleeding, focusing on upper and lower GIB, endoscopic and surgical treatment approaches, and overall mortality rates during the year 2015 in Albania. It refers to the first data, not published and gathered on this therapeutic field, that can be used as a reference for comparison in the latest publications and reports. Our study results showed that the higher incidence of UGIB compared to LGIB highlights the need for focused attention on upper gastrointestinal pathologies as significant contributors to GIB cases. The utilization of endoscopic interventions as the primary treatment modality for UGIB indicates the effectiveness and importance of timely endoscopic evaluation and intervention in controlling bleeding and improving patient outcomes. Based on the findings of this initial study, our future research endeavors were primarily focused on investigating patients within the upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) cohort.","PeriodicalId":11620,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Liver Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Liver Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-023-00304-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a significant medical condition that poses a considerable burden on healthcare systems worldwide. To effectively manage and improve outcomes for patients, it is essential to have comprehensive epidemiologic data on GIB, including its various aspects such as upper and lower GIB, treatment modalities, and overall mortality rates. The objective of this study is to present the first epidemiological data on acute gastrointestinal bleeding in our country, which includes a comprehensive analysis of upper and lower AGIB, as well as the use of endoscopic and surgical treatments, and an assessment of overall mortality rates for the year 2015. A retrospective analysis of medical records and databases was conducted to gather epidemiologic data related to acute GIB cases during the specified period. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, diagnostic findings, treatment approaches (including endoscopic and surgical interventions), and overall mortality rates were evaluated and analyzed. The study included a total of 926 patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding during 2015. Among them, 70% presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), while 30% had lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). The remaining cases involved both upper and lower GIB. Regarding treatment modalities, 80% of patients with UGIB underwent endoscopic interventions, which included various techniques such as endoscopic hemostasis, band ligation, and sclerotherapy. On the other hand, 60% of patients with LGIB required surgical intervention due to the severity or complexity of their bleeding. The overall mortality rate for acute GIB during the study period was calculated to be 8%. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with UGIB had a mortality rate of 5%, while patients with LGIB had a mortality rate of 10%. This study provides important epidemiologic data on acute gastrointestinal bleeding, focusing on upper and lower GIB, endoscopic and surgical treatment approaches, and overall mortality rates during the year 2015 in Albania. It refers to the first data, not published and gathered on this therapeutic field, that can be used as a reference for comparison in the latest publications and reports. Our study results showed that the higher incidence of UGIB compared to LGIB highlights the need for focused attention on upper gastrointestinal pathologies as significant contributors to GIB cases. The utilization of endoscopic interventions as the primary treatment modality for UGIB indicates the effectiveness and importance of timely endoscopic evaluation and intervention in controlling bleeding and improving patient outcomes. Based on the findings of this initial study, our future research endeavors were primarily focused on investigating patients within the upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) cohort.
阿尔巴尼亚急性消化道出血的流行病学数据:上消化道和下消化道出血概述
急性消化道出血(GIB)是一种严重的疾病,给全世界的医疗系统带来了沉重的负担。为了有效管理和改善患者的预后,必须掌握有关 GIB 的全面流行病学数据,包括其各个方面,如上、下消化道出血、治疗方式和总体死亡率。本研究的目的是首次展示我国急性消化道出血的流行病学数据,其中包括对上消化道出血和下消化道出血的全面分析、内窥镜和手术治疗的使用情况,以及对2015年总体死亡率的评估。研究人员对医疗记录和数据库进行了回顾性分析,以收集特定时期内急性 GIB 病例的相关流行病学数据。研究对患者的人口统计学特征、临床特征、诊断结果、治疗方法(包括内窥镜和手术干预)以及总体死亡率进行了评估和分析。研究共纳入了2015年期间的926名急性消化道出血患者。其中,70%为上消化道出血(UGIB),30%为下消化道出血(LGIB)。其余病例既有上消化道出血,也有下消化道出血。在治疗方法方面,80%的 UGIB 患者接受了内镜干预,包括内镜止血、带状结扎和硬化疗法等多种技术。另一方面,60% 的 LGIB 患者因出血严重或复杂而需要手术治疗。据统计,研究期间急性 GIB 的总死亡率为 8%。分组分析显示,UGIB 患者的死亡率为 5%,而 LGIB 患者的死亡率为 10%。这项研究提供了关于急性消化道出血的重要流行病学数据,重点关注2015年阿尔巴尼亚的上消化道出血、内镜和手术治疗方法以及总死亡率。这是有关该治疗领域的首批未公开和收集的数据,可作为最新出版物和报告的对比参考。我们的研究结果表明,与LGIB相比,UGIB的发病率更高,这凸显出需要重点关注上消化道病变,因为上消化道病变是GIB病例的重要诱因。使用内镜干预作为 UGIB 的主要治疗方式表明,及时进行内镜评估和干预对于控制出血和改善患者预后非常有效和重要。根据这项初步研究的结果,我们未来的研究工作主要集中在调查上消化道出血(UGIB)患者群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Liver Journal
Egyptian Liver Journal Medicine-Hepatology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
9 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信