{"title":"Exploring the frequency contours in close reading texts","authors":"Heidi Anne E. Mesmer","doi":"10.1007/s11145-023-10493-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many initiatives have emphasized the importance of challenging students in text using readability formulas. Almost all formulas employ mean word frequency yet long-standing issues abound. Researchers question using a singular mean with a skewed variable like frequency. They also question the degree to which frequency pinpoints complex words, noting that infrequent words can be rare, but not rich (e.g., smock). Unfortunately, no studies have examined how often this phenomenon occurs. In fact, word frequency is a “black box” because we do not know the <i>actual</i> words represented at different frequency points. This study used a new frequency metric to analyze 249 texts designed for close reading. Texts averaged 640 words and were written for Grades 2–8. For each text, curves were compared by grade and type. Words at each point on the curve were identified and analyzed. Findings illustrated the curves of word frequency throughout a text and unpacked the actual words at different points along the curves. Regardless of grade or type, curves were nearly identical in shape. Curves were characterized by four frequency strata. At the lowest frequency level were the rich, rare words that advance learning. However, analyses showed that between 34 and 72% of the time these least frequent words were rare but not rich, a pattern that occurred more frequently in narrative texts. Findings also showed that narratives were characterized by one very rare word that could influence the mean word frequency. The study included a series of graphics illustrating the functions of words at different tiers and listing the words along the curves.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10493-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many initiatives have emphasized the importance of challenging students in text using readability formulas. Almost all formulas employ mean word frequency yet long-standing issues abound. Researchers question using a singular mean with a skewed variable like frequency. They also question the degree to which frequency pinpoints complex words, noting that infrequent words can be rare, but not rich (e.g., smock). Unfortunately, no studies have examined how often this phenomenon occurs. In fact, word frequency is a “black box” because we do not know the actual words represented at different frequency points. This study used a new frequency metric to analyze 249 texts designed for close reading. Texts averaged 640 words and were written for Grades 2–8. For each text, curves were compared by grade and type. Words at each point on the curve were identified and analyzed. Findings illustrated the curves of word frequency throughout a text and unpacked the actual words at different points along the curves. Regardless of grade or type, curves were nearly identical in shape. Curves were characterized by four frequency strata. At the lowest frequency level were the rich, rare words that advance learning. However, analyses showed that between 34 and 72% of the time these least frequent words were rare but not rich, a pattern that occurred more frequently in narrative texts. Findings also showed that narratives were characterized by one very rare word that could influence the mean word frequency. The study included a series of graphics illustrating the functions of words at different tiers and listing the words along the curves.
期刊介绍:
Reading and writing skills are fundamental to literacy. Consequently, the processes involved in reading and writing and the failure to acquire these skills, as well as the loss of once well-developed reading and writing abilities have been the targets of intense research activity involving professionals from a variety of disciplines, such as neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics and education. The findings that have emanated from this research are most often written up in a lingua that is specific to the particular discipline involved, and are published in specialized journals. This generally leaves the expert in one area almost totally unaware of what may be taking place in any area other than their own. Reading and Writing cuts through this fog of jargon, breaking down the artificial boundaries between disciplines. The journal focuses on the interaction among various fields, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Reading and Writing publishes high-quality, scientific articles pertaining to the processes, acquisition, and loss of reading and writing skills. The journal fully represents the necessarily interdisciplinary nature of research in the field, focusing on the interaction among various disciplines, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Coverage in Reading and Writing includes models of reading, writing and spelling at all age levels; orthography and its relation to reading and writing; computer literacy; cross-cultural studies; and developmental and acquired disorders of reading and writing. It publishes research articles, critical reviews, theoretical papers, and case studies. Reading and Writing is one of the most highly cited journals in Education, Educational Research, and Educational Psychology.