Addition of polygenic risk score to a risk calculator for prediction of breast cancer in US Black women

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Gary R. Zirpoli, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Dezheng Huo, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Julie R. Palmer
{"title":"Addition of polygenic risk score to a risk calculator for prediction of breast cancer in US Black women","authors":"Gary R. Zirpoli, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Dezheng Huo, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Julie R. Palmer","doi":"10.1186/s13058-023-01748-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous work in European ancestry populations has shown that adding a polygenic risk score (PRS) to breast cancer risk prediction models based on epidemiologic factors results in better discriminatory performance as measured by the AUC (area under the curve). Following publication of the first PRS to perform well in women of African ancestry (AA-PRS), we conducted an external validation of the AA-PRS and then evaluated the addition of the AA-PRS to a risk calculator for incident breast cancer in Black women based on epidemiologic factors (BWHS model). Data from the Black Women’s Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of 59,000 US Black women followed by biennial questionnaire since 1995, were used to calculate AUCs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for discriminatory accuracy of the BWHS model, the AA-PRS alone, and a new model that combined them. Analyses were based on data from 922 women with invasive breast cancer and 1844 age-matched controls. AUCs were 0.577 (95% CI 0.556–0.598) for the BWHS model and 0.584 (95% CI 0.563–0.605) for the AA-PRS. For a model that combined estimates from the questionnaire-based BWHS model with the PRS, the AUC increased to 0.623 (95% CI 0.603–0.644). This combined model represents a step forward for personalized breast cancer preventive care for US Black women, as its performance metrics are similar to those from models in other populations. Use of this new model may mitigate exacerbation of breast cancer disparities if and when it becomes feasible to include a PRS in routine health care decision-making.","PeriodicalId":9222,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01748-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous work in European ancestry populations has shown that adding a polygenic risk score (PRS) to breast cancer risk prediction models based on epidemiologic factors results in better discriminatory performance as measured by the AUC (area under the curve). Following publication of the first PRS to perform well in women of African ancestry (AA-PRS), we conducted an external validation of the AA-PRS and then evaluated the addition of the AA-PRS to a risk calculator for incident breast cancer in Black women based on epidemiologic factors (BWHS model). Data from the Black Women’s Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of 59,000 US Black women followed by biennial questionnaire since 1995, were used to calculate AUCs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for discriminatory accuracy of the BWHS model, the AA-PRS alone, and a new model that combined them. Analyses were based on data from 922 women with invasive breast cancer and 1844 age-matched controls. AUCs were 0.577 (95% CI 0.556–0.598) for the BWHS model and 0.584 (95% CI 0.563–0.605) for the AA-PRS. For a model that combined estimates from the questionnaire-based BWHS model with the PRS, the AUC increased to 0.623 (95% CI 0.603–0.644). This combined model represents a step forward for personalized breast cancer preventive care for US Black women, as its performance metrics are similar to those from models in other populations. Use of this new model may mitigate exacerbation of breast cancer disparities if and when it becomes feasible to include a PRS in routine health care decision-making.
在美国黑人妇女乳腺癌预测风险计算器中加入多基因风险评分
以前在欧洲血统人群中开展的研究表明,在基于流行病学因素的乳腺癌风险预测模型中添加多基因风险评分(PRS),可以提高以 AUC(曲线下面积)衡量的判别性能。继首个在非洲裔女性中表现良好的遗传风险评分(AA-PRS)公布后,我们对 AA-PRS 进行了外部验证,然后评估了将 AA-PRS 添加到基于流行病学因素的黑人女性乳腺癌发病风险计算器(BWHS 模型)中的效果。黑人妇女健康研究(Black Women's Health Study)是一项前瞻性队列研究,自 1995 年以来对 59,000 名美国黑人妇女进行了两年一次的问卷调查,该研究的数据被用来计算 BWHS 模型、单独的 AA-PRS 以及将它们结合起来的新模型的判别准确性的 AUC 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。分析基于 922 名患浸润性乳腺癌的妇女和 1844 名年龄匹配的对照组的数据。BWHS模型的AUC为0.577(95% CI 0.556-0.598),AA-PRS的AUC为0.584(95% CI 0.563-0.605)。对于将基于问卷的 BWHS 模型和 PRS 的估计值相结合的模型,AUC 增加到 0.623 (95% CI 0.603-0.644)。这一综合模型代表着美国黑人妇女在个性化乳腺癌预防保健方面向前迈进了一步,因为它的性能指标与其他人群模型的性能指标相似。如果将 PRS 纳入常规医疗决策变得可行,那么使用这种新模型可能会缓解乳腺癌差异的加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research is an international, peer-reviewed online journal, publishing original research, reviews, editorials and reports. Open access research articles of exceptional interest are published in all areas of biology and medicine relevant to breast cancer, including normal mammary gland biology, with special emphasis on the genetic, biochemical, and cellular basis of breast cancer. In addition to basic research, the journal publishes preclinical, translational and clinical studies with a biological basis, including Phase I and Phase II trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信