Effect of Mortality alongside 5-Year Survival Rates and Incidence on the Public's Perceived Benefits of Cancer Screening and Screening Intention: A Web-Based Experimental Study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1177/0272989X231218278
Soyun Kim
{"title":"Effect of Mortality alongside 5-Year Survival Rates and Incidence on the Public's Perceived Benefits of Cancer Screening and Screening Intention: A Web-Based Experimental Study.","authors":"Soyun Kim","doi":"10.1177/0272989X231218278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mortality is critical information in evaluating the benefits of cancer screening. However, 5-y survival rates and incidence, without mortality, have been frequently communicated to the public. Based on the literature that people's perceptions and judgments can be altered by the way of presenting health statistics, the current study examined whether mortality alongside 5-y survival and incidence would influence laypeople's perceptions of the effectiveness of cancer screening and screening intention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In an online-based experimental survey conducted in South Korea in October 2022, 300 adults were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups (mortality: no v. yes) to be presented with 3 different cancers (A, B, and C). The perceived effectiveness of cancer screening and screening intention were measured using 7-point scales for each cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all cancers, participants in the no-mortality group perceived cancer screening to be more effective and were more willing to undergo screening compared with those in the mortality group, although the results were not statistically significant on the intention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In general, mortality had an effect of decreasing the perceived effectiveness of cancer screening and screening intention compared with no mortality, although the effect on the intention was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>When communicating the benefits of cancer screening to the public, mortality statistics may play a role in mitigating the potentially inflated perception of the benefits of cancer screening and screening intention.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Five-year survival rates, either alone or with incidence rates, are frequently communicated to the public in the context of the benefits of cancer screening.However, 5-y survival rates can sometimes be inflated without a reduction in mortality.Including mortality statistics in communications decreased the perceived effectiveness of cancer screening and screening intentions.Mortality information needs to be communicated in the benefits of cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231218278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mortality is critical information in evaluating the benefits of cancer screening. However, 5-y survival rates and incidence, without mortality, have been frequently communicated to the public. Based on the literature that people's perceptions and judgments can be altered by the way of presenting health statistics, the current study examined whether mortality alongside 5-y survival and incidence would influence laypeople's perceptions of the effectiveness of cancer screening and screening intention.

Methods: In an online-based experimental survey conducted in South Korea in October 2022, 300 adults were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups (mortality: no v. yes) to be presented with 3 different cancers (A, B, and C). The perceived effectiveness of cancer screening and screening intention were measured using 7-point scales for each cancer.

Results: Across all cancers, participants in the no-mortality group perceived cancer screening to be more effective and were more willing to undergo screening compared with those in the mortality group, although the results were not statistically significant on the intention.

Conclusions: In general, mortality had an effect of decreasing the perceived effectiveness of cancer screening and screening intention compared with no mortality, although the effect on the intention was not statistically significant.

Implications: When communicating the benefits of cancer screening to the public, mortality statistics may play a role in mitigating the potentially inflated perception of the benefits of cancer screening and screening intention.

Highlights: Five-year survival rates, either alone or with incidence rates, are frequently communicated to the public in the context of the benefits of cancer screening.However, 5-y survival rates can sometimes be inflated without a reduction in mortality.Including mortality statistics in communications decreased the perceived effectiveness of cancer screening and screening intentions.Mortality information needs to be communicated in the benefits of cancer screening.

死亡率、5 年生存率和发病率对公众感知癌症筛查益处和筛查意向的影响:基于网络的实验研究》。
背景:死亡率是评估癌症筛查益处的关键信息。然而,人们经常向公众传达的是 5 年生存率和发病率,而不包括死亡率。有文献指出,健康统计数据的呈现方式会改变人们的感知和判断,基于此,本研究探讨了死亡率与 5 年生存率和发病率是否会影响普通人对癌症筛查有效性的感知和筛查意向:方法:2022 年 10 月,在韩国进行了一项基于网络的实验调查,300 名成年人被随机分配到 2 组(死亡率:否与是)中的 1 组,向他们介绍 3 种不同的癌症(A、B 和 C)。针对每种癌症,采用 7 分制量表测量癌症筛查的感知效果和筛查意向:在所有癌症中,与死亡率组的参与者相比,无死亡率组的参与者认为癌症筛查更有效,也更愿意接受筛查,但在筛查意向方面,结果没有统计学意义:总的来说,与无死亡率组相比,有死亡率组会降低癌症筛查的有效性感知和筛查意愿,但对筛查意愿的影响在统计学上并不显著:启示:在向公众宣传癌症筛查的益处时,死亡率统计数据可能会起到一定的作用,减轻人们对癌症筛查益处和筛查意向的潜在夸大认知:重点:在向公众宣传癌症筛查的益处时,五年生存率(无论是单独还是与发病率一起)经常被提及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信