Safety and efficacy of telitacicept in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus patients who failed treatment with belimumab : A case series.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1007/s00393-023-01461-z
Qiuyu Fan, Huiqin Yang, Ya Liu
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of telitacicept in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus patients who failed treatment with belimumab : A case series.","authors":"Qiuyu Fan, Huiqin Yang, Ya Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00393-023-01461-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine the effect and safety of telitacicept, an antagonist of BLyS/APRIL-mediated B cell activation, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who failed treatment with belimumab and in whom telitacicept was administered combined with conventional therapy. A review of published reports on telitacicept for SLE was also performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed of the records of patients seen in the Department of Rheumatology at the Wuhan Hospital of Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, China, with refractory SLE who had failed treatment with belimumab. The terms \"systemic lupus erythematosus\" and \"telitacicept\" were used to identify patients reported in the English medical literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Identified were 14 refractory SLE patients, 3 males (21%) and 11 females (79%). The median age was 32.9 years. The median disease duration was 8.9 years. Patients in this cohort received telitacicept for an average of 34.1 weeks (17-62 weeks) and the total SLE responder index 4 (SRI-4) response rate was 78.9% (n = 11). The mean SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score declined from 8.6 at baseline (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.87-9.28) to 4.29 at the endpoint (95% CI 3.4-5.16). All cases (100%) had hypocomplementemia at baseline, and 7 cases (50%) reported normal C3 and C4 levels at the follow-up endpoint. At the observation endpoint, the 24‑h urinary protein value of the 13 cases with proteinuria (baseline 24‑h urinary protein > 0.5 g/d) displayed a reduction, and 3 values turned negative. Although some patients had low serum total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels, subnormal IgG levels, and absolute counts of peripheral blood lymphocytes after treatment, no serious infection was reported. One case was refractory lupus hepatitis confirmed by liver pathology, and upon change to change to telitacicept treatment, liver function returned to normal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first case series in SLE patients who accepted telitacicept treatment after failed treatment with belimumab. Our case series and review of the literature show that telitacicept combined with the original standard treatment may significantly improve disease activity while reducing prednisone use. No major safety issues were seen in this group of patients. Telitacicept may be a promising drug for the treatment of refractory lupus hepatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23834,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-023-01461-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect and safety of telitacicept, an antagonist of BLyS/APRIL-mediated B cell activation, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who failed treatment with belimumab and in whom telitacicept was administered combined with conventional therapy. A review of published reports on telitacicept for SLE was also performed.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the records of patients seen in the Department of Rheumatology at the Wuhan Hospital of Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, China, with refractory SLE who had failed treatment with belimumab. The terms "systemic lupus erythematosus" and "telitacicept" were used to identify patients reported in the English medical literature.

Results: Identified were 14 refractory SLE patients, 3 males (21%) and 11 females (79%). The median age was 32.9 years. The median disease duration was 8.9 years. Patients in this cohort received telitacicept for an average of 34.1 weeks (17-62 weeks) and the total SLE responder index 4 (SRI-4) response rate was 78.9% (n = 11). The mean SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score declined from 8.6 at baseline (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.87-9.28) to 4.29 at the endpoint (95% CI 3.4-5.16). All cases (100%) had hypocomplementemia at baseline, and 7 cases (50%) reported normal C3 and C4 levels at the follow-up endpoint. At the observation endpoint, the 24‑h urinary protein value of the 13 cases with proteinuria (baseline 24‑h urinary protein > 0.5 g/d) displayed a reduction, and 3 values turned negative. Although some patients had low serum total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels, subnormal IgG levels, and absolute counts of peripheral blood lymphocytes after treatment, no serious infection was reported. One case was refractory lupus hepatitis confirmed by liver pathology, and upon change to change to telitacicept treatment, liver function returned to normal.

Conclusion: This is the first case series in SLE patients who accepted telitacicept treatment after failed treatment with belimumab. Our case series and review of the literature show that telitacicept combined with the original standard treatment may significantly improve disease activity while reducing prednisone use. No major safety issues were seen in this group of patients. Telitacicept may be a promising drug for the treatment of refractory lupus hepatitis.

贝利木单抗治疗失败的难治性系统性红斑狼疮患者使用替立替塞普的安全性和疗效:病例系列。
研究目的本研究旨在确定泰利替塞(一种BLyS/APRIL介导的B细胞活化拮抗剂)对贝利姆单抗治疗失败的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的效果和安全性,泰利替塞与传统疗法联合使用。此外,还对已发表的有关替立替塞治疗系统性红斑狼疮的报告进行了回顾:方法:我们对中国武汉市中西医结合医院风湿免疫科接诊的贝利木单抗治疗失败的难治性系统性红斑狼疮患者的病历进行了回顾性研究。我们使用 "系统性红斑狼疮 "和 "替立替塞 "这两个词来识别英文医学文献中报道的患者:共发现14名难治性系统性红斑狼疮患者,其中男性3名(21%),女性11名(79%)。中位年龄为 32.9 岁。中位病程为 8.9 年。患者接受替立替塞普治疗的平均时间为34.1周(17-62周),系统性红斑狼疮反应指数4(SRI-4)总反应率为78.9%(n = 11)。系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)的平均值从基线时的 8.6(95% 置信区间 [CI] 7.87-9.28)下降到终点时的 4.29(95% 置信区间 3.4-5.16)。所有病例(100%)在基线时都有低补体血症,7 例(50%)在随访终点时报告 C3 和 C4 水平正常。在观察终点,13 例蛋白尿患者(基线 24 小时尿蛋白 > 0.5 克/天)的 24 小时尿蛋白值有所下降,3 例转为阴性。虽然一些患者在治疗后出现血清总免疫球蛋白(Ig)水平低、IgG 水平不正常和外周血淋巴细胞绝对计数低的情况,但没有严重感染的报告。其中一例经肝脏病理证实为难治性狼疮性肝炎,改用替立替塞治疗后,肝功能恢复正常:这是首个系统性红斑狼疮患者在接受贝利木单抗治疗失败后接受替利他赛治疗的系列病例。我们的系列病例和文献综述显示,替立替塞普与原来的标准治疗相结合,可以显著改善疾病活动,同时减少泼尼松的用量。在这组患者中没有发现重大的安全性问题。泰利肝素可能是治疗难治性狼疮肝炎的一种有前途的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie ist ein international angesehenes Publikationsorgan und dient der Fortbildung von niedergelassenen und in der Klinik tätigen Rheumatologen. Die Zeitschrift widmet sich allen Aspekten der klinischen Rheumatologie, der Therapie rheumatischer Erkrankungen sowie der rheumatologischen Grundlagenforschung. Umfassende Übersichtsarbeiten zu einem aktuellen Schwerpunktthema sind das Kernstück jeder Ausgabe. Im Mittelpunkt steht dabei gesichertes Wissen zu Diagnostik und Therapie mit hoher Relevanz für die tägliche Arbeit – der Leser erhält konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen. Frei eingereichte Originalien ermöglichen die Präsentation wichtiger klinischer Studien und dienen dem wissenschaftlichen Austausch.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信