Laboratory comparison of vegetation and gravel on parameters affecting urban floods under different rainfall and runoff conditions

Hamidreza Ghazvinian, Hojat Karami
{"title":"Laboratory comparison of vegetation and gravel on parameters affecting urban floods under different rainfall and runoff conditions","authors":"Hamidreza Ghazvinian, Hojat Karami","doi":"10.2166/wcc.2023.424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div data- reveal-group-><div><img alt=\"graphic\" data-src=\"https://iwa.silverchair-cdn.com/iwa/content_public/journal/jwcc/14/12/10.2166_wcc.2023.424/1/m_jwc-d-23-00424gf01.png?Expires=1706939366&amp;Signature=EEepxGlkWJXKzJcw5~PsIVQLpSiDqCDk-tU-DexRdWUwDY~cVtrpbEj8v8Yu34ZgwtO6G2YBrRHzhMyBlLpM8AGrRh8f~sLlgk5uuyKFeF15PTMxus8fIDC4plcsyZ7dB-iLeu81jrO1WCPjJu9Q2I9fPMV2Qt2~7XsCSAQzNHizknVke9KWlFrbM-T3sbMpQ-JyW1y6U5TvBbIGpvOFVQ7iq9R3bT-uqWKQi0hqeJArpd8745UlrCGM1a9o2sPFPVHk1F1PGjBh1Vnre7l4aXoXeVIGN-zYhhJ4a4~YRr2uWPxfQ766rNkYt3EO-5exEbfg9m9aujoS-FEYcKYksw__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\" path-from-xml=\"jwc-d-23-00424gf01.tif\" src=\"https://iwa.silverchair-cdn.com/iwa/content_public/journal/jwcc/14/12/10.2166_wcc.2023.424/1/m_jwc-d-23-00424gf01.png?Expires=1706939366&amp;Signature=EEepxGlkWJXKzJcw5~PsIVQLpSiDqCDk-tU-DexRdWUwDY~cVtrpbEj8v8Yu34ZgwtO6G2YBrRHzhMyBlLpM8AGrRh8f~sLlgk5uuyKFeF15PTMxus8fIDC4plcsyZ7dB-iLeu81jrO1WCPjJu9Q2I9fPMV2Qt2~7XsCSAQzNHizknVke9KWlFrbM-T3sbMpQ-JyW1y6U5TvBbIGpvOFVQ7iq9R3bT-uqWKQi0hqeJArpd8745UlrCGM1a9o2sPFPVHk1F1PGjBh1Vnre7l4aXoXeVIGN-zYhhJ4a4~YRr2uWPxfQ766rNkYt3EO-5exEbfg9m9aujoS-FEYcKYksw__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\"/><div>View largeDownload slide</div></div></div><div content- data-reveal=\"data-reveal\"><div><img alt=\"graphic\" data-src=\"https://iwa.silverchair-cdn.com/iwa/content_public/journal/jwcc/14/12/10.2166_wcc.2023.424/1/m_jwc-d-23-00424gf01.png?Expires=1706939366&amp;Signature=EEepxGlkWJXKzJcw5~PsIVQLpSiDqCDk-tU-DexRdWUwDY~cVtrpbEj8v8Yu34ZgwtO6G2YBrRHzhMyBlLpM8AGrRh8f~sLlgk5uuyKFeF15PTMxus8fIDC4plcsyZ7dB-iLeu81jrO1WCPjJu9Q2I9fPMV2Qt2~7XsCSAQzNHizknVke9KWlFrbM-T3sbMpQ-JyW1y6U5TvBbIGpvOFVQ7iq9R3bT-uqWKQi0hqeJArpd8745UlrCGM1a9o2sPFPVHk1F1PGjBh1Vnre7l4aXoXeVIGN-zYhhJ4a4~YRr2uWPxfQ766rNkYt3EO-5exEbfg9m9aujoS-FEYcKYksw__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\" path-from-xml=\"jwc-d-23-00424gf01.tif\" src=\"https://iwa.silverchair-cdn.com/iwa/content_public/journal/jwcc/14/12/10.2166_wcc.2023.424/1/m_jwc-d-23-00424gf01.png?Expires=1706939366&amp;Signature=EEepxGlkWJXKzJcw5~PsIVQLpSiDqCDk-tU-DexRdWUwDY~cVtrpbEj8v8Yu34ZgwtO6G2YBrRHzhMyBlLpM8AGrRh8f~sLlgk5uuyKFeF15PTMxus8fIDC4plcsyZ7dB-iLeu81jrO1WCPjJu9Q2I9fPMV2Qt2~7XsCSAQzNHizknVke9KWlFrbM-T3sbMpQ-JyW1y6U5TvBbIGpvOFVQ7iq9R3bT-uqWKQi0hqeJArpd8745UlrCGM1a9o2sPFPVHk1F1PGjBh1Vnre7l4aXoXeVIGN-zYhhJ4a4~YRr2uWPxfQ766rNkYt3EO-5exEbfg9m9aujoS-FEYcKYksw__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA\"/><div>View largeDownload slide</div></div><i> </i><span>Close modal</span></div></div><p>This research seeks to analyze and compare the performance of impervious surface as control (O), sandy loam substrate, gravel, gravel with geocell layer (GGE), rosemary (R), rosemary with geocell layer (RGE), turf (T), and turf with geocell layer (TGE) in the reduction of rainfall-runoff volume, time to start runoff (TSR), runoff coefficient (C), time to end runoff (TER), peak flow (PF) rate, time to peak (TP), and time base (TB) under three conditions of rainfall, horizontal runoff, and the combination of rainfall and runoff in a slope of 5% using a rainfall simulator. Regarding the factorial results of the effective parameters of the test mode and the test sample on TSR, TER, TP, TB, C, and PF, there was a significant difference at the 5% level between the data in all cases. In all cases, GGE treatment performed better compared to the rest of the test groups in reducing runoff and cumulative volume. On the other hand, treatments O and GGE experienced the highest and lowest flow rate, respectively. For a given test condition, the value of C is the lowest for the GGE treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":510893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water & Climate Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water & Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Image
View largeDownload slide
Abstract Image
View largeDownload slide
Close modal

This research seeks to analyze and compare the performance of impervious surface as control (O), sandy loam substrate, gravel, gravel with geocell layer (GGE), rosemary (R), rosemary with geocell layer (RGE), turf (T), and turf with geocell layer (TGE) in the reduction of rainfall-runoff volume, time to start runoff (TSR), runoff coefficient (C), time to end runoff (TER), peak flow (PF) rate, time to peak (TP), and time base (TB) under three conditions of rainfall, horizontal runoff, and the combination of rainfall and runoff in a slope of 5% using a rainfall simulator. Regarding the factorial results of the effective parameters of the test mode and the test sample on TSR, TER, TP, TB, C, and PF, there was a significant difference at the 5% level between the data in all cases. In all cases, GGE treatment performed better compared to the rest of the test groups in reducing runoff and cumulative volume. On the other hand, treatments O and GGE experienced the highest and lowest flow rate, respectively. For a given test condition, the value of C is the lowest for the GGE treatment.

不同降雨和径流条件下植被和砾石对城市洪水影响参数的实验室比较
查看 largeDownload 幻灯片查看 largeDownload 幻灯片 关闭模态本研究旨在分析和比较作为对照(O)的不透水表面、砂壤土基质、砾石、带土工格室层的砾石(GGE)、迷迭香(R)、带土工格室层的迷迭香(RGE)、草皮(T)和带土工格室层的草皮(TGE)在减少降雨径流量方面的性能、在降雨、水平径流以及坡度为 5%的降雨和径流组合三种条件下,使用降雨模拟器计算的径流开始时间 (TSR)、径流系数 (C)、径流结束时间 (TER)、峰值流量 (PF)、峰值时间 (TP) 和时基 (TB)。关于试验模式和试验样本的有效参数对 TSR、TER、TP、TB、C 和 PF 的影响的因子结果,所有情况下的数据在 5%的水平上都存在显著差异。在所有情况下,与其他试验组相比,GGE 处理在减少径流量和累积体积方面表现更好。另一方面,O 和 GGE 处理的流量分别最高和最低。在特定测试条件下,GGE 处理的 C 值最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信