Strengthening Cooperative Consensus in Multi-Robot Confrontation

IF 7.2 4区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Meng Xu, Xinhong Chen, Yechao She, Yang Jin, Guanyi Zhao, Jianping Wang
{"title":"Strengthening Cooperative Consensus in Multi-Robot Confrontation","authors":"Meng Xu, Xinhong Chen, Yechao She, Yang Jin, Guanyi Zhao, Jianping Wang","doi":"10.1145/3639371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has proven effective in training multi-robot confrontation, such as StarCraft and robot soccer games. However, the current joint action policies utilized in MARL have been unsuccessful in recognizing and preventing actions that often lead to failures on our side. This exacerbates the cooperation dilemma, ultimately resulting in our agents acting independently and being defeated individually by their opponents. To tackle this challenge, we propose a novel joint action policy, referred to as the consensus action policy (CAP). Specifically, CAP records the number of times each joint action has caused our side to fail in the past and computes a cooperation tendency, which is integrated with each agent’s Q-value and Nash bargaining solution to determine a joint action. The cooperation tendency promotes team cooperation by selecting joint actions that have a high tendency of cooperation and avoiding actions that may lead to team failure. Moreover, the proposed CAP policy can be extended to partially observable scenarios by combining it with Deep Q network (DQN) or actor-critic-based methods. We conducted extensive experiments to compare the proposed method with seven existing joint action policies, including four commonly used methods and three state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, in terms of episode rewards, winning rates, and other metrics. Our results demonstrate that this approach holds great promise for multi-robot confrontation scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":48967,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3639371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has proven effective in training multi-robot confrontation, such as StarCraft and robot soccer games. However, the current joint action policies utilized in MARL have been unsuccessful in recognizing and preventing actions that often lead to failures on our side. This exacerbates the cooperation dilemma, ultimately resulting in our agents acting independently and being defeated individually by their opponents. To tackle this challenge, we propose a novel joint action policy, referred to as the consensus action policy (CAP). Specifically, CAP records the number of times each joint action has caused our side to fail in the past and computes a cooperation tendency, which is integrated with each agent’s Q-value and Nash bargaining solution to determine a joint action. The cooperation tendency promotes team cooperation by selecting joint actions that have a high tendency of cooperation and avoiding actions that may lead to team failure. Moreover, the proposed CAP policy can be extended to partially observable scenarios by combining it with Deep Q network (DQN) or actor-critic-based methods. We conducted extensive experiments to compare the proposed method with seven existing joint action policies, including four commonly used methods and three state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, in terms of episode rewards, winning rates, and other metrics. Our results demonstrate that this approach holds great promise for multi-robot confrontation scenarios.

在多机器人对抗中加强合作共识
事实证明,多代理强化学习(MARL)在训练多机器人对抗(如《星际争霸》和机器人足球比赛)方面非常有效。然而,目前 MARL 中使用的联合行动策略无法成功识别和防止经常导致我方失败的行动。这加剧了合作困境,最终导致我们的代理各自为政,被对手击败。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了一种新颖的联合行动策略,即共识行动策略(CAP)。具体来说,CAP 记录了每个联合行动在过去导致我方失败的次数,并计算出合作倾向,将其与每个代理的 Q 值和纳什讨价还价方案相结合,确定联合行动。合作倾向通过选择合作倾向高的联合行动,避免可能导致团队失败的行动,从而促进团队合作。此外,通过与深度 Q 网络(DQN)或基于行动者批判的方法相结合,所提出的 CAP 策略还可以扩展到部分可观测场景。我们进行了广泛的实验,将所提出的方法与现有的七种联合行动策略(包括四种常用方法和三种最先进的(SOTA)方法)在情节奖励、胜率和其他指标方面进行了比较。我们的结果表明,这种方法在多机器人对抗场景中大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology is a scholarly journal that publishes the highest quality papers on intelligent systems, applicable algorithms and technology with a multi-disciplinary perspective. An intelligent system is one that uses artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to offer important services (e.g., as a component of a larger system) to allow integrated systems to perceive, reason, learn, and act intelligently in the real world. ACM TIST is published quarterly (six issues a year). Each issue has 8-11 regular papers, with around 20 published journal pages or 10,000 words per paper. Additional references, proofs, graphs or detailed experiment results can be submitted as a separate appendix, while excessively lengthy papers will be rejected automatically. Authors can include online-only appendices for additional content of their published papers and are encouraged to share their code and/or data with other readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信