Revolutionizing Healthcare in the COVID-19 Era: Physicians Are Successfully Embracing Social Media to Replace Traditional Face-to-face Contact

Amr Alnagar, Yasir Ahmed Mohammed Elhadi, Rowan Abuyadek, Muhammad Quoritem, Rodaina Osama Abdel Majid, Sara Attia Ghitani, Asma Omar, Manar Arafat, Mohammed S. Foula, Ramy Shaaban
{"title":"Revolutionizing Healthcare in the COVID-19 Era: Physicians Are Successfully Embracing Social Media to Replace Traditional Face-to-face Contact","authors":"Amr Alnagar, Yasir Ahmed Mohammed Elhadi, Rowan Abuyadek, Muhammad Quoritem, Rodaina Osama Abdel Majid, Sara Attia Ghitani, Asma Omar, Manar Arafat, Mohammed S. Foula, Ramy Shaaban","doi":"10.1007/s42399-023-01632-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has restricted face-to-face communication. Social media groups have emerged as a tool for knowledge sharing and problem-solving. However, the unfiltered information exchange can present a dilemma. This study examines the role of a private Facebook group managed by physicians from the same class in the Alexandria Faculty of Medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. It employs a mixed-methods approach, combining content analysis of group posts and responses with an electronic survey of group members. The content analysis of 185 posts reveals that the majority (89.2%) were problem-related, with logistic help requests and clinical questions being the most common types representing 41% and 37%, respectively. Vaccine-related inquiries (11%) and posts seeking specialist responses to laboratory or radiological investigations (11%) were also present. The analysis further demonstrates that 89.7% of problem-related posts received specific replies, addressing the raised requirements, indicating an engaged and supportive community. Moreover, 0.6% of posts received psychological support or wishes for rapid recovery. Of the problem-related posts, 84.2% were successfully solved, contributing to preliminary diagnosis, referral, prescription, or logistical assistance. The electronic survey measuring member satisfaction shows that the majority (76.4%) of participants reported being satisfied with the group’s services, with high satisfaction rates regarding reply speed, quality of replies, problem resolution, and meeting expectations. Physician social media groups facilitated knowledge exchange, problem-solving, and peer support during the COVID-19 pandemic in Egypt. Future research can explore the long-term impact of these groups on clinical outcomes and physician well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":21944,"journal":{"name":"SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-023-01632-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has restricted face-to-face communication. Social media groups have emerged as a tool for knowledge sharing and problem-solving. However, the unfiltered information exchange can present a dilemma. This study examines the role of a private Facebook group managed by physicians from the same class in the Alexandria Faculty of Medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. It employs a mixed-methods approach, combining content analysis of group posts and responses with an electronic survey of group members. The content analysis of 185 posts reveals that the majority (89.2%) were problem-related, with logistic help requests and clinical questions being the most common types representing 41% and 37%, respectively. Vaccine-related inquiries (11%) and posts seeking specialist responses to laboratory or radiological investigations (11%) were also present. The analysis further demonstrates that 89.7% of problem-related posts received specific replies, addressing the raised requirements, indicating an engaged and supportive community. Moreover, 0.6% of posts received psychological support or wishes for rapid recovery. Of the problem-related posts, 84.2% were successfully solved, contributing to preliminary diagnosis, referral, prescription, or logistical assistance. The electronic survey measuring member satisfaction shows that the majority (76.4%) of participants reported being satisfied with the group’s services, with high satisfaction rates regarding reply speed, quality of replies, problem resolution, and meeting expectations. Physician social media groups facilitated knowledge exchange, problem-solving, and peer support during the COVID-19 pandemic in Egypt. Future research can explore the long-term impact of these groups on clinical outcomes and physician well-being.

Abstract Image

COVID-19 时代的医疗变革:医生成功拥抱社交媒体以取代传统的面对面接触
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行限制了面对面的交流。社交媒体群组已成为知识共享和解决问题的工具。然而,未经过滤的信息交流可能会带来困境。本研究探讨了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,由亚历山大医学院同班医生管理的私人 Facebook 群组所发挥的作用。研究采用了一种混合方法,将对群组帖子和回复的内容分析与对群组成员的电子调查相结合。对 185 个帖子的内容分析显示,大多数帖子(89.2%)与问题有关,其中最常见的是后勤帮助请求和临床问题,分别占 41% 和 37%。此外,还有与疫苗相关的询问(11%)和寻求专家对实验室或放射检查做出答复的帖子(11%)。分析进一步表明,89.7% 与问题相关的帖子得到了具体回复,解决了提出的要求,这表明社区参与度高,支持力度大。此外,0.6% 的帖子得到了心理支持或祝愿其早日康复。在与问题相关的帖子中,84.2% 的帖子得到了成功解决,促成了初步诊断、转诊、处方或后勤援助。衡量成员满意度的电子调查显示,大多数参与者(76.4%)对群组的服务表示满意,在回复速度、回复质量、问题解决和满足期望方面的满意度都很高。在埃及 COVID-19 大流行期间,医生社交媒体小组促进了知识交流、问题解决和同伴支持。未来的研究可以探索这些群组对临床结果和医生福祉的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信