Age Is Superior to Aortopathy Phenotype as a Predictor of Aortic Mechanics in Patients with Bicuspid Valve

Matthew A. Thompson, Benjamin Kramer, Samar A. Tarraf, Emily Vianna, Callan Gillespie, Emidio Germano, Brett Gentle, Frank Cikach, Ashley M. Lowry, Amol Pande, Eugene Blackstone, Jennifer Hargrave, Robb Colbrunn, Chiara Bellini, Eric E. Roselli
{"title":"Age Is Superior to Aortopathy Phenotype as a Predictor of Aortic Mechanics in Patients with Bicuspid Valve","authors":"Matthew A. Thompson, Benjamin Kramer, Samar A. Tarraf, Emily Vianna, Callan Gillespie, Emidio Germano, Brett Gentle, Frank Cikach, Ashley M. Lowry, Amol Pande, Eugene Blackstone, Jennifer Hargrave, Robb Colbrunn, Chiara Bellini, Eric E. Roselli","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.12.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Objectives</h3><p>Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy is defined by three phenotypes—root, ascending, and diffuse—based on region of maximal aortic dilation. We sought to determine the association between aortic mechanical behavior and aortopathy phenotype versus other clinical variables.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>From 08/01/2016 to 03/01/2022, 375 aortic specimens were collected from 105 patients undergoing elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair for BAV aortopathy. Planar biaxial data (191 specimens) informed constitutive descriptors of the arterial wall that were combined with <em>in vivo</em> geometry and hemodynamics to predict stiffness, stress, and energy density under physiologic loads. Uniaxial testing (184 specimens) evaluated failure stretch and failure Cauchy stress. Boosting regression was implemented to model the association between clinical variables and mechanical metrics.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences in mechanical metrics between the root phenotype (N=33, 31%) and ascending/diffuse phenotypes (N=72, 69%). Biaxial testing demonstrated older age was associated with increased circumferential stiffness, decreased stress, and decreased energy density. On uniaxial testing, longitudinally versus circumferentially oriented specimens failed at significantly lower Cauchy stress (50th [15th, 85th percentiles]: 1.0 [0.7, 1.6] MPa vs. 1.9 [1.3, 3.1] MPa; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). Age was associated with decreased failure stretch and stress. Elongated ascending aortas were also associated with decreased failure stress.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Aortic mechanical function under physiologic and failure conditions in BAV aortopathy is robustly associated with age and poorly associated with aortopathy phenotype. Data suggesting that the root phenotype of BAV aortopathy portends worse outcomes are unlikely to be related to aberrant, phenotype-specific tissue mechanics.</p>","PeriodicalId":501609,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.12.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy is defined by three phenotypes—root, ascending, and diffuse—based on region of maximal aortic dilation. We sought to determine the association between aortic mechanical behavior and aortopathy phenotype versus other clinical variables.

Methods

From 08/01/2016 to 03/01/2022, 375 aortic specimens were collected from 105 patients undergoing elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair for BAV aortopathy. Planar biaxial data (191 specimens) informed constitutive descriptors of the arterial wall that were combined with in vivo geometry and hemodynamics to predict stiffness, stress, and energy density under physiologic loads. Uniaxial testing (184 specimens) evaluated failure stretch and failure Cauchy stress. Boosting regression was implemented to model the association between clinical variables and mechanical metrics.

Results

There were no significant differences in mechanical metrics between the root phenotype (N=33, 31%) and ascending/diffuse phenotypes (N=72, 69%). Biaxial testing demonstrated older age was associated with increased circumferential stiffness, decreased stress, and decreased energy density. On uniaxial testing, longitudinally versus circumferentially oriented specimens failed at significantly lower Cauchy stress (50th [15th, 85th percentiles]: 1.0 [0.7, 1.6] MPa vs. 1.9 [1.3, 3.1] MPa; P<0.001). Age was associated with decreased failure stretch and stress. Elongated ascending aortas were also associated with decreased failure stress.

Conclusions

Aortic mechanical function under physiologic and failure conditions in BAV aortopathy is robustly associated with age and poorly associated with aortopathy phenotype. Data suggesting that the root phenotype of BAV aortopathy portends worse outcomes are unlikely to be related to aberrant, phenotype-specific tissue mechanics.

Abstract Image

年龄比大动脉病变表型更能预测双腔瓣患者的主动脉力学状况
目的根据主动脉最大扩张区域,将主动脉瓣二尖瓣(BAV)主动脉病变定义为三种表型--根型、升型和弥漫型。我们试图确定主动脉机械性能和主动脉病变表型与其他临床变量之间的关联。方法从 2016 年 1 月 8 日至 2022 年 1 月 3 日,我们从 105 名因 BAV 主动脉病变而接受择期升主动脉瘤修复术的患者身上收集了 375 份主动脉标本。平面双轴数据(191 个标本)提供了动脉壁的构成描述,这些描述与活体几何和血流动力学相结合,可预测生理负荷下的刚度、应力和能量密度。单轴测试(184 个样本)评估了失效拉伸和失效考氏应力。结果根表型(样本数=33,31%)和上升/弥漫表型(样本数=72,69%)的机械指标无明显差异。双轴测试表明,年龄越大,周向刚度越大,应力越小,能量密度越小。在单轴测试中,纵向与周向试样在明显较低的考氏应力(第 50 个百分位数[第 15 个百分位数,第 85 个百分位数]:1.0 [0.7, 1.6] MPa vs. 1.9 [1.3, 3.1] MPa; P<0.001)。年龄与失效拉伸和应力的降低有关。结论BAV主动脉病变在生理和衰竭条件下的主动脉机械功能与年龄密切相关,而与主动脉病变表型关系不大。有数据表明,BAV 主动脉病变的根部表型预示着较差的预后,这不太可能与表型特异的异常组织力学有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信