{"title":"Valuation asymmetry in the dynamic private provision of public goods","authors":"Subhra K. Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1007/s40505-023-00260-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I consider a dynamic game of private provision of a <i>discrete public good</i> by individuals who derive <i>asymmetric flow benefits</i> every period upon project completion. The individuals are otherwise homogeneous. I show that an asymmetric Markov perfect equilibrium (MPE) exists, which is either <i>a completion equilibrium</i> (where the good is provided) or <i>a no-contribution equilibrium</i> depending on the benefits asymmetry. A completion equilibrium <i>does not</i> require all the agents to contribute at every period. Along an MPE, an individual contributes from the beginning (<span>\\(t=0\\)</span>), irrespective of others’ contributions, if her flow benefit exceeds <i>a contribution threshold</i>. Individual contributions are <i>strategic complements</i> across time; however, the coefficient of strategic complementarity is independent of valuation asymmetry. A higher valuation individual makes a larger <i>absolute</i> contribution every period. I show that all the socially beneficial projects get completed in an asymmetric MPE when the higher valuation individual’s flow benefit exceeds that <i>contribution threshold</i> and that an asymmetric completion MPE is efficiency improving compared to its symmetric counterpart.</p>","PeriodicalId":40852,"journal":{"name":"Economic Theory Bulletin","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Theory Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-023-00260-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
I consider a dynamic game of private provision of a discrete public good by individuals who derive asymmetric flow benefits every period upon project completion. The individuals are otherwise homogeneous. I show that an asymmetric Markov perfect equilibrium (MPE) exists, which is either a completion equilibrium (where the good is provided) or a no-contribution equilibrium depending on the benefits asymmetry. A completion equilibrium does not require all the agents to contribute at every period. Along an MPE, an individual contributes from the beginning (\(t=0\)), irrespective of others’ contributions, if her flow benefit exceeds a contribution threshold. Individual contributions are strategic complements across time; however, the coefficient of strategic complementarity is independent of valuation asymmetry. A higher valuation individual makes a larger absolute contribution every period. I show that all the socially beneficial projects get completed in an asymmetric MPE when the higher valuation individual’s flow benefit exceeds that contribution threshold and that an asymmetric completion MPE is efficiency improving compared to its symmetric counterpart.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Economic Theory Bulletin is to provide an outlet for research in all areas of Economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning. The Economic Theory Bulletin together with Economic Theory are the official journals of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory.
The Economic Theory Bulletin is intended to publish:
1. Short papers/notes of substantial interest. Content is subject to the same standards as Economic Theory: research in all areas of economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning and on topics in mathematics that are supported by the analysis of economic problems. Published articles contribute to the understanding and solution of substantive economic problems. Theory papers with the substance and style for other journals that specialize in short papers are welcomed. Corollaries of already known results in the literature are not appropriate for publication.
2. Survey papers that clearly picture the basic ideas at work in the area, the essential technical apparatus that is used and the central questions that remain open.