Valuation asymmetry in the dynamic private provision of public goods

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
Subhra K. Bhattacharya
{"title":"Valuation asymmetry in the dynamic private provision of public goods","authors":"Subhra K. Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1007/s40505-023-00260-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I consider a dynamic game of private provision of a <i>discrete public good</i> by individuals who derive <i>asymmetric flow benefits</i> every period upon project completion. The individuals are otherwise homogeneous. I show that an asymmetric Markov perfect equilibrium (MPE) exists, which is either <i>a completion equilibrium</i> (where the good is provided) or <i>a no-contribution equilibrium</i> depending on the benefits asymmetry. A completion equilibrium <i>does not</i> require all the agents to contribute at every period. Along an MPE, an individual contributes from the beginning (<span>\\(t=0\\)</span>), irrespective of others’ contributions, if her flow benefit exceeds <i>a contribution threshold</i>. Individual contributions are <i>strategic complements</i> across time; however, the coefficient of strategic complementarity is independent of valuation asymmetry. A higher valuation individual makes a larger <i>absolute</i> contribution every period. I show that all the socially beneficial projects get completed in an asymmetric MPE when the higher valuation individual’s flow benefit exceeds that <i>contribution threshold</i> and that an asymmetric completion MPE is efficiency improving compared to its symmetric counterpart.</p>","PeriodicalId":40852,"journal":{"name":"Economic Theory Bulletin","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Theory Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40505-023-00260-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I consider a dynamic game of private provision of a discrete public good by individuals who derive asymmetric flow benefits every period upon project completion. The individuals are otherwise homogeneous. I show that an asymmetric Markov perfect equilibrium (MPE) exists, which is either a completion equilibrium (where the good is provided) or a no-contribution equilibrium depending on the benefits asymmetry. A completion equilibrium does not require all the agents to contribute at every period. Along an MPE, an individual contributes from the beginning (\(t=0\)), irrespective of others’ contributions, if her flow benefit exceeds a contribution threshold. Individual contributions are strategic complements across time; however, the coefficient of strategic complementarity is independent of valuation asymmetry. A higher valuation individual makes a larger absolute contribution every period. I show that all the socially beneficial projects get completed in an asymmetric MPE when the higher valuation individual’s flow benefit exceeds that contribution threshold and that an asymmetric completion MPE is efficiency improving compared to its symmetric counterpart.

动态私人提供公共产品中的估值不对称问题
我考虑的是一个由个人私人提供离散公共物品的动态博弈,这些个人在项目完成后每期都会获得不对称的流动收益。这些个体在其他方面是同质的。我的研究表明,非对称马尔可夫完全均衡(MPE)是存在的,它要么是完工均衡(提供物品),要么是无贡献均衡,这取决于收益的非对称性。完成均衡并不要求所有代理人在每个时期都做出贡献。在 MPE 中,如果一个人的流量收益超过了贡献阈值,那么无论其他人的贡献如何,他都会从一开始就贡献((t=0))。个人贡献是跨时间的战略互补;然而,战略互补系数与估值不对称无关。估值越高的人每期的绝对贡献越大。我的研究表明,在非对称 MPE 中,当估值较高的个人的流量收益超过该贡献阈值时,所有对社会有益的项目都会完成,而且非对称完成 MPE 与对称完成 MPE 相比会提高效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The purpose of Economic Theory Bulletin is to provide an outlet for research in all areas of Economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning. The Economic Theory Bulletin together with Economic Theory are the official journals of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory. The Economic Theory Bulletin is intended to publish: 1. Short papers/notes of substantial interest. Content is subject to the same standards as Economic Theory: research in all areas of economics based on rigorous theoretical reasoning and on topics in mathematics that are supported by the analysis of economic problems. Published articles contribute to the understanding and solution of substantive economic problems. Theory papers with the substance and style for other journals that specialize in short papers are welcomed. Corollaries of already known results in the literature are not appropriate for publication. 2. Survey papers that clearly picture the basic ideas at work in the area, the essential technical apparatus that is used and the central questions that remain open.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信