Bumblebees display stimulus-specific persistence behaviour after being trained on delayed reinforcement

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yonghe Zhou, HaDi MaBouDi, Chaoyang Peng, Hiruni Samadi Galpayage Dona, Selene Gutierrez Al-Khudhairy, Lars Chittka, Cwyn Solvi, Fei Peng
{"title":"Bumblebees display stimulus-specific persistence behaviour after being trained on delayed reinforcement","authors":"Yonghe Zhou, HaDi MaBouDi, Chaoyang Peng, Hiruni Samadi Galpayage Dona, Selene Gutierrez Al-Khudhairy, Lars Chittka, Cwyn Solvi, Fei Peng","doi":"10.1007/s00265-023-03414-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>In uncertain environments, animals often face the challenge of deciding whether to stay with their current foraging option or leave to pursue the next opportunity. The voluntary decision to persist at a location or with one option is a critical cognitive ability in animal temporal decision-making. Little is known about whether foraging insects form temporal expectations of reward and how these expectations affect their learning and rapid, short-term foraging decisions. Here, we trained bumblebees on a simple colour discrimination task whereby they entered different opaque tunnels surrounded by coloured discs (artificial flowers) and received reinforcement (appetitive sugar water or aversive quinine solution depending on flower colour). One group received reinforcement immediately and the other after a variable delay (0–3 s). We then recorded how long bees were willing to wait/persist when reinforcement was delayed indefinitely. Bumblebees trained with delays voluntarily stayed in tunnels longer than bees trained without delays. Delay-trained bees also waited/persisted longer after choosing the reward-associated flower compared to the punishment-associated flower, suggesting stimulus-specific temporal associations. Strikingly, while training with delayed reinforcement did not affect colour discrimination, it appeared to facilitate the generalisation of temporal associations to ambiguous stimuli in bumblebees. Our findings suggest that bumblebees can be trained to form temporal expectations, and that these expectations can be incorporated into their decision-making processes, highlighting bumblebees’ cognitive flexibility in temporal information usage.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Significance statement</h3><p>The willingness to voluntarily wait or persist for potential reward is a critical aspect of decision-making during foraging. Investigating the willingness to persist across various species can shed light on the evolutionary development of temporal decision-making and related processes. This study revealed that bumblebees trained with delays to reinforcement from individual flowers were able to form temporal expectations, which, in turn, generalised to ambiguous stimuli. These findings contribute to our understanding of temporal cognition in an insect and the potential effects of delayed rewards on foraging behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03414-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In uncertain environments, animals often face the challenge of deciding whether to stay with their current foraging option or leave to pursue the next opportunity. The voluntary decision to persist at a location or with one option is a critical cognitive ability in animal temporal decision-making. Little is known about whether foraging insects form temporal expectations of reward and how these expectations affect their learning and rapid, short-term foraging decisions. Here, we trained bumblebees on a simple colour discrimination task whereby they entered different opaque tunnels surrounded by coloured discs (artificial flowers) and received reinforcement (appetitive sugar water or aversive quinine solution depending on flower colour). One group received reinforcement immediately and the other after a variable delay (0–3 s). We then recorded how long bees were willing to wait/persist when reinforcement was delayed indefinitely. Bumblebees trained with delays voluntarily stayed in tunnels longer than bees trained without delays. Delay-trained bees also waited/persisted longer after choosing the reward-associated flower compared to the punishment-associated flower, suggesting stimulus-specific temporal associations. Strikingly, while training with delayed reinforcement did not affect colour discrimination, it appeared to facilitate the generalisation of temporal associations to ambiguous stimuli in bumblebees. Our findings suggest that bumblebees can be trained to form temporal expectations, and that these expectations can be incorporated into their decision-making processes, highlighting bumblebees’ cognitive flexibility in temporal information usage.

Significance statement

The willingness to voluntarily wait or persist for potential reward is a critical aspect of decision-making during foraging. Investigating the willingness to persist across various species can shed light on the evolutionary development of temporal decision-making and related processes. This study revealed that bumblebees trained with delays to reinforcement from individual flowers were able to form temporal expectations, which, in turn, generalised to ambiguous stimuli. These findings contribute to our understanding of temporal cognition in an insect and the potential effects of delayed rewards on foraging behaviour.

Abstract Image

大黄蜂在接受延迟强化训练后表现出刺激特异性持久行为
摘要 在不确定的环境中,动物经常面临的挑战是决定是留在当前的觅食选择还是离开去寻找下一个机会。在动物的时间决策中,自愿决定在某一地点或某一选择上坚持下去是一种关键的认知能力。关于觅食昆虫是否会形成对奖励的时间预期,以及这些预期如何影响它们的学习和快速、短期觅食决策,目前所知甚少。在这里,我们对熊蜂进行了一项简单的颜色辨别任务训练,即让它们进入由彩色圆盘(人造花)包围的不同不透明隧道,并接受强化(根据花的颜色,是开胃的糖水还是厌恶的奎宁溶液)。一组立即接受强化,另一组则在不同的延迟时间(0-3 秒)后接受强化。然后,我们记录了当强化无限期延迟时,蜜蜂愿意等待/坚持的时间。接受过延时训练的大黄蜂比没有接受过延时训练的大黄蜂在隧道中自愿停留的时间更长。与选择与惩罚相关的花朵相比,接受过延迟训练的蜜蜂在选择与奖励相关的花朵后等待/逗留的时间也更长,这表明刺激会产生特定的时间关联。令人吃惊的是,虽然延迟强化训练并不影响颜色辨别,但它似乎促进了熊蜂对模糊刺激的时间联想的泛化。我们的研究结果表明,熊蜂可以通过训练形成时间预期,而且这些预期可以被纳入它们的决策过程,这突出了熊蜂在时间信息使用方面的认知灵活性。研究不同物种的坚持意愿可以揭示时间决策及相关过程的进化发展。这项研究发现,熊蜂在接受个体花朵强化延迟训练后,能够形成时间预期,进而将这种预期推广到模棱两可的刺激上。这些发现有助于我们了解昆虫的时间认知以及延迟奖励对觅食行为的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信