Recreational beneficiaries and their landscape dependencies across national estuary program sites: Tillamook Bay (OR) and Tampa Bay (FL), USA.

IF 3.5 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Chanda Jones Littles, Nathaniel S Lewis, Theodore H DeWitt, Matthew C Harwell
{"title":"Recreational beneficiaries and their landscape dependencies across national estuary program sites: Tillamook Bay (OR) and Tampa Bay (FL), USA.","authors":"Chanda Jones Littles, Nathaniel S Lewis, Theodore H DeWitt, Matthew C Harwell","doi":"10.1080/26395916.2023.2276756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to characterize the value associated with nature-based recreational opportunities and identify estuarine attributes most valued by users. With the National Ecosystem Service Classification System as a framework, we assessed the relationship between recreational beneficiary subclasses and ecological end-products available to beneficiaries in Tillamook Bay, OR, and Tampa Bay, FL estuaries. We used the InVEST recreation model to assess the spatial distribution and intensity of recreation in both estuaries, then inform site selection in subsequent analyses. We evaluated photo content and collected observational data at sites with the highest utilization. Surveys of location attributes helped determine the availability of ecosystem service ecological end-products. Ordination techniques were employed to evaluate similarities in natural and human-made attributes across stations and establish groups of stations that could offer comparable recreational experiences. Recreational 'experiencers and viewers' were the dominant beneficiary group, as they took the most photos and were most often encountered during passive onsite observations. Composite features (e.g. viewscapes) were the predominant ecological end-products. Counter to hypothesized outcomes, there was no detectable difference in the number of recreational beneficiaries predicted between estuaries after accounting for site-scale variability. Locations with multiple natural and human-made attributes, including access points, had more recreational users. Onsite observations also revealed a potential need for more safe and equitable access options in high-use locations. Findings highlight the importance of recreational 'experiencers and viewers' valuing habitat mosaics, even across vastly different geographical settings. This exploration of how humans derive well-being from coastal landscapes is crucial to ecosystem-based management.</p>","PeriodicalId":72869,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2276756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to characterize the value associated with nature-based recreational opportunities and identify estuarine attributes most valued by users. With the National Ecosystem Service Classification System as a framework, we assessed the relationship between recreational beneficiary subclasses and ecological end-products available to beneficiaries in Tillamook Bay, OR, and Tampa Bay, FL estuaries. We used the InVEST recreation model to assess the spatial distribution and intensity of recreation in both estuaries, then inform site selection in subsequent analyses. We evaluated photo content and collected observational data at sites with the highest utilization. Surveys of location attributes helped determine the availability of ecosystem service ecological end-products. Ordination techniques were employed to evaluate similarities in natural and human-made attributes across stations and establish groups of stations that could offer comparable recreational experiences. Recreational 'experiencers and viewers' were the dominant beneficiary group, as they took the most photos and were most often encountered during passive onsite observations. Composite features (e.g. viewscapes) were the predominant ecological end-products. Counter to hypothesized outcomes, there was no detectable difference in the number of recreational beneficiaries predicted between estuaries after accounting for site-scale variability. Locations with multiple natural and human-made attributes, including access points, had more recreational users. Onsite observations also revealed a potential need for more safe and equitable access options in high-use locations. Findings highlight the importance of recreational 'experiencers and viewers' valuing habitat mosaics, even across vastly different geographical settings. This exploration of how humans derive well-being from coastal landscapes is crucial to ecosystem-based management.

国家河口计划地点的娱乐受益者及其景观依赖性:美国俄勒冈州蒂拉莫克湾和佛罗里达州坦帕湾。
本研究旨在描述与基于自然的娱乐机会相关的价值,并确定用户最看重的河口属性。以国家生态系统服务分类系统为框架,我们评估了俄勒冈州蒂拉莫克湾和佛罗里达州坦帕湾河口的娱乐受益人子类与受益人可获得的生态终端产品之间的关系。我们使用 InVEST 娱乐模型来评估这两个河口的娱乐空间分布和强度,为随后的分析提供选址依据。我们对照片内容进行了评估,并在利用率最高的地点收集了观察数据。对地点属性的调查有助于确定生态系统服务生态终端产品的可用性。我们采用了排序技术来评估各站点的自然和人为属性的相似性,并建立了可提供可比休闲体验的站点群。休闲 "体验者和观赏者 "是主要的受益群体,因为他们拍摄的照片最多,在被动的现场观察中也最常遇到。综合特征(如景观)是主要的生态最终产品。与假设的结果相反,在考虑了地点尺度的变化之后,预计河口之间的娱乐受益者人数没有明显的差异。具有多种自然和人为属性(包括出入口)的地点拥有更多的娱乐用户。现场观察还发现,在使用率高的地点,可能需要更多安全、公平的入口选择。研究结果凸显了娱乐 "体验者和观看者 "重视生境镶嵌的重要性,即使是在差异巨大的地理环境中也是如此。探索人类如何从沿岸景观中获得福祉对基于生态系统的管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信