Cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment after 6-24 h in ischaemic stroke patients with collateral flow on CT-angiography: A model-based economic evaluation of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Stroke Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1177/23969873231220464
Florentina Me Pinckaers, Silvia Maa Evers, Susanne Gh Olthuis, Hieronymus D Boogaarts, Alida A Postma, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Wim H van Zwam, Janneke Pc Grutters
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of endovascular treatment after 6-24 h in ischaemic stroke patients with collateral flow on CT-angiography: A model-based economic evaluation of the MR CLEAN-LATE trial.","authors":"Florentina Me Pinckaers, Silvia Maa Evers, Susanne Gh Olthuis, Hieronymus D Boogaarts, Alida A Postma, Robert J van Oostenbrugge, Wim H van Zwam, Janneke Pc Grutters","doi":"10.1177/23969873231220464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The MR CLEAN-LATE trial has shown that patient selection for endovascular treatment (EVT) in the late window (6-24 h after onset or last-seen-well) based on the presence of collateral flow on CT-angiography is safe and effective. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of late-window collateral-based EVT-selection compared to best medical management (BMM) over a lifetime horizon (until 95 years of age).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A model-based economic evaluation was performed from a societal perspective in The Netherlands. A decision tree was combined with a state-transition (Markov) model. Health states were defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Initial probabilities at 3-months post-stroke were based on MR CLEAN-LATE data. Transition probabilities were derived from previous literature. Information on short- and long-term resource use and utilities was obtained from a study using MR CLEAN-LATE and cross-sectional data. All costs are expressed in 2022 euros. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 4% and 1.5%, respectively. The effect of parameter uncertainty was assessed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the EVT strategy cost €159,592 (95% CI: €140,830-€180,154) and generated 3.46 QALYs (95% CI: 3.04-3.90) per patient, whereas the costs and QALYs associated with BMM were €149,935 (95% CI: €130,841-€171,776) and 2.88 (95% CI: 2.48-3.29), respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY and the incremental net monetary benefit were €16,442 and €19,710, respectively. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of €50,000/QALY, EVT was cost-effective in 87% of replications.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Collateral-based selection for late-window EVT is likely cost-effective from a societal perspective in The Netherlands.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873231220464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The MR CLEAN-LATE trial has shown that patient selection for endovascular treatment (EVT) in the late window (6-24 h after onset or last-seen-well) based on the presence of collateral flow on CT-angiography is safe and effective. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of late-window collateral-based EVT-selection compared to best medical management (BMM) over a lifetime horizon (until 95 years of age).

Materials and methods: A model-based economic evaluation was performed from a societal perspective in The Netherlands. A decision tree was combined with a state-transition (Markov) model. Health states were defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Initial probabilities at 3-months post-stroke were based on MR CLEAN-LATE data. Transition probabilities were derived from previous literature. Information on short- and long-term resource use and utilities was obtained from a study using MR CLEAN-LATE and cross-sectional data. All costs are expressed in 2022 euros. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at a rate of 4% and 1.5%, respectively. The effect of parameter uncertainty was assessed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA).

Results: On average, the EVT strategy cost €159,592 (95% CI: €140,830-€180,154) and generated 3.46 QALYs (95% CI: 3.04-3.90) per patient, whereas the costs and QALYs associated with BMM were €149,935 (95% CI: €130,841-€171,776) and 2.88 (95% CI: 2.48-3.29), respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY and the incremental net monetary benefit were €16,442 and €19,710, respectively. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of €50,000/QALY, EVT was cost-effective in 87% of replications.

Discussion and conclusion: Collateral-based selection for late-window EVT is likely cost-effective from a societal perspective in The Netherlands.

CT 血管造影显示有侧支血流的缺血性脑卒中患者 6-24 小时后进行血管内治疗的成本效益:基于模型的 MR CLEAN-LATE 试验经济评估。
背景:MR CLEAN-LATE 试验表明,根据 CT 血管造影显示的侧支血流情况,在晚窗口期(发病后 6-24 小时或最后一次见井后)选择患者进行血管内治疗 (EVT) 是安全有效的。我们的目的是评估与最佳医疗管理(BMM)相比,基于晚期侧支血流的 EVT 选择的成本效益:材料与方法:在荷兰从社会角度进行了基于模型的经济评估。决策树与状态转换(马尔可夫)模型相结合。健康状况由修正的兰金量表(mRS)定义。中风后 3 个月的初始概率基于 MR CLEAN-LATE 数据。过渡概率来自于以前的文献。有关短期和长期资源使用和效用的信息来自一项使用 MR CLEAN-LATE 和横断面数据的研究。所有成本均以 2022 欧元表示。成本和质量调整生命年的贴现率分别为 4% 和 1.5%。使用概率敏感性分析(PSA)评估了参数不确定性的影响:EVT策略平均每位患者的成本为159,592欧元(95% CI:140,830-180,154欧元),QALYs为3.46(95% CI:3.04-3.90),而BMM的相关成本和QALYs分别为149,935欧元(95% CI:130,841-171,776欧元)和2.88(95% CI:2.48-3.29)。每 QALY 的增量成本效益比和增量净货币效益分别为 16,442 欧元和 19,710 欧元。在 50,000 欧元/QALY 的成本效益阈值下,EVT 在 87% 的重复中具有成本效益:讨论与结论:从社会角度来看,在荷兰,基于侧支选择晚窗EVT可能具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信