Should continuous deep sedation until death be legally regulated in Switzerland? An exploratory study with palliative care physicians.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-25 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524231219509
Martyna Tomczyk, Roberto Andorno, Ralf J Jox
{"title":"Should continuous deep sedation until death be legally regulated in Switzerland? An exploratory study with palliative care physicians.","authors":"Martyna Tomczyk, Roberto Andorno, Ralf J Jox","doi":"10.1177/26323524231219509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Switzerland, continuous deep sedation until death (CDSUD) is not legally regulated and the current clinical practice guidelines on palliative sedation from 2005 do not refer to it. In contrast, in France, a neighbouring country, CDSUD is regulated by a specific law and professional guidelines. International studies show that in culturally polymorphic countries, there are variations in the end-of-life practices between linguistic regions and that a linguistic region shares many cultural characteristics with the neighbouring country.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the attitudes of palliative care physicians from the French-speaking part of Switzerland on the question of whether CDSUD should be legally regulated in the country, and to identify their arguments. Our study also aimed to assess whether a hypothetical Swiss law on CDSUD should be similar to the current legal regulation of this practice in France.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a multicentre exploratory qualitative study based on face-to-face interviews with palliative care physicians in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed the interview transcripts using thematic analysis, combining deductive and inductive coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the participants were opposed to having specific legal regulation of CDSUD in Switzerland. Their arguments were diverse: some focused on medical and epistemological aspects of CDSUD, whereas others emphasized the legal inconvenience of having such regulation. None had the opinion that, if CDSUD were legally regulated in Switzerland, the regulation should be similar to that in France.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study allows to better understand why palliative care physicians in French-speaking Switzerland may be reluctant to have legal regulation of CDSUD. Further studies covering the whole country would be needed to gain a more complete picture of Swiss palliative care physicians on this question.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10752051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231219509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Switzerland, continuous deep sedation until death (CDSUD) is not legally regulated and the current clinical practice guidelines on palliative sedation from 2005 do not refer to it. In contrast, in France, a neighbouring country, CDSUD is regulated by a specific law and professional guidelines. International studies show that in culturally polymorphic countries, there are variations in the end-of-life practices between linguistic regions and that a linguistic region shares many cultural characteristics with the neighbouring country.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the attitudes of palliative care physicians from the French-speaking part of Switzerland on the question of whether CDSUD should be legally regulated in the country, and to identify their arguments. Our study also aimed to assess whether a hypothetical Swiss law on CDSUD should be similar to the current legal regulation of this practice in France.

Design: We conducted a multicentre exploratory qualitative study based on face-to-face interviews with palliative care physicians in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.

Methods: We analysed the interview transcripts using thematic analysis, combining deductive and inductive coding.

Results: Most of the participants were opposed to having specific legal regulation of CDSUD in Switzerland. Their arguments were diverse: some focused on medical and epistemological aspects of CDSUD, whereas others emphasized the legal inconvenience of having such regulation. None had the opinion that, if CDSUD were legally regulated in Switzerland, the regulation should be similar to that in France.

Conclusion: This study allows to better understand why palliative care physicians in French-speaking Switzerland may be reluctant to have legal regulation of CDSUD. Further studies covering the whole country would be needed to gain a more complete picture of Swiss palliative care physicians on this question.

瑞士是否应该对持续深度镇静直至死亡进行法律监管?一项针对姑息治疗医生的探索性研究。
背景:在瑞士,持续深度镇静至死(CDSUD)并没有受到法律监管,2005 年颁布的现行姑息镇静临床实践指南也没有提及这一点。与此相反,在邻国法国,持续深度镇静直至死亡(CDSUD)受到专门法律和专业指南的规范。国际研究表明,在文化多态的国家中,不同语言地区的临终关怀实践存在差异,而且一个语言地区与邻国有许多共同的文化特征:本研究旨在探讨瑞士法语区姑息治疗医生对瑞士是否应在法律上规范 CDSUD 这一问题的态度,并找出他们的论据。我们的研究还旨在评估瑞士关于CDSUD的假定法律是否应类似于法国目前对这一做法的法律规定:我们对瑞士法语区的姑息关怀医生进行了面对面访谈,在此基础上开展了一项多中心探索性定性研究:我们采用主题分析法对访谈记录进行了分析,将演绎和归纳编码相结合:结果:大多数参与者都反对瑞士对 CDSUD 制定专门的法律规定。他们的论点多种多样:一些人侧重于 CDSUD 的医学和认识论方面,而另一些人则强调制定此类法规在法律上的不便。没有人认为,如果瑞士对 CDSUD 进行法律监管,那么监管方式应与法国类似:本研究有助于更好地理解瑞士法语区姑息关怀医生不愿对 CDSUD 进行法律监管的原因。要想更全面地了解瑞士姑息关怀医生对这一问题的看法,还需要在全国范围内开展进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信