Feasibility and value of a domiciliary spirometry programme in the assessment of severe asthma: a real-world evaluation.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2023-12-27 eCollection Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00635-2023
Zander Williams, James H Hull, Yueqi Ge, Jo Ming, Cara Roberts, Serena Rhamie, Pujan H Patel
{"title":"Feasibility and value of a domiciliary spirometry programme in the assessment of severe asthma: a real-world evaluation.","authors":"Zander Williams, James H Hull, Yueqi Ge, Jo Ming, Cara Roberts, Serena Rhamie, Pujan H Patel","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00635-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Domiciliary spirometry (DS) is a novel tool that is widely employed in the assessment of respiratory disease. We assessed real-world feasibility, effectiveness and value of a physiologist-led home spirometry programme in patients with treatment-refractory severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were referred and provided with a hand-held DS device. Patients completed baseline measurements in a physiologist-led virtual clinic and were instructed to provide further values during any periods of respiratory symptoms. Outcome measures included prevalence of new obstructed events, DS adherence and uptake of this approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>112 patients were enrolled from November 2020 to January 2023. 102 individuals, mean±sd age 44±13 years (86% female) with median (IQR) forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted 88% (77-97%), successfully recorded baseline spirometry values. During follow-up (24 months), 11 (11%) were identified with new obstructive spirometry and were subsequently able to be commenced on biologic therapy. Patient engagement was poor with median (IQR) of 4 (2-6) attempts of contact made before baseline values were recorded, and 2 (1-3) attempts required to record technically acceptable values. Continued DS use was suboptimal; 34% failed to use their device after baseline and only 10% continued at the end of the study period. The cost of DS measurements was greater than a single hospital-based visit but enables multiple event capture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, DS measurement uptake was poor, with a minority of patients continuing to use the device at the end of the study period. However, for those that engage, DS provides an alternative approach to traditional hospital-based spirometry measurements that can alter clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10752269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00635-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Domiciliary spirometry (DS) is a novel tool that is widely employed in the assessment of respiratory disease. We assessed real-world feasibility, effectiveness and value of a physiologist-led home spirometry programme in patients with treatment-refractory severe asthma.

Methods: Patients were referred and provided with a hand-held DS device. Patients completed baseline measurements in a physiologist-led virtual clinic and were instructed to provide further values during any periods of respiratory symptoms. Outcome measures included prevalence of new obstructed events, DS adherence and uptake of this approach.

Results: 112 patients were enrolled from November 2020 to January 2023. 102 individuals, mean±sd age 44±13 years (86% female) with median (IQR) forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted 88% (77-97%), successfully recorded baseline spirometry values. During follow-up (24 months), 11 (11%) were identified with new obstructive spirometry and were subsequently able to be commenced on biologic therapy. Patient engagement was poor with median (IQR) of 4 (2-6) attempts of contact made before baseline values were recorded, and 2 (1-3) attempts required to record technically acceptable values. Continued DS use was suboptimal; 34% failed to use their device after baseline and only 10% continued at the end of the study period. The cost of DS measurements was greater than a single hospital-based visit but enables multiple event capture.

Conclusion: Overall, DS measurement uptake was poor, with a minority of patients continuing to use the device at the end of the study period. However, for those that engage, DS provides an alternative approach to traditional hospital-based spirometry measurements that can alter clinical management.

家庭肺活量测量计划在评估严重哮喘中的可行性和价值:真实世界评估。
背景:家庭肺活量测定(DS)是一种新型工具,被广泛用于呼吸系统疾病的评估。我们评估了由生理学家主导的家庭肺活量测量项目在治疗难治性重症哮喘患者中的实际可行性、有效性和价值:方法:患者被转诊并获得手持式 DS 设备。患者在生理学家主导的虚拟诊所完成基线测量,并被要求在出现呼吸道症状期间提供进一步的测量值。结果测量包括新阻塞事件的发生率、DS的坚持率和对这种方法的接受率:112 名患者于 2020 年 11 月至 2023 年 1 月期间入组。102人,平均年龄(±sd)为44±13岁(86%为女性),1秒内用力呼气容积中位数(IQR)预测值为88%(77-97%),成功记录了基线肺活量值。在随访期间(24 个月),发现 11 例(11%)患者出现新的阻塞性肺活量,随后开始接受生物治疗。患者参与度较低,在记录基线值之前,患者尝试联系的次数中位数(IQR)为 4 次(2-6 次),记录技术上可接受的数值需要 2 次(1-3 次)。继续使用 DS 的情况并不理想;34% 的人在基线后没有使用设备,只有 10% 的人在研究结束时继续使用。DS 测量的成本高于单次医院就诊,但可以捕捉多个事件:总体而言,DS 测量的使用率较低,只有少数患者在研究结束时继续使用该设备。然而,对于那些参与的患者,DS 提供了一种替代传统医院肺活量测量的方法,可以改变临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信