Spinal Cord Stimulation Meets Them All: An Effective Treatment for Different Pain Conditions. Our Experience and Literature Review.

Q2 Medicine
Giuseppe Roberto Giammalva, Federica Paolini, Lapo Bonosi, Flavia Meccio, Luigi Basile, Francesca Graziano, Mariangela Pino, Rosa Maria Gerardi, Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana, Domenico Gerardo Iacopino, Rosario Maugeri
{"title":"Spinal Cord Stimulation Meets Them All: An Effective Treatment for Different Pain Conditions. Our Experience and Literature Review.","authors":"Giuseppe Roberto Giammalva, Federica Paolini, Lapo Bonosi, Flavia Meccio, Luigi Basile, Francesca Graziano, Mariangela Pino, Rosa Maria Gerardi, Giuseppe Emmanuele Umana, Domenico Gerardo Iacopino, Rosario Maugeri","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionSpinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an emerging minimally invasive technique which uses neuromodulation to manage different forms of intractable pain. SCS is a well-established option for the treatment of various pain conditions, and nowadays, indications are ever increasing.Materials and MethodsIn this study, we present our case series of 49 patients who underwent SCS at our Institution for the treatment of pain from different etiologies, and discuss our 10-year experience in SCS. For the purpose of this study, we also performed a systematic review of current indications and new perspectives in SCS.ResultsAmong our case series, patients were differentiated into two groups upon prior spinal surgery: patients who had undergone prior spinal surgery for back pain were defined as the \"FBSS (failed back surgery syndrome) group,\" instead patient suffering from different types of pain but who had never undergone surgery were defined as the \"naive group.\" As regards clinical response to SCS, 20 patients out of 36 (55.56%) were classified as responders in the FBSS group; in the \"naïve\" group, 10 patients out of 13 (76.92%) were classified as responders. Among the \"not responders\" group, several patients suffered from infections.Of the recent literature about SCS, 2124 records were screened and 37 studies were finally included in the qualitative synthesis for our systematic review.DiscussionIn case of FBSS, surgical revision is often associated with a high morbidity and corresponding low rates of success. Unfortunately, patients affected by chronic pain often become refractory to conservative treatments. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is nowadays considered as an effective therapy for several chronic and neuropathic pain conditions, such as failed back surgery syndrome. As regards the economic impact of SCS, implantation of an SCS system results in short-term costs increase, but the annual cumulative costs decrease during the following years after implantation, when compared to the costs of conventional management. Beyond the application for the treatment of FBSS, SCS has also been used for the treatment of other types of chronic non-oncological pain such as neuropathic pain and chronic back pain ineligible for surgical intervention. This evidence paved the way to establishing the potential role of SCS also for the treatment of oncological pain. However, the effectiveness and relative safety of SCS for cancer-related pain has not yet been adequately established.ConclusionsSpinal Cord Stimulation is a well-established treatment option in for FBSS. Beyond that, SCS has also been used for the treatment of \"naive\" patients, suffering from other types of chronic, both oncological and non-oncological, medical-refractory pain such as neuropathic pain and chronic back pain ineligible for surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":6913,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement","volume":"135 ","pages":"179-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionSpinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an emerging minimally invasive technique which uses neuromodulation to manage different forms of intractable pain. SCS is a well-established option for the treatment of various pain conditions, and nowadays, indications are ever increasing.Materials and MethodsIn this study, we present our case series of 49 patients who underwent SCS at our Institution for the treatment of pain from different etiologies, and discuss our 10-year experience in SCS. For the purpose of this study, we also performed a systematic review of current indications and new perspectives in SCS.ResultsAmong our case series, patients were differentiated into two groups upon prior spinal surgery: patients who had undergone prior spinal surgery for back pain were defined as the "FBSS (failed back surgery syndrome) group," instead patient suffering from different types of pain but who had never undergone surgery were defined as the "naive group." As regards clinical response to SCS, 20 patients out of 36 (55.56%) were classified as responders in the FBSS group; in the "naïve" group, 10 patients out of 13 (76.92%) were classified as responders. Among the "not responders" group, several patients suffered from infections.Of the recent literature about SCS, 2124 records were screened and 37 studies were finally included in the qualitative synthesis for our systematic review.DiscussionIn case of FBSS, surgical revision is often associated with a high morbidity and corresponding low rates of success. Unfortunately, patients affected by chronic pain often become refractory to conservative treatments. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is nowadays considered as an effective therapy for several chronic and neuropathic pain conditions, such as failed back surgery syndrome. As regards the economic impact of SCS, implantation of an SCS system results in short-term costs increase, but the annual cumulative costs decrease during the following years after implantation, when compared to the costs of conventional management. Beyond the application for the treatment of FBSS, SCS has also been used for the treatment of other types of chronic non-oncological pain such as neuropathic pain and chronic back pain ineligible for surgical intervention. This evidence paved the way to establishing the potential role of SCS also for the treatment of oncological pain. However, the effectiveness and relative safety of SCS for cancer-related pain has not yet been adequately established.ConclusionsSpinal Cord Stimulation is a well-established treatment option in for FBSS. Beyond that, SCS has also been used for the treatment of "naive" patients, suffering from other types of chronic, both oncological and non-oncological, medical-refractory pain such as neuropathic pain and chronic back pain ineligible for surgical intervention.

脊髓刺激疗法满足所有需求:不同疼痛病症的有效治疗方法。我们的经验和文献综述。
导言脊髓刺激(SCS)是一种新兴的微创技术,利用神经调控来治疗不同形式的顽固性疼痛。在本研究中,我们介绍了在本院接受脊髓刺激术治疗不同病因疼痛的 49 例患者的病例系列,并讨论了我们在脊髓刺激术方面的 10 年经验。结果在我们的病例系列中,患者因曾接受过脊柱手术而被分为两组:曾因背部疼痛接受过脊柱手术的患者被定义为 "FBSS(背部手术失败综合征)组",而患有不同类型疼痛但从未接受过手术的患者被定义为 "幼稚组"。至于对 SCS 的临床反应,在 FBSS 组的 36 名患者中,有 20 名(55.56%)对 SCS 有反应;在 "天真 "组的 13 名患者中,有 10 名(76.92%)对 SCS 有反应。在近期有关 SCS 的文献中,我们筛选了 2124 条记录,最终将 37 项研究纳入了系统综述的定性综述中。讨论在 FBSS 患者中,手术翻修往往与高发病率和相应的低成功率相关。不幸的是,慢性疼痛患者往往对保守治疗无效。如今,脊髓刺激疗法(SCS)被认为是治疗背部手术失败综合征等多种慢性和神经性疼痛的有效疗法。就脊髓刺激系统对经济的影响而言,与传统疗法的费用相比,植入脊髓刺激系统会导致短期费用增加,但在植入后的几年中,每年的累积费用会减少。除用于治疗 FBSS 外,SCS 还被用于治疗其他类型的慢性非肿瘤性疼痛,如神经性疼痛和不适合手术治疗的慢性背痛。这些证据为确立 SCS 在治疗肿瘤性疼痛方面的潜在作用铺平了道路。然而,脊髓刺激治疗对癌症相关疼痛的有效性和相对安全性尚未得到充分证实。除此以外,脊髓刺激疗法还被用于治疗 "天真 "患者、其他类型的慢性(包括肿瘤性和非肿瘤性)药物难治性疼痛,如神经病理性疼痛和不适合手术治疗的慢性背痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: In addition to the regular journal, "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes 3-4 supplement volumes per year. These comprise proceedings of international meetings or other material of general neurosurgical interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信