Effect of prehospital advanced airway management on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to asphyxia: A JAAM-OHCA registry-based observational study in Japan

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Naofumi Bunya, Ohnishi Hirofumi, Yutaka Igarashi, Tatsuya Norii, Yoichi Katayama, Takehiko Kasai, Keigo Sawamoto, Eichi Narimatsu
{"title":"Effect of prehospital advanced airway management on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to asphyxia: A JAAM-OHCA registry-based observational study in Japan","authors":"Naofumi Bunya,&nbsp;Ohnishi Hirofumi,&nbsp;Yutaka Igarashi,&nbsp;Tatsuya Norii,&nbsp;Yoichi Katayama,&nbsp;Takehiko Kasai,&nbsp;Keigo Sawamoto,&nbsp;Eichi Narimatsu","doi":"10.1002/ams2.912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the relationship between prehospital advanced airway management (AAM) and neurological outcomes in patients with asphyxia-related out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA registry between June 2014 and December 2017. Patients with asphyxia-related cardiac arrest aged ≥18 years were included. The primary outcome was a 1-month favorable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category [CPC] 1–2).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 34,754 patients in the 2014–2017 JAAM-OHCA Registry, 1956 were included in our analysis. Cerebral performance category 1–2 was observed in 31 patients (1.6%), while CPC 3–5 was observed in 1925 patients (98.4%). Although prehospital AAM was associated with unfavorable neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.269; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.114–0.633; <i>p</i> = 0.003) in the univariate analysis, the association was not significant in the multivariate analysis. Compared with the AAM group, the non-AAM group showed increased rates of cardiac arrest after emergency medical service contact (4.3 vs. 7.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and Glasgow Coma Scale ≥4 at hospital admission (1.9% vs. 4.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Among the 903 patients for whom the time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) could be calculated, the time from witnessed cardiac arrest to ROSC was significantly shorter (median, 8.5 vs. 37.0 min; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) for those with favorable neurological outcomes than for those without.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Prehospital AAM is not associated with improved neurological outcomes among those with asphyxia-related OHCA. However, the time from cardiac arrest to the first ROSC was significantly shorter among those with favorable outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ams2.912","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To investigate the relationship between prehospital advanced airway management (AAM) and neurological outcomes in patients with asphyxia-related out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA registry between June 2014 and December 2017. Patients with asphyxia-related cardiac arrest aged ≥18 years were included. The primary outcome was a 1-month favorable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category [CPC] 1–2).

Results

Of the 34,754 patients in the 2014–2017 JAAM-OHCA Registry, 1956 were included in our analysis. Cerebral performance category 1–2 was observed in 31 patients (1.6%), while CPC 3–5 was observed in 1925 patients (98.4%). Although prehospital AAM was associated with unfavorable neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.269; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.114–0.633; p = 0.003) in the univariate analysis, the association was not significant in the multivariate analysis. Compared with the AAM group, the non-AAM group showed increased rates of cardiac arrest after emergency medical service contact (4.3 vs. 7.2%, p = 0.009) and Glasgow Coma Scale ≥4 at hospital admission (1.9% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.004). Among the 903 patients for whom the time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) could be calculated, the time from witnessed cardiac arrest to ROSC was significantly shorter (median, 8.5 vs. 37.0 min; p < 0.001) for those with favorable neurological outcomes than for those without.

Conclusion

Prehospital AAM is not associated with improved neurological outcomes among those with asphyxia-related OHCA. However, the time from cardiac arrest to the first ROSC was significantly shorter among those with favorable outcomes.

Abstract Image

院前高级气道管理对院外窒息导致的心脏骤停的影响:基于日本 JAAM-OHCA 登记的观察研究
目的 研究院前高级气道管理(AAM)与窒息相关院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者神经系统预后之间的关系。 方法 我们回顾性分析了 2014 年 6 月至 2017 年 12 月期间日本急症医学协会 OHCA 登记的数据。纳入的窒息相关心脏骤停患者年龄≥18 岁。主要结果是1个月的良好神经功能结果(脑功能类别[CPC] 1-2)。 结果 在2014-2017年JAAM-OHCA登记的34754名患者中,有1956名患者纳入了我们的分析。31名患者(1.6%)的脑功能类别为1-2,而1925名患者(98.4%)的脑功能类别为3-5。虽然在单变量分析中,院前 AAM 与不利的神经系统预后相关(几率比 [OR],0.269;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.114-0.633;P = 0.003),但在多变量分析中,这种关联并不显著。与急性心肌梗死组相比,非急性心肌梗死组患者在接触紧急医疗服务后心脏骤停的发生率(4.3% vs. 7.2%,p = 0.009)和入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表≥4的发生率(1.9% vs. 4.7%,p = 0.004)均有所增加。在可以计算自发性循环恢复时间(ROSC)的 903 名患者中,从目击心脏骤停到自发性循环恢复的时间,神经系统预后良好的患者明显短于神经系统预后不良的患者(中位数,8.5 分钟 vs. 37.0 分钟;p < 0.001)。 结论 院前 AAM 与窒息相关 OHCA 患者神经系统预后的改善无关。但是,在预后良好的患者中,从心脏骤停到首次 ROSC 的时间明显缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信