A machine learning approach to identifying non-parental caregivers' risk for harsh caregiving towards infants in daycare centers

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Chen Sharon , Sofie Rousseau
{"title":"A machine learning approach to identifying non-parental caregivers' risk for harsh caregiving towards infants in daycare centers","authors":"Chen Sharon ,&nbsp;Sofie Rousseau","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Harsh Caregiving behavior amongst daycare providers (i.e., non-parental Harsh Caregiving) negatively impacts children's development across a variety of domains. As prevalences of non-parental Harsh Caregiving appear to increase worldwide, identifying its predictors is crucial for screening and intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to identify a set of indicators and predictive rules that may accurately predict women's risk for Harsh Caregiving behavior in daycare environments.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and Setting</h3><p>The study recruited 75 female non-parental caregivers, from the general population, who work with infants aged 0-1. Caregivers filled out self-report questionnaires including a Harsh Caregiving measure as well as a broad variety of potential predictors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To elucidate combinations of input variables that are predictive of non-parental Harsh Caregiving, we used machine learning Decision Three Inference and CHAID algorithms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Study results revealed a predictive model including 27 questions and four different prediction paths. For example, the first path indicated that women who reported low levels of attention deficit and hyperactivity problems and low levels of rigid-negative caregiving philosophies, had 100 % chance to report low levels of Harsh Caregiving behavior. Overall classification accuracy for \"High Harsh Caregiving behavior\" was 95.2 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>After replication in larger samples, the model can be used as a screening tool for women expressing their wish to work with infants. Women at risk can either be declined employment or alternatively receive targeted supervision throughout their work with small infants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 128-138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200623001692","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Harsh Caregiving behavior amongst daycare providers (i.e., non-parental Harsh Caregiving) negatively impacts children's development across a variety of domains. As prevalences of non-parental Harsh Caregiving appear to increase worldwide, identifying its predictors is crucial for screening and intervention.

Objective

The goal of this study was to identify a set of indicators and predictive rules that may accurately predict women's risk for Harsh Caregiving behavior in daycare environments.

Participants and Setting

The study recruited 75 female non-parental caregivers, from the general population, who work with infants aged 0-1. Caregivers filled out self-report questionnaires including a Harsh Caregiving measure as well as a broad variety of potential predictors.

Methods

To elucidate combinations of input variables that are predictive of non-parental Harsh Caregiving, we used machine learning Decision Three Inference and CHAID algorithms.

Results

Study results revealed a predictive model including 27 questions and four different prediction paths. For example, the first path indicated that women who reported low levels of attention deficit and hyperactivity problems and low levels of rigid-negative caregiving philosophies, had 100 % chance to report low levels of Harsh Caregiving behavior. Overall classification accuracy for "High Harsh Caregiving behavior" was 95.2 %.

Conclusions

After replication in larger samples, the model can be used as a screening tool for women expressing their wish to work with infants. Women at risk can either be declined employment or alternatively receive targeted supervision throughout their work with small infants.

用机器学习方法识别日托中心非父母照料者对婴儿进行粗暴照料的风险
背景日托提供者的粗暴照料行为(即非父母粗暴照料)对儿童在各个领域的发展产生了负面影响。本研究的目的是确定一套指标和预测规则,这些指标和规则可以准确预测日托环境中女性粗暴照料行为的风险。参与者和研究环境本研究从普通人群中招募了 75 名女性非父母照料者,她们从事 0-1 岁婴儿的照料工作。护理人员填写了自我报告问卷,其中包括一项 "苛刻护理 "测量以及各种潜在的预测因素。方法为了阐明可预测非父母 "苛刻护理 "的输入变量组合,我们使用了机器学习决策三推理和 CHAID 算法。例如,第一条路径表明,报告注意力缺陷和多动问题程度低和护理理念僵化消极程度低的女性,有 100% 的机会报告低程度的 "苛刻护理 "行为。结论在对更大样本进行复制后,该模型可作为筛选工具,用于筛选表示希望从事婴儿工作的妇女。对于有风险的妇女,可以拒绝聘用,或者在她们与小婴儿一起工作的整个过程中对她们进行有针对性的监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信