Effects of the cardiac cycle on auditory processing: A preregistered study on mismatch negativity.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14506
Lingjun Li, Kai Ishida, Keita Mizuhara, Robert J Barry, Hiroshi Nittono
{"title":"Effects of the cardiac cycle on auditory processing: A preregistered study on mismatch negativity.","authors":"Lingjun Li, Kai Ishida, Keita Mizuhara, Robert J Barry, Hiroshi Nittono","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle are known to affect perception and cognition differently. Higher order processing tends to be facilitated at systole, whereas sensory processing of external stimuli tends to be impaired at systole compared to diastole. The current study aims to examine whether the cardiac cycle affects auditory deviance detection, as reflected in the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the event-related brain potential (ERP). We recorded the intensity deviance response to deviant tones (70 dB) presented among standard tones (60 or 80 dB, depending on blocks) and calculated the MMN by subtracting standard ERP waveforms from deviant ERP waveforms. We also assessed intensity-dependent N1 and P2 amplitude changes by subtracting ERPs elicited by soft standard tones (60 dB) from ERPs elicited by loud standard tones (80 dB). These subtraction methods were used to eliminate phase-locked cardiac-related electric artifacts that overlap auditory ERPs. The endogenous MMN was expected to be larger at systole, reflecting the facilitation of memory-based auditory deviance detection, whereas the exogenous N1 and P2 would be smaller at systole, reflecting impaired exteroceptive sensory processing. However, after the elimination of cardiac-related artifacts, there were no significant differences between systole and diastole in any ERP components. The intensity-dependent N1 and P2 amplitude changes were not obvious in either cardiac phase, probably because of the short interstimulus intervals. The lack of a cardiac phase effect on MMN amplitude suggests that preattentive auditory processing may not be affected by bodily signals from the heart.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle are known to affect perception and cognition differently. Higher order processing tends to be facilitated at systole, whereas sensory processing of external stimuli tends to be impaired at systole compared to diastole. The current study aims to examine whether the cardiac cycle affects auditory deviance detection, as reflected in the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the event-related brain potential (ERP). We recorded the intensity deviance response to deviant tones (70 dB) presented among standard tones (60 or 80 dB, depending on blocks) and calculated the MMN by subtracting standard ERP waveforms from deviant ERP waveforms. We also assessed intensity-dependent N1 and P2 amplitude changes by subtracting ERPs elicited by soft standard tones (60 dB) from ERPs elicited by loud standard tones (80 dB). These subtraction methods were used to eliminate phase-locked cardiac-related electric artifacts that overlap auditory ERPs. The endogenous MMN was expected to be larger at systole, reflecting the facilitation of memory-based auditory deviance detection, whereas the exogenous N1 and P2 would be smaller at systole, reflecting impaired exteroceptive sensory processing. However, after the elimination of cardiac-related artifacts, there were no significant differences between systole and diastole in any ERP components. The intensity-dependent N1 and P2 amplitude changes were not obvious in either cardiac phase, probably because of the short interstimulus intervals. The lack of a cardiac phase effect on MMN amplitude suggests that preattentive auditory processing may not be affected by bodily signals from the heart.

心动周期对听觉处理的影响:关于失配否定性的预先登记研究。
众所周知,心动周期的收缩期和舒张期会对感知和认知产生不同的影响。收缩期往往有利于高阶处理,而与舒张期相比,收缩期对外部刺激的感官处理往往会受损。本研究旨在探讨心动周期是否会影响听觉偏差检测,这反映在事件相关脑电位(ERP)的错配负性(MMN)上。我们记录了在标准音调(60 或 80 dB,取决于区块)中出现的偏差音调(70 dB)的强度偏差反应,并通过从偏差 ERP 波形中减去标准 ERP 波形来计算 MMN。我们还评估了与强度相关的 N1 和 P2 振幅变化,方法是将柔和的标准音调(60 dB)引起的 ERP 波形从响亮的标准音调(80 dB)引起的 ERP 波形中减去。这些减法用于消除与听觉ERP重叠的锁相心电伪影。预计内源性 MMN 在收缩期会变大,这反映了基于记忆的听觉偏差检测的促进作用,而外源性 N1 和 P2 在收缩期会变小,这反映了外感知感觉处理的受损。然而,在消除心脏相关伪影后,收缩期和舒张期的ERP成分均无显著差异。与强度相关的 N1 和 P2 振幅变化在任何一个心动相位都不明显,这可能是因为刺激间期较短。心动相位对 MMN 振幅没有影响表明,前注意听觉处理可能不会受到来自心脏的身体信号的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信