Certified Nurse-Midwives as Teachers: Expanding Interprofessional Collaboration Learning Opportunities for Medical Students on the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Angela C. Liang MD, Anita Malone MD, Emily K. Kobernik PhD, MPH, Elizabeth Holman DrPh, MEd, MSc, Maya M. Hammoud MD, MBA, Christina Majszak CNM, Samantha Kempner MD, Helen K. Morgan MD
{"title":"Certified Nurse-Midwives as Teachers: Expanding Interprofessional Collaboration Learning Opportunities for Medical Students on the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship","authors":"Angela C. Liang MD,&nbsp;Anita Malone MD,&nbsp;Emily K. Kobernik PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Elizabeth Holman DrPh, MEd, MSc,&nbsp;Maya M. Hammoud MD, MBA,&nbsp;Christina Majszak CNM,&nbsp;Samantha Kempner MD,&nbsp;Helen K. Morgan MD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Interprofessional experiences provide critical exposure to collaborative health care teams, yet medical students often lack this experience during clinical clerkships. We created a labor and delivery triage rotation exclusively staffed by certified nurse-midwives in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship to address this gap. We sought to evaluate the clinical learning experiences of medical students rotating on this midwife-supervised collaborative team.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Between 2018 and 2020, we electronically sent all medical students an evaluation after each required clerkship. Our primary outcome was the quality of teaching score, as defined by level of agreement on a 5-point Likert scale with a statement regarding teaching quality. A secondary outcome evaluated scores from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Obstetrics and Gynecology subject examination taken by all students at the end of the rotation. Evaluations and assessments were compared between students rotating on labor and delivery triage and those who did not. Evaluation comments from students rotating on labor and delivery triage were collated to identify common themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 374 students, 370 (98.9%) completed the end-of-clerkship course evaluation and 312 (83.4%) completed teaching evaluations. Sixty-seven students (17.9%) rotated in labor and delivery triage; of these, 52 (77.6%) completed both the course and triage rotation evaluations. There were no differences in the mean quality of teaching scores (3.9 ± 1.2 versus 3.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.54) or in NBME Obstetrics and Gynecology subject examination scores between students rotating in labor and delivery triage compared to all other rotations (79.9% ± 7.2% vs 80.2% ± 7.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.436). Comments from teaching evaluations highlighted student exposure to the midwifery philosophy of care model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This work demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of this midwife-led authentic interprofessional collaborative experience for medical students. This model can serve as an example of how to implement and evaluate interprofessional collaboration experiences in the clinical setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13602","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Interprofessional experiences provide critical exposure to collaborative health care teams, yet medical students often lack this experience during clinical clerkships. We created a labor and delivery triage rotation exclusively staffed by certified nurse-midwives in the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship to address this gap. We sought to evaluate the clinical learning experiences of medical students rotating on this midwife-supervised collaborative team.

Methods

Between 2018 and 2020, we electronically sent all medical students an evaluation after each required clerkship. Our primary outcome was the quality of teaching score, as defined by level of agreement on a 5-point Likert scale with a statement regarding teaching quality. A secondary outcome evaluated scores from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Obstetrics and Gynecology subject examination taken by all students at the end of the rotation. Evaluations and assessments were compared between students rotating on labor and delivery triage and those who did not. Evaluation comments from students rotating on labor and delivery triage were collated to identify common themes.

Results

Of 374 students, 370 (98.9%) completed the end-of-clerkship course evaluation and 312 (83.4%) completed teaching evaluations. Sixty-seven students (17.9%) rotated in labor and delivery triage; of these, 52 (77.6%) completed both the course and triage rotation evaluations. There were no differences in the mean quality of teaching scores (3.9 ± 1.2 versus 3.8 ± 1.2, p = 0.54) or in NBME Obstetrics and Gynecology subject examination scores between students rotating in labor and delivery triage compared to all other rotations (79.9% ± 7.2% vs 80.2% ± 7.8%, P = 0.436). Comments from teaching evaluations highlighted student exposure to the midwifery philosophy of care model.

Discussion

This work demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of this midwife-led authentic interprofessional collaborative experience for medical students. This model can serve as an example of how to implement and evaluate interprofessional collaboration experiences in the clinical setting.

Abstract Image

注册助产士作为教师:为妇产科实习医学生拓展跨专业合作学习机会。
介绍:跨专业经验为医学生提供了接触协作医疗团队的重要机会,但医学生在临床实习期间往往缺乏这种经验。为了弥补这一不足,我们在妇产科实习中设立了由注册助产士专门负责的分娩分诊轮转。我们试图评估在这个助产士监督的合作团队中轮转的医学生的临床学习经验:在 2018 年至 2020 年期间,我们在每次规定的实习结束后,以电子方式向所有医学生发送了一份评估报告。我们的主要结果是教学质量得分,即对教学质量声明的 5 点李克特量表的同意程度。次要结果是评估所有学生在轮转结束时参加的美国国家医学考试委员会(NBME)妇产科科目考试的分数。对参加分娩分诊轮转的学生和未参加分娩分诊轮转的学生的评价和评估进行了比较。对轮转分娩分诊的学生的评价意见进行整理,以确定共同的主题:在 374 名学生中,370 人(98.9%)完成了实习结束课程评估,312 人(83.4%)完成了教学评估。67名学生(17.9%)在分娩分诊中轮转,其中52名学生(77.6%)同时完成了课程和分诊轮转评价。与所有其他轮转相比,在教学质量平均得分(3.9 ± 1.2 vs 3.8 ± 1.2,P = 0.54)或 NBME 妇产科科目考试分数方面,在产科和分娩分诊轮转的学生之间没有差异(79.9% ± 7.2% vs 80.2% ± 7.8%,P = 0.436)。教学评估中的评论强调了学生对助产士护理理念模式的接触:这项工作证明了助产士主导的真实跨专业合作体验对医学生的可行性和益处。该模式可作为如何在临床环境中实施和评估跨专业合作体验的范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信