Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis: a real-world retrospective observational study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Sishi Lin, Ji Zhang, Xiaohan You, Bo Chen, Yan Liang, Yin Zhou, Xiaokai Ding, Yinqiu Lv, Huidi Zhang, Bofeng Su, Yongheng Bai, Chaosheng Chen
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis: a real-world retrospective observational study.","authors":"Sishi Lin, Ji Zhang, Xiaohan You, Bo Chen, Yan Liang, Yin Zhou, Xiaokai Ding, Yinqiu Lv, Huidi Zhang, Bofeng Su, Yongheng Bai, Chaosheng Chen","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/kead707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the differences in efficacy and safety between lupus nephritis (LN) patients who received belimumab plus standard therapy and those who received only standard therapy in real world practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with LN at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from November 2012 to July 2023 were identified, and eligible cases were divided into two groups according to whether they received additional treatment with belimumab during the course of the disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1169 LN patients were identified from our follow-up database. In total, 112 patients receiving add-on treatment with belimumab (BLM group) and 112 control patients matched for relevant baseline characteristics were enrolled in this study. The median duration of treatment with belimumab was 13.82 [7.24, 20.29] months. Compared with the control group, the BLM group had more significant improvement in disease activity indicators such as serum albumin and complement levels, significantly lower B-cell count, immunoglobulin, and earlier first attainment of renal remission, but there was no significant improvement in renal function and kidney-related events or death during the 2-year follow-up period. In the BLM group, the treatment effect of belimumab was more prominent in patients with lower levels of proteinuria. The safety profile of belimumab treatment was favorable, with a lower incidence of respiratory tract infection in the BLM group than in the control group during the follow-up period (P = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-world study revealed that add-on treatment with belimumab provided better disease remission, and the therapeutic effect was more significant in patients with lower proteinuria levels. In addition, it had a favorable safety profile and reduced the risk of respiratory tract infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"614-622"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the differences in efficacy and safety between lupus nephritis (LN) patients who received belimumab plus standard therapy and those who received only standard therapy in real world practice.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with LN at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from November 2012 to July 2023 were identified, and eligible cases were divided into two groups according to whether they received additional treatment with belimumab during the course of the disease.

Results: A total of 1169 LN patients were identified from our follow-up database. In total, 112 patients receiving add-on treatment with belimumab (BLM group) and 112 control patients matched for relevant baseline characteristics were enrolled in this study. The median duration of treatment with belimumab was 13.82 [7.24, 20.29] months. Compared with the control group, the BLM group had more significant improvement in disease activity indicators such as serum albumin and complement levels, significantly lower B-cell count, immunoglobulin, and earlier first attainment of renal remission, but there was no significant improvement in renal function and kidney-related events or death during the 2-year follow-up period. In the BLM group, the treatment effect of belimumab was more prominent in patients with lower levels of proteinuria. The safety profile of belimumab treatment was favorable, with a lower incidence of respiratory tract infection in the BLM group than in the control group during the follow-up period (P = 0.015).

Conclusions: This real-world study revealed that add-on treatment with belimumab provided better disease remission, and the therapeutic effect was more significant in patients with lower proteinuria levels. In addition, it had a favorable safety profile and reduced the risk of respiratory tract infection.

贝利木单抗对狼疮性肾炎患者的疗效和安全性:一项真实世界的回顾性观察研究。
目的评估狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者接受贝利木单抗联合标准治疗与仅接受标准治疗在疗效和安全性方面的差异:确定2012年11月至2023年7月在温州医科大学附属第一医院确诊的狼疮性肾炎患者,并将符合条件的病例根据其在病程中是否接受了贝利木单抗的额外治疗分为两组:结果:我们的随访数据库共识别出1,169例LN患者。本研究共纳入了112名接受贝利木单抗附加治疗的患者(BLM组)和112名符合相关基线特征的对照组患者。使用贝利木单抗治疗的中位持续时间为13.82 [7.24,20.29] 个月。与对照组相比,BLM组患者的疾病活动指标(如血清白蛋白和补体水平)有更明显的改善,B细胞计数和免疫球蛋白显著降低,首次达到肾脏缓解的时间提前,但在2年的随访期间,肾功能和肾脏相关事件或死亡没有明显改善。在BLM组中,蛋白尿水平较低的患者使用贝利木单抗的治疗效果更为突出。贝利木单抗治疗的安全性良好,在随访期间,BLM组呼吸道感染的发生率低于对照组(P= 0.015):这项真实世界研究显示,加用贝利木单抗治疗能更好地缓解疾病,而且对蛋白尿水平较低的患者疗效更显著。此外,它还具有良好的安全性,降低了呼吸道感染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信