Noise annoys-But personal choice can attenuate noise effects on cardiac response reflecting effort.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14502
Johanna R Falk, Peter M Gollwitzer, Gabriele Oettingen, Guido H E Gendolla
{"title":"Noise annoys-But personal choice can attenuate noise effects on cardiac response reflecting effort.","authors":"Johanna R Falk, Peter M Gollwitzer, Gabriele Oettingen, Guido H E Gendolla","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since personal choice fosters commitment and shields action execution against potentially conflicting influences, two laboratory experiments with university students (N = 228) tested whether engaging in action by personal choice versus external assignment of task characteristics moderates the effect of irrelevant acoustic noise on cardiovascular responses reflecting effort. Participants who could personally choose the stimulus color of moderately difficult cognitive tasks were expected to be shielded against the irrelevant noise. By contrast, when the stimulus color was externally assigned, we predicted receptivity for the irrelevant noise to be high. As expected, in both experiments, participants in the assigned color condition showed stronger cardiac pre-ejection period reactivity during task performance when exposed to noise than when working in silence. On the contrary, participants who could choose the stimulus color were shielded against the noise effect on effort. These findings conceptually replicate and extend research on the action shielding effect by personal choice and hold practical implications for occupational health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since personal choice fosters commitment and shields action execution against potentially conflicting influences, two laboratory experiments with university students (N = 228) tested whether engaging in action by personal choice versus external assignment of task characteristics moderates the effect of irrelevant acoustic noise on cardiovascular responses reflecting effort. Participants who could personally choose the stimulus color of moderately difficult cognitive tasks were expected to be shielded against the irrelevant noise. By contrast, when the stimulus color was externally assigned, we predicted receptivity for the irrelevant noise to be high. As expected, in both experiments, participants in the assigned color condition showed stronger cardiac pre-ejection period reactivity during task performance when exposed to noise than when working in silence. On the contrary, participants who could choose the stimulus color were shielded against the noise effect on effort. These findings conceptually replicate and extend research on the action shielding effect by personal choice and hold practical implications for occupational health.

噪音令人烦恼--但个人选择可以减轻噪音对反映努力程度的心脏反应的影响。
由于个人选择能促进承诺并使行动执行免受潜在冲突的影响,因此以大学生(228 人)为对象进行的两项实验室实验测试了个人选择参与行动与外部分配任务特征是否能调节无关噪音对反映努力程度的心血管反应的影响。在难度适中的认知任务中,如果参与者可以亲自选择刺激物的颜色,就有望抵御无关噪声的影响。相比之下,当刺激物的颜色由外部指定时,我们预测参与者对无关噪音的接受度会很高。不出所料,在这两项实验中,指定颜色条件下的参与者在任务执行过程中受到噪音影响时比在安静环境中工作时表现出更强的心脏射血前期反应性。相反,可以选择刺激颜色的参与者则不会受到噪声对努力的影响。这些发现在概念上复制并扩展了关于个人选择的行动屏蔽效应的研究,对职业健康具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信