Challenges of treating catatonia in the community setting without access to electroconvulsive therapy.

The journal of medicine access Pub Date : 2023-12-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27550834231220504
Tyler Torrico, Shahzeb Shaheen, David Weinstein, Ranjit Padhy, Md Towhid Salam
{"title":"Challenges of treating catatonia in the community setting without access to electroconvulsive therapy.","authors":"Tyler Torrico, Shahzeb Shaheen, David Weinstein, Ranjit Padhy, Md Towhid Salam","doi":"10.1177/27550834231220504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Catatonia is a psychomotor syndrome resulting from an underlying psychiatric or medical disorder commonly observed in inpatient psychiatric units. While benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are effective treatment options, the unavailability of ECT in many community psychiatric hospitals in the United States negatively affects patient outcomes. We present a 25-year-old African American male with a psychiatric diagnosis of schizophrenia complicated by malignant catatonia who was admitted to a community psychiatric hospital. He required intensive medical stabilization with supportive management, and transfer requests to ECT-equipped hospitals were initiated. While awaiting transfer for 148 days, the patient's symptoms did not fully remit with lorazepam (even with 36 mg daily in divided doses) and other psychotropic medication trials, including antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. After nearly 5 months of inpatient stay, he was successfully transferred, received ECT treatment, and experienced rapid resolution of catatonia. After discharge, to obtain three monthly sessions of maintenance ECT, he had 5-h one-way ground transportation arranged to an out-of-county ECT-equipped facility. There was no relapse in catatonia by the 2-year follow-up. This report highlights a significant healthcare disparity when attempting to manage severe catatonia within community hospital settings without access to ECT in the United States. Alternative treatments, including antipsychotics, had minimal impact on symptoms and possibly increased morbidity in this case while awaiting ECT. Treatment at our designated safety net hospital still required referral to 14 ECT-equipped hospitals before successful transfer. This case highlights the urgent need for ECT availability in more community hospitals to treat patients with refractory psychiatric conditions, including catatonia. ECT is an essential psychiatric treatment that, for certain conditions, has no appropriate alternatives. We propose that access to ECT be considered in the determination of safety net hospital systems, with improved ability to transfer patients who are suffering from treatable life-threatening mental health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":75087,"journal":{"name":"The journal of medicine access","volume":"7 ","pages":"27550834231220504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10748610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of medicine access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27550834231220504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Catatonia is a psychomotor syndrome resulting from an underlying psychiatric or medical disorder commonly observed in inpatient psychiatric units. While benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are effective treatment options, the unavailability of ECT in many community psychiatric hospitals in the United States negatively affects patient outcomes. We present a 25-year-old African American male with a psychiatric diagnosis of schizophrenia complicated by malignant catatonia who was admitted to a community psychiatric hospital. He required intensive medical stabilization with supportive management, and transfer requests to ECT-equipped hospitals were initiated. While awaiting transfer for 148 days, the patient's symptoms did not fully remit with lorazepam (even with 36 mg daily in divided doses) and other psychotropic medication trials, including antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. After nearly 5 months of inpatient stay, he was successfully transferred, received ECT treatment, and experienced rapid resolution of catatonia. After discharge, to obtain three monthly sessions of maintenance ECT, he had 5-h one-way ground transportation arranged to an out-of-county ECT-equipped facility. There was no relapse in catatonia by the 2-year follow-up. This report highlights a significant healthcare disparity when attempting to manage severe catatonia within community hospital settings without access to ECT in the United States. Alternative treatments, including antipsychotics, had minimal impact on symptoms and possibly increased morbidity in this case while awaiting ECT. Treatment at our designated safety net hospital still required referral to 14 ECT-equipped hospitals before successful transfer. This case highlights the urgent need for ECT availability in more community hospitals to treat patients with refractory psychiatric conditions, including catatonia. ECT is an essential psychiatric treatment that, for certain conditions, has no appropriate alternatives. We propose that access to ECT be considered in the determination of safety net hospital systems, with improved ability to transfer patients who are suffering from treatable life-threatening mental health conditions.

在没有电休克疗法的社区环境中治疗紧张性精神障碍所面临的挑战。
紧张症是由潜在的精神或内科疾病引起的精神运动综合征,常见于精神病住院病房。虽然苯二氮卓类药物和电休克疗法(ECT)是有效的治疗方法,但美国许多社区精神病院都无法提供电休克疗法,这对患者的治疗效果产生了负面影响。我们介绍了一名 25 岁的非裔美国男性患者,他被诊断为精神分裂症并发恶性紧张症,住进了一家社区精神病医院。他需要强化医疗稳定和支持性管理,并开始申请转院至配备电痉挛疗法的医院。在等待转院的 148 天里,患者服用劳拉西泮(即使每天分次服用 36 毫克)和其他精神药物(包括抗精神病药物和情绪稳定剂)后,症状并未完全缓解。住院近 5 个月后,他成功转院,接受了电痉挛疗法治疗,紧张症迅速缓解。出院后,为了获得每月三次的电痉挛疗法维持治疗,他被安排到县外一家配备电痉挛疗法设备的机构接受了5小时的单程地面交通。在两年的随访中,紧张症没有复发。这份报告凸显了美国在社区医院环境下尝试治疗严重紧张性精神分裂症时存在的巨大医疗差距。包括抗精神病药物在内的替代治疗对该病例的症状影响甚微,而且可能会在等待电痉挛疗法期间增加发病率。在我们指定的安全网医院接受治疗后,仍需转诊至14家配备ECT的医院才能成功转院。本病例突出表明,迫切需要更多社区医院提供电痉挛疗法,以治疗包括紧张症在内的难治性精神病患者。电痉挛疗法是一种重要的精神病治疗方法,对于某些病症,没有其他适当的替代方法。我们建议,在确定安全网医院系统时,应考虑 ECT 的可及性,并提高转运患有可治疗的危及生命的精神疾病患者的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信