Workaholism, work engagement, and burnout among academics in Montenegro: A psychometric network approach.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sabina Osmanovic, Sofija Pajic, Ivana B Petrovic, Igor Portoghese
{"title":"Workaholism, work engagement, and burnout among academics in Montenegro: A psychometric network approach.","authors":"Sabina Osmanovic, Sofija Pajic, Ivana B Petrovic, Igor Portoghese","doi":"10.3233/WOR-230347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The academic environment is known for its high demands in research, teaching, and administration, that along with increasing publish or perish culture can lead to reduced psychological well-being and mental health issues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the associations between workaholism, work engagement, and burnout among academics in Montenegro.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional design was used to develop anonymous online survey. Data was collected from 131 participants employed as teaching and research staff at public and private universities. To measure the variables of interest we used: ultra-short Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3), the work-related burnout subscale from the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI-7) and the Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS-10). Psychometric network analysis was employed to examine the relationships among variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed two distinct clusters: the first containing the dimensions of work engagement and the second containing burnout and the dimensions of workaholism. The two clusters were connected with the dimensions of dedication - burnout having the strongest edge (-0.25 and -0.40). In the cross-sample network the strongest connection was burnout -working excessively (.35). No significant differences in network density (0.80 (12/15 edges)) and global strength (p = 0.159) in the networks of public and private universities were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results of the network centrality and the edge strength analyses suggest that the interventions focused at increasing dedication while not fostering a work environment that encourages working excessively might be the key to preventing and reducing burnout in academia across contexts of public and private universities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1081-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The academic environment is known for its high demands in research, teaching, and administration, that along with increasing publish or perish culture can lead to reduced psychological well-being and mental health issues.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the associations between workaholism, work engagement, and burnout among academics in Montenegro.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to develop anonymous online survey. Data was collected from 131 participants employed as teaching and research staff at public and private universities. To measure the variables of interest we used: ultra-short Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3), the work-related burnout subscale from the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI-7) and the Dutch Work Addiction Scale (DUWAS-10). Psychometric network analysis was employed to examine the relationships among variables.

Results: The findings revealed two distinct clusters: the first containing the dimensions of work engagement and the second containing burnout and the dimensions of workaholism. The two clusters were connected with the dimensions of dedication - burnout having the strongest edge (-0.25 and -0.40). In the cross-sample network the strongest connection was burnout -working excessively (.35). No significant differences in network density (0.80 (12/15 edges)) and global strength (p = 0.159) in the networks of public and private universities were found.

Conclusion: Results of the network centrality and the edge strength analyses suggest that the interventions focused at increasing dedication while not fostering a work environment that encourages working excessively might be the key to preventing and reducing burnout in academia across contexts of public and private universities.

黑山学术界的工作狂、工作投入和职业倦怠:心理测量网络方法。
背景众所周知,学术环境对研究、教学和行政管理的要求很高,随着出版或灭亡文化的不断增加,可能会导致心理健康和精神健康问题的减少:本研究旨在调查黑山学术界工作狂、工作投入和职业倦怠之间的关联:采用横断面设计,编制匿名在线调查问卷。我们从 131 名受雇于公立和私立大学的教学和研究人员中收集了数据。为了测量相关变量,我们使用了超短乌特勒支工作投入量表(UWES-3)、哥本哈根工作倦怠量表(CBI-7)中与工作相关的倦怠分量表和荷兰工作成瘾量表(DUWAS-10)。研究采用了心理测量网络分析来检验变量之间的关系:研究结果显示了两个不同的集群:第一个集群包含工作投入维度,第二个集群包含职业倦怠和工作狂维度。这两个聚类之间的联系以敬业度和职业倦怠的联系最为紧密(-0.25 和 -0.40)。在跨样本网络中,工作倦怠与过度工作的联系最强(0.35)。在公立大学和私立大学的网络中,网络密度(0.80(12/15 条边))和整体强度(p = 0.159)没有发现明显差异:网络中心度和边缘强度分析的结果表明,在公立和私立大学的不同背景下,干预措施的重点可能是提高敬业度,同时不营造鼓励过度工作的工作环境,这可能是预防和减少学术界职业倦怠的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信