Evaluation of the sedative effect of sublingual lorazepam versus placebo in patients underwent endoscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-12-23 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26317745231219597
Maryam Hasanzarrini, Samira Nirumandi Jahromi, Amir Mohammad Salehi, Sara Ataei, Zohreh Seyfi, Jalal Poorolajal
{"title":"Evaluation of the sedative effect of sublingual lorazepam <i>versus</i> placebo in patients underwent endoscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Maryam Hasanzarrini, Samira Nirumandi Jahromi, Amir Mohammad Salehi, Sara Ataei, Zohreh Seyfi, Jalal Poorolajal","doi":"10.1177/26317745231219597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digestive endoscopy (DE) is uncomfortable for most patients. Lorazepam is a potent benzodiazepine with anxiolytic and sedative effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to determine the sedative effect of sublingual lorazepam <i>versus</i> placebo as a premedication in patients who underwent DE.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a mono-center, double-blind, and randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A lorazepam sublingual tablet was made by researchers and physical tests were done on it, then the double-blind placebo-controlled trial was done to investigate the efficacy of 2 mg sublingually administered lorazepam as a premedication for endoscopy. Lorazepam or a placebo tablet was administered sublingually 30 min before the endoscopy. The patients, nurses, and physicians were blinded to the patient group. The depth of sedation was evaluated according to the American Society of Anesthesiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 116 patients were randomly assigned to take either lorazepam (<i>n</i> = 58) or a placebo (<i>n</i> = 58). The results of physical properties tests were acceptable according to United States Pharmacopeia. There were no statistical differences between groups regarding age and gender. In the lorazepam group, 75.8% of patients showed mild sedation, and 24.2% of patients showed no sedation. All of the patients in the placebo had no sedation (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Time of procedure (<i>p</i> < 0.001), intraoperative O<sub>2</sub> saturation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), intraoperative heart rate (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and intraoperative blood pressure (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were significantly lower in the lorazepam group. No significant or dangerous side effects were observed except a bit of giddiness and dizziness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study showed that prescription of sublingual lorazepam 25-30 min before endoscopy provided mild sedation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>IRCT201611039014N130 (05/11/2016); https://en.irct.ir/trial/9568.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"16 ","pages":"26317745231219597"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10748895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745231219597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digestive endoscopy (DE) is uncomfortable for most patients. Lorazepam is a potent benzodiazepine with anxiolytic and sedative effects.

Objective: This study aims to determine the sedative effect of sublingual lorazepam versus placebo as a premedication in patients who underwent DE.

Design: This is a mono-center, double-blind, and randomized controlled trial.

Methods: A lorazepam sublingual tablet was made by researchers and physical tests were done on it, then the double-blind placebo-controlled trial was done to investigate the efficacy of 2 mg sublingually administered lorazepam as a premedication for endoscopy. Lorazepam or a placebo tablet was administered sublingually 30 min before the endoscopy. The patients, nurses, and physicians were blinded to the patient group. The depth of sedation was evaluated according to the American Society of Anesthesiology.

Results: In all, 116 patients were randomly assigned to take either lorazepam (n = 58) or a placebo (n = 58). The results of physical properties tests were acceptable according to United States Pharmacopeia. There were no statistical differences between groups regarding age and gender. In the lorazepam group, 75.8% of patients showed mild sedation, and 24.2% of patients showed no sedation. All of the patients in the placebo had no sedation (p = 0.001). Time of procedure (p < 0.001), intraoperative O2 saturation (p < 0.001), intraoperative heart rate (p < 0.001), and intraoperative blood pressure (p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the lorazepam group. No significant or dangerous side effects were observed except a bit of giddiness and dizziness.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that prescription of sublingual lorazepam 25-30 min before endoscopy provided mild sedation.

Registration: IRCT201611039014N130 (05/11/2016); https://en.irct.ir/trial/9568.

评估舌下氯羟安定与安慰剂对内窥镜检查患者的镇静效果:双盲随机对照临床试验。
背景:消化内镜检查(DE)会让大多数患者感到不适。劳拉西泮是一种强效苯二氮卓类药物,具有抗焦虑和镇静作用:本研究旨在确定舌下含服劳拉西泮与安慰剂作为消化内镜检查前用药对患者的镇静效果:设计:这是一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验:研究人员制作了一种劳拉西泮舌下含片,并对其进行了物理测试,然后进行了双盲安慰剂对照试验,以研究2毫克劳拉西泮舌下含片作为内窥镜检查前用药的疗效。内窥镜检查前 30 分钟,舌下含服劳拉西泮或安慰剂片剂。患者、护士和医生均为盲人。镇静深度根据美国麻醉学会的标准进行评估:共有 116 名患者被随机分配服用劳拉西泮(58 人)或安慰剂(58 人)。物理性质测试结果符合美国药典标准。各组在年龄和性别方面没有统计学差异。在劳拉西泮组中,75.8% 的患者表现出轻度镇静,24.2% 的患者没有镇静。安慰剂组的所有患者均无镇静作用(p = 0.001)。手术时间(p 2 饱和度(p p p 结论:本研究结果表明,在内窥镜检查前 25-30 分钟舌下含服氯羟安定可提供轻度镇静:IRCT201611039014N130 (05/11/2016); https://en.irct.ir/trial/9568.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信