Supportive language strategies for preschool dual language learners: Associations with early language outcomes

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Keisey Fumero , Carla Wood , Beth Phillips
{"title":"Supportive language strategies for preschool dual language learners: Associations with early language outcomes","authors":"Keisey Fumero ,&nbsp;Carla Wood ,&nbsp;Beth Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To better understand the language environments of early childhood education (ECE) classrooms with dual language learners (DLLs), we examined the frequency with which adults use various language facilitation strategies, potential classroom characteristics that may predict teacher strategy use and the impact that teacher strategy use may have on DLL children's lexical and morphosyntactic skills. The study included 21 preschool classrooms and 69 children from a Latine background who spoke Spanish at home. Classroom observations were recorded at three different timepoints in one school year. A total of 14 strategies were of interest: English-General (n = 5), Spanish-General (n = 5), and DLL-Specific (n = 4) language facilitation strategies.</p><p>A between-subjects one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the frequency in which teachers were using the strategies did not differ by strategy type. Hierarchical linear models (HLM) were used to test the association between classroom characteristics and strategy use and DLL language outcomes. Results indicated that the proportion of DLLs had significant positive associations with teachers’ use of general strategies in Spanish and DLL specific language strategies. The analyses also revealed a significant negative association between teachers’ use of Spanish general language strategies and children's English lexical outcomes and positive associations between English general language strategy use and children's morphosyntactic outcomes. This study informs our understanding of adult-DLL interactions in ECE programs, the frequency in which different language facilitation strategies are used in these classrooms, and the impact that implementation of such strategies may have on DLL children's language growth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 101-110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200623001655","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To better understand the language environments of early childhood education (ECE) classrooms with dual language learners (DLLs), we examined the frequency with which adults use various language facilitation strategies, potential classroom characteristics that may predict teacher strategy use and the impact that teacher strategy use may have on DLL children's lexical and morphosyntactic skills. The study included 21 preschool classrooms and 69 children from a Latine background who spoke Spanish at home. Classroom observations were recorded at three different timepoints in one school year. A total of 14 strategies were of interest: English-General (n = 5), Spanish-General (n = 5), and DLL-Specific (n = 4) language facilitation strategies.

A between-subjects one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the frequency in which teachers were using the strategies did not differ by strategy type. Hierarchical linear models (HLM) were used to test the association between classroom characteristics and strategy use and DLL language outcomes. Results indicated that the proportion of DLLs had significant positive associations with teachers’ use of general strategies in Spanish and DLL specific language strategies. The analyses also revealed a significant negative association between teachers’ use of Spanish general language strategies and children's English lexical outcomes and positive associations between English general language strategy use and children's morphosyntactic outcomes. This study informs our understanding of adult-DLL interactions in ECE programs, the frequency in which different language facilitation strategies are used in these classrooms, and the impact that implementation of such strategies may have on DLL children's language growth.

学龄前双语学习者的辅助语言策略:与早期语言成果的关联
为了更好地了解有双语学习者(DLLs)的幼儿教育(ECE)课堂的语言环境,我们研究了成人使用各种语言促进策略的频率、可能预测教师策略使用的潜在课堂特征,以及教师策略的使用可能对双语学习者儿童的词汇和形态句法技能产生的影响。这项研究包括 21 间学前班教室和 69 名来自拉丁语系、在家讲西班牙语的儿童。在一个学年的三个不同时间点对课堂进行了观察记录。共有 14 种策略值得关注:主体间单向方差分析(ANOVA)表明,不同策略类型的教师使用策略的频率并无差异。使用层次线性模型(HLM)检验了课堂特征、策略使用和 DLL 语言成果之间的关联。结果表明,DLL 的比例与教师使用西班牙语一般策略和 DLL 特定语言策略之间存在显著的正相关关系。分析还显示,教师使用西班牙语通用语言策略与儿童的英语词法成果之间存在显著的负相关,而使用英语通用语言策略与儿童的形态句法成果之间存在正相关。这项研究有助于我们了解幼教项目中成人与 DLL 的互动、这些课堂中使用不同语言促进策略的频率,以及这些策略的实施可能对 DLL 儿童的语言成长产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信