Assessing reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Crown–Crisp experience index and its application in coal miners

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Fulin Cai, Sheng Xue, Mei Zhang, Jing Zhang, Xiufeng Chen, Yi Bao, Yaqiang Li
{"title":"Assessing reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Crown–Crisp experience index and its application in coal miners","authors":"Fulin Cai, Sheng Xue, Mei Zhang, Jing Zhang, Xiufeng Chen, Yi Bao, Yaqiang Li","doi":"10.1007/s40789-023-00641-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In China, coal miners are the primary workforce in coal mining, and among all patients with occupational diseases, 90% suffer from pneumoconiosis. Therefore, the psychological problems resulting from the dual pressures of occupational stress and the high risk of occupational diseases among coal miners are significant factors that affect the development of physical and mental health and even production safety. The Crown–Crisp Experience Index (CCEI) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses the psychological state of patients. This study aims to test reliability and validity of Chinese version of the CCEI questionnaire using factor analysis, and apply it to coal miners. We recruited a total of 900 participants from different occupational stages in coal mining, including active miners, Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis (CWP) patients, and retired miners, to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CCEI questionnaire. A questionnaire survey was conducted on three groups of 1000 individuals each, including active coal miners, retired coal miners, and pneumoconiosis patients, to determine the detection rate of psychological problems in each group. An analysis was performed for each group to explore the primary factors influencing anxiety. The exploratory factor analysis yielded six principal components that accounted for a total of 79.389% of variances. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the Chi-square freedom ratio (<i>χ</i><sup><i>2</i></sup>/d<i>f</i>) was 1.843, the root mean square error approximation was less than 0.044, and the comparative fit index was 0.938 and Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) was 0.934. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.948, and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.88. Effective questionnaires were obtained from 98.5%, 96.9%, to 91.0% of pneumoconiosis patients, active miners, and retired miners, respectively, with the incidence rates of psychological problems being 21%, 35.8%, and 13.6%, respectively. Compared with retired miners, active miners showed higher levels of psychological problems in the dimensions of depressive symptoms, free-floating anxiety and somatic symptoms, whereas pneumoconiosis patients had higher levels of psychological problems in the dimensions of phobic anxiety and somatic symptoms. This study demonstrates that the Chinese version of the CCEI is highly reliable and valid and can be used as a screening tool to measure patients' anxiety and fear levels in coal minders. Miners face distinct psychological challenges at different stages and require targeted screening and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53469,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-023-00641-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In China, coal miners are the primary workforce in coal mining, and among all patients with occupational diseases, 90% suffer from pneumoconiosis. Therefore, the psychological problems resulting from the dual pressures of occupational stress and the high risk of occupational diseases among coal miners are significant factors that affect the development of physical and mental health and even production safety. The Crown–Crisp Experience Index (CCEI) is a multidimensional questionnaire that assesses the psychological state of patients. This study aims to test reliability and validity of Chinese version of the CCEI questionnaire using factor analysis, and apply it to coal miners. We recruited a total of 900 participants from different occupational stages in coal mining, including active miners, Coal Workers’ Pneumoconiosis (CWP) patients, and retired miners, to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CCEI questionnaire. A questionnaire survey was conducted on three groups of 1000 individuals each, including active coal miners, retired coal miners, and pneumoconiosis patients, to determine the detection rate of psychological problems in each group. An analysis was performed for each group to explore the primary factors influencing anxiety. The exploratory factor analysis yielded six principal components that accounted for a total of 79.389% of variances. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the Chi-square freedom ratio (χ2/df) was 1.843, the root mean square error approximation was less than 0.044, and the comparative fit index was 0.938 and Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) was 0.934. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.948, and the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.88. Effective questionnaires were obtained from 98.5%, 96.9%, to 91.0% of pneumoconiosis patients, active miners, and retired miners, respectively, with the incidence rates of psychological problems being 21%, 35.8%, and 13.6%, respectively. Compared with retired miners, active miners showed higher levels of psychological problems in the dimensions of depressive symptoms, free-floating anxiety and somatic symptoms, whereas pneumoconiosis patients had higher levels of psychological problems in the dimensions of phobic anxiety and somatic symptoms. This study demonstrates that the Chinese version of the CCEI is highly reliable and valid and can be used as a screening tool to measure patients' anxiety and fear levels in coal minders. Miners face distinct psychological challenges at different stages and require targeted screening and interventions.

Abstract Image

评估中文版 Crown-Crisp 经验指数的信度和效度及其在煤矿工人中的应用
在我国,煤矿工人是煤矿开采的主要劳动力,在所有职业病患者中,90%患有尘肺病。因此,煤矿工人在职业压力和职业病高风险的双重压力下产生的心理问题,是影响身心健康发展乃至安全生产的重要因素。皇冠比分网-危机体验指数(CCEI)是一种评估患者心理状态的多维问卷。本研究旨在采用因子分析法检验中文版 CCEI 问卷的信度和效度,并将其应用于煤矿工人。我们招募了来自煤矿不同职业阶段的 900 名参与者,包括在职矿工、煤工尘肺病(CWP)患者和退休矿工,以评估中文版 CCEI 问卷的信度和效度。对在役煤矿工人、退休煤矿工人和尘肺病患者三组各 1000 人进行了问卷调查,以确定各组心理问题的检出率。对每个组别进行了分析,以探讨影响焦虑的主要因素。探索性因子分析得出了六个主成分,共占方差的 79.389%。确认性因素分析表明,奇偶自由度比(χ2/df)为 1.843,均方根误差近似值小于 0.044,比较拟合指数为 0.938,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)为 0.934。克朗巴赫α系数为 0.948,量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI)为 0.88。分别有98.5%、96.9%和91.0%的尘肺病患者、在职矿工和退休矿工获得了有效问卷,心理问题发生率分别为21%、35.8%和13.6%。与退休矿工相比,在职矿工在抑郁症状、自由浮动焦虑和躯体症状方面的心理问题水平较高,而尘肺病患者在恐惧焦虑和躯体症状方面的心理问题水平较高。本研究表明,中文版 CCEI 具有高度的可靠性和有效性,可作为筛查工具用于测量煤矿工人患者的焦虑和恐惧水平。矿工在不同阶段面临不同的心理挑战,需要有针对性的筛查和干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
8.40%
发文量
678
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal that focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development. It serves as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues in the field. The journal covers a range of topics including coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology. It also covers coal mining theory, technology, and engineering, as well as coal processing, utilization, and conversion. Additionally, the journal explores coal mining environment and reclamation, along with related aspects. The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs. This means that authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信