Beyond the Rainbow? An Intersectional Analysis of the Vulnerabilities faced by LGBTIQ+ Asylum-Seekers

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Denise Venturi
{"title":"Beyond the Rainbow? An Intersectional Analysis of the Vulnerabilities faced by LGBTIQ+ Asylum-Seekers","authors":"Denise Venturi","doi":"10.1163/15718166-12340164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">SOGIESC</span>) are often considered among the main personal characteristics which are likely to give rise to special procedural and reception needs, often resulting in labelling lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex and queer (<span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">LGBTIQ</span>+) asylum-seekers and refugees as “vulnerable”. However, <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">SOGIESC</span> issues should not be analysed in isolation, as there are various factors that can impact on one’s experience in the country of origin and throughout the asylum procedure. This paper shows the added value of mobilizing intersectionality in the assessment of <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">SOGIESC</span> asylum claims. By analysing soft law instruments, legislation and case law and taking Italy as a case study, this paper shows that intersectionality can be a useful analytical tool that can support a better understanding of how <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">LGBTIQ</span>+ asylum-seekers experience their “vulnerabilities”, as well as sustain State practices that address their protection needs in the asylum domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":51819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Migration and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Migration and Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12340164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) are often considered among the main personal characteristics which are likely to give rise to special procedural and reception needs, often resulting in labelling lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ+) asylum-seekers and refugees as “vulnerable”. However, SOGIESC issues should not be analysed in isolation, as there are various factors that can impact on one’s experience in the country of origin and throughout the asylum procedure. This paper shows the added value of mobilizing intersectionality in the assessment of SOGIESC asylum claims. By analysing soft law instruments, legislation and case law and taking Italy as a case study, this paper shows that intersectionality can be a useful analytical tool that can support a better understanding of how LGBTIQ+ asylum-seekers experience their “vulnerabilities”, as well as sustain State practices that address their protection needs in the asylum domain.

超越彩虹?对 LGBTIQ+ 寻求庇护者所面临的脆弱性的交叉分析
性取向、性别认同、性别表达和性特征(SOGIESC)通常被认为是可能引起特殊程序和接待需求的主要个人特征之一,这往往导致将女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、双性人和同性恋(LGBTIQ+)寻求庇护者和难民称为 "弱势群体"。然而,不应孤立地分析社会性别、经济和文化问题,因为有各种因素会影响一个人在原籍国和整个庇护程序中的经历。本文展示了在评估性别平等与跨性别庇护申请时调动交叉性的附加价值。通过分析软性法律文书、立法和判例法,并以意大利为案例研究,本文表明交叉性可以成为一种有用的分析工具,有助于更好地理解寻求庇护的 LGBTIQ+ 是如何经历其 "脆弱性 "的,以及维持国家在庇护领域满足其保护需求的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Migration and Law is a quarterly journal on migration law and policy with specific emphasis on the European Union, the Council of Europe and migration activities within the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe. This journal differs from other migration journals by focusing on both the law and policy within the field of migration, as opposed to examining immigration and migration policies from a wholly sociological perspective. The Journal is the initiative of the Centre for Migration Law of the University of Nijmegen, in co-operation with the Brussels-based Migration Policy Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信