S41 Case Report: Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease Mistaken for Crohn’s Disease

E. Picker, Reem Jan, Christopher R. Weber, L. Yassan, John Hart, D. T. Rubin
{"title":"S41 Case Report: Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease Mistaken for Crohn’s Disease","authors":"E. Picker, Reem Jan, Christopher R. Weber, L. Yassan, John Hart, D. T. Rubin","doi":"10.14309/01.ajg.0000995904.06419.f0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and adalimumab (0.003), and ustekinumab/vedolizumab (0.002). We also looked at outcomes of the patients who had HF as an adverse event due to biologics, including hospitalizations and it showed it was highest with adalimumab,followed by In fl iximab and vedolizumab. The other outcome we looked at was mortality for patients who had HF with biologics, it was highest in patients who had used adalimumab, followed by In fl iximab and ustekinumab. Conclusions: Our study adds further to the literature regarding biologics adverse events, speci fi cally heart failure. Tofacitinib had the highest ratio of heart failure among all adverse e ff ects, followed by the already-established In fl iximab. All other newer biologics had a relatively lower ratio. Despite tofacitinibhavingthehighestratioforheartfailure,wecannotattributesigni fi cancetothisduetothis drug having only one reported case compared to other drugs. Furthermore, we can conclude that newer biologics have a relatively very small ratio for the risk of heart failure compared to In fl iximab. Further data is needed for the newer biologics.","PeriodicalId":188050,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"65 10","pages":"S11 - S12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0000995904.06419.f0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

and adalimumab (0.003), and ustekinumab/vedolizumab (0.002). We also looked at outcomes of the patients who had HF as an adverse event due to biologics, including hospitalizations and it showed it was highest with adalimumab,followed by In fl iximab and vedolizumab. The other outcome we looked at was mortality for patients who had HF with biologics, it was highest in patients who had used adalimumab, followed by In fl iximab and ustekinumab. Conclusions: Our study adds further to the literature regarding biologics adverse events, speci fi cally heart failure. Tofacitinib had the highest ratio of heart failure among all adverse e ff ects, followed by the already-established In fl iximab. All other newer biologics had a relatively lower ratio. Despite tofacitinibhavingthehighestratioforheartfailure,wecannotattributesigni fi cancetothisduetothis drug having only one reported case compared to other drugs. Furthermore, we can conclude that newer biologics have a relatively very small ratio for the risk of heart failure compared to In fl iximab. Further data is needed for the newer biologics.
S41 病例报告:免疫球蛋白 G4 相关疾病被误认为克罗恩病
和阿达木单抗(0.003),以及ustekinumab/vedolizumab(0.002)。我们还研究了因使用生物制剂而导致心房颤动不良事件的患者的治疗效果,包括住院治疗,结果显示阿达木单抗的治疗效果最好,其次是In fl iximab和vedolizumab。我们研究的另一项结果是使用生物制剂的高血脂患者的死亡率,使用阿达木单抗的患者死亡率最高,其次是In fl iximab和ustekinumab。结论我们的研究进一步丰富了有关生物制剂不良事件(尤其是心力衰竭)的文献。在所有不良反应中,托法替尼发生心力衰竭的比例最高,其次是已经上市的英利昔单抗。所有其他较新的生物制剂的比例相对较低。尽管法替尼的心脏衰竭发生率最高,但与其他药物相比,我们不能将其归因于该药仅有一例报道。此外,我们可以得出结论,与英利昔单抗相比,新型生物制剂的心衰风险比相对较小。较新的生物制剂还需要更多的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信