Leverages of social restraint of the UOC-MP in modern realities

Volodymyr Tokman
{"title":"Leverages of social restraint of the UOC-MP in modern realities","authors":"Volodymyr Tokman","doi":"10.52761/2522-1558.2023.18.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of the restrictive influence of the UOC-MP on Ukrainian society began to be actively discussed after the annexation of Crimea by Russia and the occupation of parts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions in 2014.\n\nAt that time, the basic essence of the UOC-MP as an ideological and ideological agent of the political regime associated with the Kremlin became clear. The leadership and the vast majority of the bishops of the pro-Moscow church structure did not condemn Russian aggression even then, continued to maintain close ties with the Moscow Patriarchate and demonstrate loyalty to the political leadership of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":371962,"journal":{"name":"Good Parson: scientific bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk Academy of John Chrysostom. Theology. Philosophy. History","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Good Parson: scientific bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk Academy of John Chrysostom. Theology. Philosophy. History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52761/2522-1558.2023.18.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of the restrictive influence of the UOC-MP on Ukrainian society began to be actively discussed after the annexation of Crimea by Russia and the occupation of parts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions in 2014. At that time, the basic essence of the UOC-MP as an ideological and ideological agent of the political regime associated with the Kremlin became clear. The leadership and the vast majority of the bishops of the pro-Moscow church structure did not condemn Russian aggression even then, continued to maintain close ties with the Moscow Patriarchate and demonstrate loyalty to the political leadership of the Russian Federation.
在现代现实中利用统一奥林匹克运动党的社会约束机制
2014年俄罗斯吞并克里米亚并占领顿涅茨克州和卢甘斯克州部分地区后,乌克兰教会-人民党对乌克兰社会的限制性影响问题开始被积极讨论。当时,乌克兰教会-人民党作为与克里姆林宫有关联的政治体制的意识形态和意识形态代理人的基本本质变得清晰起来。即使在那时,亲莫斯科教会结构的领导层和绝大多数主教也没有谴责俄罗斯的侵略,而是继续与莫斯科牧首辖区保持密切联系,并对俄罗斯联邦的政治领导层表示忠诚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信