[Experimental studies on augmentation of the mandibular region with proplast and lyophilized homogenous cartilage].

Shika gakuho. Dental science reports Pub Date : 1989-01-01
S Hanawa
{"title":"[Experimental studies on augmentation of the mandibular region with proplast and lyophilized homogenous cartilage].","authors":"S Hanawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proplast I, Proplast II and freeze-dried homogenous cartilage (1 x 2 x 5 mm) were implanted under and over the rabbit mandibular periosteum. Histological observations and contact microradiography (CMR) were performed to investigate the healing process in the surgical sites from 1 to 24 weeks after the operation. In addition, microangiography (MA) was carried out to investigate changes of vascularization in the groups in which Proplast implants were made. Results 1. Proplast implantation group 1) In the supraperiosteal placement group, CMR revealed no new bone formation around or inside the Proplast and no morphological changes of the host bone in contact with the Proplast. In the subperiosteal placement group, from the early postoperative stage, new bone formation occurred from the host bone beside the Proplast. New bone penetrated the Proplast from the new bone region and from the host bone in contact with the Proplast. In 6 months after the operation, Almost all Proplast pores were filled with new bone. From a comparatively early postoperative stage, resorption fossae appeared in the host bone surface. In addition, Haversian canals inside the host bone enlarged and the host bone cortex gradually grew thinner. No differences in new bone volume or host bone changes were noticed between the Proplast I and Proplast II groups. 2) In the supraperiosteal placement group, granulation tissue proliferation with slight round cell infiltration was observed around and inside the Proplast at an early stage. In 2 weeks after the operation, blood clots disappeared from the Proplast, in the center of which granulation tissue proliferated. Thereafter, granulation tissue was gradually transformed into fibrous tissue, although no new bone was observed in any region. Change almost never occurred in the host bone cortex, but slight swelling occurred in the periosteum in contact with the Proplast after 1 week. 3) In the subperiosteal placement group, swelling and slight round cell infiltration were observed in the periosteum covering the Proplast at an early postoperative stage. But, after 4 months, the periosteum had returned to normal condition. Beside and inside the Proplast, rapid granulation tissue proliferation and new bone formation were observed. New bone formation was observed beside the host bone, but not beside the periosteum. For a comparatively long time, resorbed fossae in the host bone surface and enlarged Haversian canals persisted. Host bone width gradually decreased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76540,"journal":{"name":"Shika gakuho. Dental science reports","volume":"89 1","pages":"94-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shika gakuho. Dental science reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proplast I, Proplast II and freeze-dried homogenous cartilage (1 x 2 x 5 mm) were implanted under and over the rabbit mandibular periosteum. Histological observations and contact microradiography (CMR) were performed to investigate the healing process in the surgical sites from 1 to 24 weeks after the operation. In addition, microangiography (MA) was carried out to investigate changes of vascularization in the groups in which Proplast implants were made. Results 1. Proplast implantation group 1) In the supraperiosteal placement group, CMR revealed no new bone formation around or inside the Proplast and no morphological changes of the host bone in contact with the Proplast. In the subperiosteal placement group, from the early postoperative stage, new bone formation occurred from the host bone beside the Proplast. New bone penetrated the Proplast from the new bone region and from the host bone in contact with the Proplast. In 6 months after the operation, Almost all Proplast pores were filled with new bone. From a comparatively early postoperative stage, resorption fossae appeared in the host bone surface. In addition, Haversian canals inside the host bone enlarged and the host bone cortex gradually grew thinner. No differences in new bone volume or host bone changes were noticed between the Proplast I and Proplast II groups. 2) In the supraperiosteal placement group, granulation tissue proliferation with slight round cell infiltration was observed around and inside the Proplast at an early stage. In 2 weeks after the operation, blood clots disappeared from the Proplast, in the center of which granulation tissue proliferated. Thereafter, granulation tissue was gradually transformed into fibrous tissue, although no new bone was observed in any region. Change almost never occurred in the host bone cortex, but slight swelling occurred in the periosteum in contact with the Proplast after 1 week. 3) In the subperiosteal placement group, swelling and slight round cell infiltration were observed in the periosteum covering the Proplast at an early postoperative stage. But, after 4 months, the periosteum had returned to normal condition. Beside and inside the Proplast, rapid granulation tissue proliferation and new bone formation were observed. New bone formation was observed beside the host bone, but not beside the periosteum. For a comparatively long time, resorbed fossae in the host bone surface and enlarged Haversian canals persisted. Host bone width gradually decreased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[前质体和冻干均质软骨对下颌骨区域增强的实验研究]。
将Proplast I、Proplast II和冷冻干燥的均质软骨(1 x 2 x 5 mm)分别植入兔下颌骨膜下方和上方。术后1 ~ 24周采用组织学观察和接触显微放射摄影(CMR)观察手术部位的愈合情况。此外,通过微血管造影(MA)观察Proplast植入组血管化的变化。结果1。1)骨膜上放置组CMR显示Proplast周围和内部未形成新骨,与Proplast接触的宿主骨未发生形态学改变。在骨膜下放置组,从术后早期开始,Proplast旁边的宿主骨出现新骨形成。新骨从新骨区域和与Proplast接触的宿主骨穿透Proplast。术后6个月,Proplast孔内几乎全部填充新骨。在相对较早的术后阶段,宿主骨表面出现了吸收窝。宿主骨内哈弗氏管增大,宿主骨皮质逐渐变薄。Proplast I组和Proplast II组在新骨体积和宿主骨变化方面没有差异。2)在骨膜上放置组,Proplast周围和内部早期可见肉芽组织增生,有少量圆形细胞浸润。术后2周,Proplast血凝块消失,中心肉芽组织增生。此后,肉芽组织逐渐转化为纤维组织,尽管在任何区域均未观察到新骨。宿主骨皮质几乎未发生变化,但1周后与Proplast接触的骨膜出现轻微肿胀。3)骨膜下放置组术后早期覆盖Proplast的骨膜肿胀,有轻微圆形细胞浸润。但4个月后,骨膜恢复正常。propro质体旁、内肉芽组织增生迅速,新生骨形成。宿主骨旁可见新骨形成,而骨膜旁未见新骨形成。在相当长的时间内,宿主骨表面的吸收窝和扩大的哈弗氏管持续存在。宿主骨宽度逐渐减小。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信