Role of Bacterial and Viral Infections and Co-Infections in Miscarriages

Q4 Medicine
K. Mesechkova, A. Kavrakova, E. Todorova, B. Georgieva, I. Sigridov, V. Mitev, A. Todorova
{"title":"Role of Bacterial and Viral Infections and Co-Infections in Miscarriages","authors":"K. Mesechkova, A. Kavrakova, E. Todorova, B. Georgieva, I. Sigridov, V. Mitev, A. Todorova","doi":"10.2478/amb-2023-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim To investigate the potential role of the following bacterial/viral panel (Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum/parvum, Mycomplasma hominis/genitalium, Gardnerella vaginalis, HSV1/2, EBV, CMV, VZV, HHV6, HHV7, HHV8) as causative factors for miscarriages in women by testing endometrial biopsies. Anaerobic and aerobic microorganisms causing dysbiosis and endometrial bacterial colonization by unbalanced growth were additionally tested. Materials and methods In total, 65 patients with a history of early and late miscarriages were analyzed. DNA extractions, real-time qPCR, agarose gel-electrophoresis were applied. Comparative analysis of the current with previously obtained data on the described panel in menstrual tissue samples was performed. Results In 64,6% of all tested endometrial biopsies bacterial and/or viral pathogens were detected. In 49,23% of all tested samples we found bacterial, while in 15,3% – viral pathogens. These results are similar to our previous data on menstrual tissue samples of infertile women – 61,1% infected, as 48,8% had bacterial and 22,2% had viral pathogens. Gardnerella vaginalis and Ureaplasma parvum were detected in 31,25% and 3,12% of all bacterial infected endometrial biopsies, significantly lower in comparison to the estimated rate of 69,31% and 61,36% on menstrual tissue. Anaerobic and aerobic dysbiosis were detected in 53,33% and 27% of the bacterial infected endometrial samples. In 13,33% a dysbiosis with a mixed etiology was found, while in 7% a dysbiotic condition with a totally absent findings of targeted bacteria and Lactobacillus was observed. EBV, CMV, HHV6 and HHV7 were detected in 30%, 30%, 20% and 20% of the positive for viral factors endometrial biopsies and in 40%, 7,5%, 10% and 42,5% in menstrual tissue samples. In the current study 62,5% bacterial co-infection and 12,5% bacterial/viral co-infection variants were found. Infections with the rest of the target pathogens were not detected in the endometrial biopsies. In contrast to the endometrial biopsy results, Mycomplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and HSV2 were detected in our previous research on menstrual tissue samples. Conclusions Our research suggests a possible dysbiosis as a consequence of bacterial/viral endometrial colonization, associated with miscarriages. We prove that menstrual tissue, containing parts of the functional endometrial layer, is a reliable and accurate noninvasive sample for infectious screening of the upper genital tract.","PeriodicalId":35746,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Bulgarica","volume":"20 10","pages":"13 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Bulgarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2023-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aim To investigate the potential role of the following bacterial/viral panel (Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum/parvum, Mycomplasma hominis/genitalium, Gardnerella vaginalis, HSV1/2, EBV, CMV, VZV, HHV6, HHV7, HHV8) as causative factors for miscarriages in women by testing endometrial biopsies. Anaerobic and aerobic microorganisms causing dysbiosis and endometrial bacterial colonization by unbalanced growth were additionally tested. Materials and methods In total, 65 patients with a history of early and late miscarriages were analyzed. DNA extractions, real-time qPCR, agarose gel-electrophoresis were applied. Comparative analysis of the current with previously obtained data on the described panel in menstrual tissue samples was performed. Results In 64,6% of all tested endometrial biopsies bacterial and/or viral pathogens were detected. In 49,23% of all tested samples we found bacterial, while in 15,3% – viral pathogens. These results are similar to our previous data on menstrual tissue samples of infertile women – 61,1% infected, as 48,8% had bacterial and 22,2% had viral pathogens. Gardnerella vaginalis and Ureaplasma parvum were detected in 31,25% and 3,12% of all bacterial infected endometrial biopsies, significantly lower in comparison to the estimated rate of 69,31% and 61,36% on menstrual tissue. Anaerobic and aerobic dysbiosis were detected in 53,33% and 27% of the bacterial infected endometrial samples. In 13,33% a dysbiosis with a mixed etiology was found, while in 7% a dysbiotic condition with a totally absent findings of targeted bacteria and Lactobacillus was observed. EBV, CMV, HHV6 and HHV7 were detected in 30%, 30%, 20% and 20% of the positive for viral factors endometrial biopsies and in 40%, 7,5%, 10% and 42,5% in menstrual tissue samples. In the current study 62,5% bacterial co-infection and 12,5% bacterial/viral co-infection variants were found. Infections with the rest of the target pathogens were not detected in the endometrial biopsies. In contrast to the endometrial biopsy results, Mycomplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and HSV2 were detected in our previous research on menstrual tissue samples. Conclusions Our research suggests a possible dysbiosis as a consequence of bacterial/viral endometrial colonization, associated with miscarriages. We prove that menstrual tissue, containing parts of the functional endometrial layer, is a reliable and accurate noninvasive sample for infectious screening of the upper genital tract.
细菌和病毒感染及合并感染在流产中的作用
摘要 目的 通过检测子宫内膜活检组织,研究以下细菌/病毒组合(沙眼衣原体、解脲支原体/杆状病毒、人型支原体/生殖器支原体、阴道加德纳菌、HSV1/2、EBV、CMV、VZV、HHV6、HHV7、HHV8)作为妇女流产致病因素的潜在作用。此外,还检测了导致菌群失调和子宫内膜细菌定植生长不平衡的厌氧和需氧微生物。材料和方法 共对 65 名有早期和晚期流产史的患者进行了分析。采用了 DNA 提取、实时 qPCR、琼脂糖凝胶电泳等方法。对当前数据与之前获得的月经组织样本中的描述面板数据进行了比较分析。结果 在所有检测的子宫内膜活检样本中,64.6% 检测到细菌和/或病毒病原体。在 49.23% 的检测样本中,我们发现了细菌病原体,而在 15.3% 的样本中,我们发现了病毒病原体。这些结果与我们之前对不孕妇女月经组织样本的检测结果类似--61.1%的样本受到感染,其中48.8%带有细菌病原体,22.2%带有病毒病原体。在所有受细菌感染的子宫内膜活检样本中,分别有 31.25% 和 3.12% 检测到阴道加德纳菌和副溶脲原体,与月经组织样本中估计的 69.31% 和 61.36% 的感染率相比明显偏低。在 53.33% 和 27% 受细菌感染的子宫内膜样本中发现了厌氧和需氧菌群失调。在 13.33% 的样本中发现了混合病因的菌群失调,而在 7% 的样本中则发现了目标菌和乳酸杆菌完全缺失的菌群失调状况。在病毒因素阳性的子宫内膜活检样本中,分别有 30%、30%、20% 和 20%检测到 EBV、CMV、HHV6 和 HHV7;在月经组织样本中,分别有 40%、7.5%、10% 和 42.5%检测到 EBV、CMV、HHV6 和 HHV7。在本次研究中,发现了 62.5%的细菌合并感染和 12.5%的细菌/病毒合并感染变体。子宫内膜活检样本中未发现其他目标病原体感染。与子宫内膜活检结果不同的是,在我们之前对月经组织样本的研究中检测到了人型霉浆菌、尿解脲原体和 HSV2。结论 我们的研究表明,细菌/病毒在子宫内膜定植可能导致菌群失调,并与流产有关。我们证明,含有部分功能性子宫内膜层的月经组织是用于上生殖道感染筛查的可靠、准确的非侵入性样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medica Bulgarica
Acta Medica Bulgarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: About 30 years ago - in 1973, on the initiative of the Publishing House „Medicine and Physical Culture", namely its former director Mr. Traian Ivanov, the Ministry of Health set up and accepted to subsidize a new medical magazine that was to be published only in the English language and had to reflect the status and the achievements of the Bulgarian medical science. Thus the language barrier was overcome and stable relations were established with the international medical society, large libraries, and university centers. The famous internationally known scientist professor Assen A. Hadjiolov was elected edition-in-chief by the first editorial staff and the magazine was named Acta Medica Bulgarica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信