Effect of the case-based learning method combined with virtual reality simulation technology on midwifery laboratory courses: A quasi-experimental study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Lingyun Zhao, Xiaohong Dai, Siyu Chen
{"title":"Effect of the case-based learning method combined with virtual reality simulation technology on midwifery laboratory courses: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Lingyun Zhao,&nbsp;Xiaohong Dai,&nbsp;Siyu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of case-based learning (CBL) method with virtual reality (VR) simulation technology (CBL-VR) on midwifery laboratory courses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A quasi-experimental design was employed. A total of 135 midwifery students were recruited from Nursing College of Guilin Medical University in China from September 2020 to January 2022. Intervention group recruited students from the Class of 2019 (<em>n</em> = 59) and control group recruited students from the Class of 2018 (<em>n</em> = 76). The intervention group students received the CBL-VR method based on traditional laboratory teaching, the contents of course included four sections: eutocia (6 class hours), dystocia (6 class hours), umbilical cord prolapse (2 class hours), and neonatal asphyxia and resuscitation (4 class hours), 40 min per class hour. The control group students received the traditional laboratory teaching. Students’ academic performance, Self-Directed Learning (SDL) Ability Questionnaire, and the education satisfaction questionnaire were used to evaluate the teaching efficacy between two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After intervention, the intervention group students achieved higher scores than the control group in individual operation ability (90.88 ± 2.14 vs. 89.24 ± 3.15), team operation ability (90.97 ± 2.33 vs. 81.28 ± 5.45), and midwifery case analysis ability (88.64 ± 3.19 vs. 86.70 ± 2.56) (<em>P</em> <0.01). Prior to the implementation of the course, there was no difference in the SDL ability scores between the two groups of students (<em>P</em> > 0.05). However, following the course intervention, the SDL ability scores of the intervention group were higher than those of the control group (94.78 ± 6.59 vs. 88.12 ± 8.36), and the scores in all dimensions of the intervention group were also higher (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Additionally, more than 94% of the students indicated that CBL-VR method developed comprehensive abilities, including independent-study enthusiasm, independent thinking, collaboration, and communication.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Using the CBL-VR method in midwifery lab courses improved students’ course performance, SDL ability, and comprehensive ability. Students highly recognized the effectiveness of this approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001515/pdfft?md5=26ab676783483aca7c526dcdaa73077e&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013223001515-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of case-based learning (CBL) method with virtual reality (VR) simulation technology (CBL-VR) on midwifery laboratory courses.

Methods

A quasi-experimental design was employed. A total of 135 midwifery students were recruited from Nursing College of Guilin Medical University in China from September 2020 to January 2022. Intervention group recruited students from the Class of 2019 (n = 59) and control group recruited students from the Class of 2018 (n = 76). The intervention group students received the CBL-VR method based on traditional laboratory teaching, the contents of course included four sections: eutocia (6 class hours), dystocia (6 class hours), umbilical cord prolapse (2 class hours), and neonatal asphyxia and resuscitation (4 class hours), 40 min per class hour. The control group students received the traditional laboratory teaching. Students’ academic performance, Self-Directed Learning (SDL) Ability Questionnaire, and the education satisfaction questionnaire were used to evaluate the teaching efficacy between two groups.

Results

After intervention, the intervention group students achieved higher scores than the control group in individual operation ability (90.88 ± 2.14 vs. 89.24 ± 3.15), team operation ability (90.97 ± 2.33 vs. 81.28 ± 5.45), and midwifery case analysis ability (88.64 ± 3.19 vs. 86.70 ± 2.56) (P <0.01). Prior to the implementation of the course, there was no difference in the SDL ability scores between the two groups of students (P > 0.05). However, following the course intervention, the SDL ability scores of the intervention group were higher than those of the control group (94.78 ± 6.59 vs. 88.12 ± 8.36), and the scores in all dimensions of the intervention group were also higher (P < 0.05). Additionally, more than 94% of the students indicated that CBL-VR method developed comprehensive abilities, including independent-study enthusiasm, independent thinking, collaboration, and communication.

Conclusion

Using the CBL-VR method in midwifery lab courses improved students’ course performance, SDL ability, and comprehensive ability. Students highly recognized the effectiveness of this approach.

基于案例的学习方法与虚拟现实模拟技术相结合对助产实验课程的影响:准实验研究
目的 本研究旨在评估基于案例的学习(CBL)方法与虚拟现实(VR)模拟技术(CBL-VR)对助产实验课程的影响。2020年9月至2022年1月,桂林医学院护理学院共招收了135名助产专业学生。干预组招收2019级学生(n=59),对照组招收2018级学生(n=76)。干预组学生接受基于传统实验教学的CBL-VR教学法,课程内容包括优生优育(6课时)、难产(6课时)、脐带脱垂(2课时)、新生儿窒息与复苏(4课时)四部分,每课时40分钟。对照组学生接受传统的实验教学。采用学生学业成绩、自主学习能力问卷和教学满意度问卷对两组学生的教学效果进行评价。结果干预后,干预组学生的个人操作能力(90.88±2.14 vs. 89.24±3.15)分、团队操作能力(90.97±2.33 vs. 81.28±5.45)分、助产案例分析能力(88.64±3.19 vs. 86.70±2.56)分均高于对照组(P<0.01)。课程实施前,两组学生的 SDL 能力得分没有差异(P > 0.05)。但在课程干预后,干预组的 SDL 能力得分高于对照组(94.78 ± 6.59 vs. 88.12 ± 8.36),干预组在各维度的得分也高于对照组(P > 0.05)。此外,94%以上的学生表示CBL-VR教学法培养了他们的综合能力,包括自主学习热情、独立思考能力、协作能力和沟通能力。学生高度认可这种方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信