Neurological Underpinnings of Psychological Factors Distinguishing Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder From Misophonia

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Simona Iskander, U. Barahmand, Monica Soni, Ravinder Kaur, Dylan Arnero
{"title":"Neurological Underpinnings of Psychological Factors Distinguishing Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder From Misophonia","authors":"Simona Iskander, U. Barahmand, Monica Soni, Ravinder Kaur, Dylan Arnero","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20231106-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Several studies have suggested that misophonia should be categorized as an obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) due to similar neural manifestations, such as impairments in limbic structures, and psychological features, such as perfectionism and disgust sensitivity. However, the two disorders may differ in the domains of disgust sensitivity. In OCD, the domain of pathogen disgust has been studied extensively as per the contamination subtype. In misophonia, pathogen disgust has not been reported. We hypothesized that moral disgust may better characterize individuals with misophonia, as studies indicate that people with misophonia view their triggers as morally unacceptable. Furthermore, neuroimaging has shown anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activation particularly during exposure to misophonic triggers, which is an area associated with moral assessment of stimuli. Another psychological factor that may point to the two disorders being discrete is intolerance of uncertainty (IU), an aversion to undetermined events. IU has been well documented in OCD: It has been found to be positively associated with striatal volume and dysfunction in the ACC—both of which are common findings in OCD. We expected people with misophonia not to exhibit IU since they experience distress in response to specific triggers and, unlike individuals with OCD, do not experience preemptive anxiety. Multivariate logistic regression analysis run on survey-gathered data revealed IU as a significant predictor of OCD symptoms and moral disgust as a significant predictor of misophonia. Consistent with our hypotheses, our findings suggest that IU and moral disgust and the associated neural underpinnings differentiate misophonia from OCD.\n \n [\n Psychiatr Ann\n . 2023;53(12):570–580.]\n \n","PeriodicalId":20917,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Annals","volume":"289 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Annals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20231106-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have suggested that misophonia should be categorized as an obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) due to similar neural manifestations, such as impairments in limbic structures, and psychological features, such as perfectionism and disgust sensitivity. However, the two disorders may differ in the domains of disgust sensitivity. In OCD, the domain of pathogen disgust has been studied extensively as per the contamination subtype. In misophonia, pathogen disgust has not been reported. We hypothesized that moral disgust may better characterize individuals with misophonia, as studies indicate that people with misophonia view their triggers as morally unacceptable. Furthermore, neuroimaging has shown anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activation particularly during exposure to misophonic triggers, which is an area associated with moral assessment of stimuli. Another psychological factor that may point to the two disorders being discrete is intolerance of uncertainty (IU), an aversion to undetermined events. IU has been well documented in OCD: It has been found to be positively associated with striatal volume and dysfunction in the ACC—both of which are common findings in OCD. We expected people with misophonia not to exhibit IU since they experience distress in response to specific triggers and, unlike individuals with OCD, do not experience preemptive anxiety. Multivariate logistic regression analysis run on survey-gathered data revealed IU as a significant predictor of OCD symptoms and moral disgust as a significant predictor of misophonia. Consistent with our hypotheses, our findings suggest that IU and moral disgust and the associated neural underpinnings differentiate misophonia from OCD. [ Psychiatr Ann . 2023;53(12):570–580.]
区分强迫症和失音症的心理因素的神经学基础
一些研究认为,由于存在类似的神经表现(如边缘结构受损)和心理特征(如完美主义和厌恶敏感性),厌恶症应被归类为强迫症(OCD)。然而,这两种疾病在厌恶敏感领域可能有所不同。在强迫症中,病原体厌恶领域已根据污染亚型进行了广泛研究。在厌恶症中,病原体厌恶尚未见报道。我们推测,道德厌恶可能会更好地描述厌食症患者的特征,因为研究表明厌食症患者认为他们的诱因在道德上是不可接受的。此外,神经影像学研究表明,前扣带回皮层(ACC)在接触误听诱因时会被激活,而这一区域与刺激物的道德评估有关。另一个可能导致这两种疾病相互分离的心理因素是对不确定性的不容忍(IU),即对不确定事件的厌恶。IU 在强迫症中得到了充分的证实:它与纹状体体积和 ACC 功能障碍呈正相关,而这两者都是强迫症的常见症状。我们预计失音症患者不会表现出 IU,因为他们会对特定的触发因素产生困扰,而且与强迫症患者不同,他们不会出现先发制人的焦虑。对调查收集的数据进行的多变量逻辑回归分析表明,IU 是强迫症症状的重要预测因素,而道德厌恶则是厌恶症的重要预测因素。与我们的假设一致,我们的研究结果表明,IU 和道德厌恶以及相关的神经基础将厌食症与强迫症区分开来。 [精神病学年鉴》,2023 年;53(12):570-580。]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Annals
Psychiatric Annals PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信