Nurses’ engagement in antimicrobial stewardship and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Huiyu Nie , Liqing Yue , Huan Peng , Jinping Zhou , Bingyu Li , Ziwei Cao
{"title":"Nurses’ engagement in antimicrobial stewardship and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Huiyu Nie ,&nbsp;Liqing Yue ,&nbsp;Huan Peng ,&nbsp;Jinping Zhou ,&nbsp;Bingyu Li ,&nbsp;Ziwei Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the level and influencing factors of nurses’ antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) engagement in China based on the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior (COM-B) theory, providing valuable insights for developing effective strategies to improve nursing quality in AMS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted in 17 tertiary hospitals in Hunan, China, from November 2021 to January 2022. A total of 4,514 nurses were selected. The Nurse AMS Engagement Questionnaire (NAEQ), developed using the COM-B theory, was used for evaluation. The questionnaire included capability (14 items), opportunity (7 items), motivation (6 items), and behavior (12 items) four dimensions, 39 items.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The total NAEQ score was 155.08 ± 27.12, indicating a moderate level. The score of the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior dimensions were 52.33 ± 13.48, 28.64 ± 5.76, 24.57 ± 4.57 and 49.53 ± 8.83, respectively. Significant differences in nurses’ AMS engagement were based on professional titles, whether working as a part-time infection control nurse, whether knowing the AMS teams and the defined daily doses of antibiotics, department type, the deployment of clinical pharmacists, and frequency of antimicrobial training and physician-nurse joint rounds (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Nurses with junior titles had higher scores on the NAEQ than nurses with intermediate titles (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Nurses who worked as part-time infection control nurses, knew the AMS team, and the defined daily doses of antibiotics had higher NAEQ scores than those who didn’t (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Nurses working in the ICU and infectious disease department had lower NAEQ scores than those in other departments, such as the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) department (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Nurses who had clinical pharmacists deployed in their department had higher NAEQ scores than those without or unclear deployment (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Furthermore, nurses who received more frequent antimicrobial training and participated in physician-nurse joint rounds had higher NAEQ scores (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multiple strategies, including enhanced education and training and improved multidisciplinary communication and collaboration, are expected to improve nurse AMS engagement. It is important to give more attention to nurses with intermediate professional titles, less experience, and those working in specific departments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001448/pdfft?md5=1d6db2138566afefa80288aed0017787&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013223001448-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223001448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the level and influencing factors of nurses’ antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) engagement in China based on the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior (COM-B) theory, providing valuable insights for developing effective strategies to improve nursing quality in AMS.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 17 tertiary hospitals in Hunan, China, from November 2021 to January 2022. A total of 4,514 nurses were selected. The Nurse AMS Engagement Questionnaire (NAEQ), developed using the COM-B theory, was used for evaluation. The questionnaire included capability (14 items), opportunity (7 items), motivation (6 items), and behavior (12 items) four dimensions, 39 items.

Results

The total NAEQ score was 155.08 ± 27.12, indicating a moderate level. The score of the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior dimensions were 52.33 ± 13.48, 28.64 ± 5.76, 24.57 ± 4.57 and 49.53 ± 8.83, respectively. Significant differences in nurses’ AMS engagement were based on professional titles, whether working as a part-time infection control nurse, whether knowing the AMS teams and the defined daily doses of antibiotics, department type, the deployment of clinical pharmacists, and frequency of antimicrobial training and physician-nurse joint rounds (P < 0.05). Nurses with junior titles had higher scores on the NAEQ than nurses with intermediate titles (P < 0.05). Nurses who worked as part-time infection control nurses, knew the AMS team, and the defined daily doses of antibiotics had higher NAEQ scores than those who didn’t (P < 0.01). Nurses working in the ICU and infectious disease department had lower NAEQ scores than those in other departments, such as the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) department (P < 0.01). Nurses who had clinical pharmacists deployed in their department had higher NAEQ scores than those without or unclear deployment (P < 0.01). Furthermore, nurses who received more frequent antimicrobial training and participated in physician-nurse joint rounds had higher NAEQ scores (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Multiple strategies, including enhanced education and training and improved multidisciplinary communication and collaboration, are expected to improve nurse AMS engagement. It is important to give more attention to nurses with intermediate professional titles, less experience, and those working in specific departments.

中国护士参与抗菌药物管理及其影响因素:横断面研究
目的 本研究旨在基于能力、机会、动机和行为(COM-B)理论,探讨中国护士抗菌药物管理(AMS)的参与水平和影响因素,为制定有效策略提高抗菌药物管理的护理质量提供有价值的见解。方法 本横断面研究于 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 1 月在中国湖南的 17 家三级医院进行。共选取了 4514 名护士。采用 COM-B 理论开发的护士 AMS 参与度问卷(NAEQ)进行评估。该问卷包括能力(14 个项目)、机会(7 个项目)、动机(6 个项目)和行为(12 个项目)四个维度,共 39 个项目。能力、机会、动机和行为维度的得分分别为(52.33±13.48)分、(28.64±5.76)分、(24.57±4.57)分和(49.53±8.83)分。不同职称的护士、是否兼职感染控制护士、是否了解AMS小组和规定的抗生素日剂量、科室类型、临床药师的配备、抗菌药物培训和医护联合查房的频率等因素在护士AMS参与度上存在显著差异(P <0.05)。初级职称护士的 NAEQ 分数高于中级职称护士(P < 0.05)。担任兼职感染控制护士、了解 AMS 小组和规定的每日抗生素剂量的护士的 NAEQ 分数高于不了解的护士(P < 0.01)。在重症监护室和传染病科工作的护士的 NAEQ 分数低于耳鼻喉科等其他科室的护士(P <0.01)。科室配备临床药师的护士的 NAEQ 分数高于未配备或未明确配备临床药师的护士(P <0.01)。此外,接受抗菌药物培训更频繁和参加医生护士联合查房的护士的 NAEQ 分数更高(P < 0.01)。结论多种策略,包括加强教育和培训以及改善多学科沟通与合作,有望提高护士 AMS 的参与度。对中级职称、经验较少以及在特定科室工作的护士给予更多关注非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信